Literature DB >> 26371383

The impact of interference on short-term memory for visual orientation.

Rosanne L Rademaker1, Ilona M Bloem1, Peter De Weerd1, Alexander T Sack1.   

Abstract

Visual short-term memory serves as an efficient buffer for maintaining no longer directly accessible information. How robust are visual memories against interference? Memory for simple visual features has proven vulnerable to distractors containing conflicting information along the relevant stimulus dimension, leading to the idea that interacting feature-specific channels at an early stage of visual processing support memory for simple visual features. Here we showed that memory for a single randomly orientated grating was susceptible to interference from a to-be-ignored distractor grating presented midway through a 3-s delay period. Memory for the initially presented orientation became noisier when it differed from the distractor orientation, and response distributions were shifted toward the distractor orientation (by ∼3°). Interestingly, when the distractor was rendered task-relevant by making it a second memory target, memory for both retained orientations showed reduced reliability as a function of increased orientation differences between them. However, the degree to which responses to the first grating shifted toward the orientation of the task-relevant second grating was much reduced. Finally, using a dichoptic display, we demonstrated that these systematic biases caused by a consciously perceived distractor disappeared once the distractor was presented outside of participants' awareness. Together, our results show that visual short-term memory for orientation can be systematically biased by interfering information that is consciously perceived. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26371383     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  27 in total

1.  Flexible Coding of Visual Working Memory Representations during Distraction.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Lorenc; Kartik K Sreenivasan; Derek E Nee; Annelinde R E Vandenbroucke; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Characterizing the Impact of Distracting Input on Visual Working Memory Representations.

Authors:  Doris Pischedda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Unexpected events disrupt visuomotor working memory and increase guessing.

Authors:  R Dawn Finzi; Bradley R Postle; Timothy F Brady; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-04

4.  Quantifying attentional effects on the fidelity and biases of visual working memory in young children.

Authors:  Sylvia B Guillory; Teodora Gliga; Zsuzsa Kaldy
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2017-11-22

Review 5.  Neural mechanisms of information storage in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  John T Serences
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Visual Memories Bypass Normalization.

Authors:  Ilona M Bloem; Yurika L Watanabe; Melissa M Kibbe; Sam Ling
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-03-29

7.  Optimizing perception: Attended and ignored stimuli create opposing perceptual biases.

Authors:  Mohsen Rafiei; Sabrina Hansmann-Roth; David Whitney; Árni Kristjánsson; Andrey Chetverikov
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Interactions between visual working memory representations.

Authors:  Gi-Yeul Bae; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Evidence of gradual loss of precision for simple features and complex objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  Rosanne L Rademaker; Young Eun Park; Alexander T Sack; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Separating memoranda in depth increases visual working memory performance.

Authors:  Chaipat Chunharas; Rosanne L Rademaker; Thomas C Sprague; Timothy F Brady; John T Serences
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.