| Literature DB >> 26369833 |
Akintunde Akinleye1, Chaitanya Iragavarapu1, Muhammad Furqan2, Shundong Cang3, Delong Liu4.
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is relatively insensitive to conventional chemotherapy. Therefore, novel agents targeting dysregulated pathways (MAPK/ERK, EGFR, TGF-β, HEDGEHOG, NOTCH, IGF, PARP, PI3K/AKT, RAS, and Src) are being explored in clinical trials as monotherapy or in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. This review summarizes the most recent advances with the targeted therapies in the treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.Entities:
Keywords: IGF-1R; pancreatic cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26369833 PMCID: PMC4741843 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.3999
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Phase III trials of gemcitabine containing regimens in advanced pancreatic cancer
| Trial | Regimen | Primary endpoint | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MPACT | gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel vs. gemcitabine | mOS: 8.5 vs. 6.7 months ( | [ |
| GIP-1 | gemcitabine + cisplatin vs. gemcitabine | mOS: 8.3 vs. 7.2 months ( | [ |
| GEM-CAP | gemcitabine + capecitabine vs. gemcitabine | mOS: 7.1 vs. 6.2 months ( | [ |
| E6201 | gemcitabine + oxaliplatin vs. gemcitabine | mOS: 5.7 vs. 4.9 months ( | [ |
| NCT00023972 | gemcitabine + exatecan vs. gemcitabine | mOS: 6.7 vs. 6.2 months ( | [ |
| Stathopoulos et al. | gemcitabine + irinotecan vs. gemcitabine | mOS: 6.4 vs. 6.5 months ( | [ |
| NCT00035035 | gemcitabine + pemetrexed vs. gemcitabine | mOS: 6.2 vs. 6.3 months ( | [ |
| E2297 | gemcitabine + 5-FU vs. gemcitabine | mOS: 6.7 vs. 5.4 months ( | [ |
Abbreviations: 5-FU – 5-fluorouracil; mOS – median overall survival.
Phase III trials of gemcitabine with biologics in advanced pancreatic cancer
| Trial | Regimen | Primary endpoint | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWOG S0205 | gemcitabine + cetuximab vs. gemcitabine | mOS: 6.3 vs. 5.9 months ( | [ |
| CALGB 80303 | gemcitabine + bevacizumab vs. gemcitabine | mOS: 5.8 vs. 5.9 months ( | [ |
| GAMMA | gemcitabine + ganitumab vs. gemcitabine | mOS: 7.1 vs. 7.0 months ( | [ |
Abbreviation: mOS: median overall survival.
Phase II/III trials of gemcitabine with small molecule inhibitors in advanced pancreatic cancer
| Trial | Regimen | Primary endpoint | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAYPAN | gemcitabine + sorafenib vs. gemcitabine | mPFS: 3.8 vs. 5.7months ( | [ |
| NCT00471146 | gemcitabine + axitinib vs. gemcitabine | mOS: 8.5 vs. 8.3 months ( | [ |
| CESAR | gemcitabine + sunitinib vs. gemcitabine | mPFS: 11.6 vs. 13.3 weeks ( | [ |
| NCT00574275 | gemcitabine + aflibercept vs. gemcitabine | mOS: 6.5 vs. 7.8 months ( | [ |
| NCT00005648 | gemcitabine + tipifarnib vs. gemcitabine | mOS: 193 vs. 182 days ( | [ |
| NCT00409292 | gemcitabine + everolimus | mOS: 4.5months | [ |
| NCT01231581 | gemcitabine + trametinib vs. gemcitabine | mOS: 8.4 vs. 6.7 months ( | [ |
| NCIC CTG PA.3 | gemcitabine + erlotinib vs. gemcitabine | mOS: 6.24 vs. 5.91 months ( | [ |
Abbreviations: mOS – median overall survival; mPFS – median progression-free survival.
Figure 1Signaling pathways for insulin and insulin-like growth factors
Three growth factors, insulin, insulin-like 1, and 2 signal through four major receptors—homodimeric insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R), homodimeric insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor (IGF-2R), heterodimeric insulin receptor (IR) /IGF-1R, and homodimeric IR. There pathways contribute to diverse cellular functions, including proliferation, survival, apoptosis, and cell metabolism. The corresponding ligands activating these receptors are highlighted. The diverse downstream signaling proteins are indicated. Dalotuzumab, R-1507, and cixutumumab are the agents in development targeting IGF receptors.