Literature DB >> 29494191

Evidence of gradual loss of precision for simple features and complex objects in visual working memory.

Rosanne L Rademaker1, Young Eun Park2, Alexander T Sack3, Frank Tong2.   

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that people can maintain prioritized items in visual working memory for many seconds, with negligible loss of information over time. Such findings imply that working memory representations are robust to the potential contaminating effects of internal noise. However, once visual information is encoded into working memory, one might expect it to inevitably begin degrading over time, as this actively maintained information is no longer tethered to the original perceptual input. Here, we examined this issue by evaluating working memory for single central presentations of an oriented grating, color patch, or face stimulus, across a range of delay periods (1, 3, 6, or 12 s). We applied a mixture-model analysis to distinguish changes in memory precision over time from changes in the frequency of outlier responses that resemble random guesses. For all 3 types of stimuli, participants exhibited a clear and consistent decline in the precision of working memory as a function of temporal delay, as well as a modest increase in guessing-related responses for colored patches and face stimuli. We observed a similar loss of precision over time while controlling for temporal distinctiveness. Our results demonstrate that visual working memory is far from lossless: while basic visual features and complex objects can be maintained in a quite stable manner over time, these representations are still subject to noise accumulation and complete termination. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29494191      PMCID: PMC5975117          DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  54 in total

Review 1.  Synaptic reverberation underlying mnemonic persistent activity.

Authors:  X J Wang
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 2.  Visual short-term memory and motor planning.

Authors:  Mary Hayhoe; Pilar Aivar; Anurag Shrivastavah; Ryan Mruczek
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.453

3.  Generalizing the dynamic field theory of spatial cognition across real and developmental time scales.

Authors:  Vanessa R Simmering; Anne R Schutte; John P Spencer
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Variability in encoding precision accounts for visual short-term memory limitations.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Hongsup Shin; Wen-Chuang Chou; Ryan George; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Spatial frequency discrimination: visual long-term memory or criterion setting?

Authors:  M Lages; M Treisman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Accounting for stimulus-specific variation in precision reveals a discrete capacity limit in visual working memory.

Authors:  Michael S Pratte; Young Eun Park; Rosanne L Rademaker; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Working memory retrieval as a decision process.

Authors:  Benjamin Pearson; Julius Raskevicius; Paul M Bays; Yoni Pertzov; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  12 in total

1.  A Flexible Model of Working Memory.

Authors:  Flora Bouchacourt; Timothy J Buschman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Attention fluctuations impact ongoing maintenance of information in working memory.

Authors:  Nicole Hakim; Megan T deBettencourt; Edward Awh; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-12

3.  Separating memoranda in depth increases visual working memory performance.

Authors:  Chaipat Chunharas; Rosanne L Rademaker; Thomas C Sprague; Timothy F Brady; John T Serences
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  An adaptive perspective on visual working memory distortions.

Authors:  Chaipat Chunharas; Rosanne L Rademaker; Timothy F Brady; John T Serences
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2022-02-21

5.  Individual differences in infancy research: Letting the baby stand out from the crowd.

Authors:  Koraly Pérez-Edgar; Alicia Vallorani; Kristin A Buss; Vanessa LoBue
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2020-05-04

6.  Error-correcting dynamics in visual working memory.

Authors:  Matthew F Panichello; Brian DePasquale; Jonathan W Pillow; Timothy J Buschman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  The visual nonverbal memory trace is fragile when actively maintained, but endures passively for tens of seconds.

Authors:  Denis McKeown; Tom Mercer; Kinga Bugajska; Paul Duffy; Emma Barker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-02

8.  Temporal dynamics of implicit memory underlying serial dependence.

Authors:  Cristiano Moraes Bilacchi; Esaú Ventura Pupo Sirius; André Mascioli Cravo; Raymundo Machado de Azevedo Neto
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-08-09

9.  Errors in visuospatial working memory across space and time.

Authors:  Linjing Jiang; Hoi-Chung Leung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Drifting codes within a stable coding scheme for working memory.

Authors:  Michael J Wolff; Janina Jochim; Elkan G Akyürek; Timothy J Buschman; Mark G Stokes
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.