Literature DB >> 20194854

Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with single-agent gemcitabine as first-line treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: the GIP-1 study.

Giuseppe Colucci1, Roberto Labianca, Francesco Di Costanzo, Vittorio Gebbia, Giacomo Cartenì, Bruno Massidda, Elisa Dapretto, Luigi Manzione, Elena Piazza, Mirella Sannicolò, Marco Ciaparrone, Luigi Cavanna, Francesco Giuliani, Evaristo Maiello, Antonio Testa, Paolo Pederzoli, Massimo Falconi, Ciro Gallo, Massimo Di Maio, Francesco Perrone.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Single-agent gemcitabine became standard first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer after demonstration of superiority compared with fluorouracil. The Gruppo Italiano Pancreas 1 randomized phase III trial aimed to compare gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT00813696). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, age 18 to 75 years, and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > or = 50, were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine (arm A) or gemcitabine plus cisplatin (arm B). Arm A: gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) weekly for 7 weeks, and, after a 1-week rest, on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. Arm B: cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) added weekly to gemcitabine, except cycle 1 day 22. Primary end point was overall survival. To have 8% power of detecting a 0.74 hazard ratio (HR) of death, with bilateral alpha .05, 355 events were needed and 400 patients planned.
RESULTS: Four hundred patients were enrolled (arm A: 199; arm B: 201). Median age was 63, 59% were male, 84% had stage IV, and 83% had KPS > or = 80. Median overall survival was 8.3 months versus 7.2 months in arm A and B, respectively (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.35; P = .38). Median progression-free survival was 3.9 months versus 3.8 months in arm A and B, respectively (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.19; P = .80). The objective response rate was 10.1% in A and 12.9% in B (P = .37). Clinical benefit was experienced by 23.0% in A and 15.1% in B (P = .057). Combination therapy produced more hematologic toxicity, without relevant differences in nonhematologic toxicity.
CONCLUSION: The addition of weekly cisplatin to gemcitabine failed to demonstrate any improvement as first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20194854     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  113 in total

1.  Regional hyperthermia combined with chemoradiotherapy in primary or recurrent locally advanced pancreatic cancer : an open-label comparative cohort trial.

Authors:  Sergio Maluta; Moshe Schaffer; Fabio Pioli; Stefano Dall'oglio; Stefano Pasetto; Pamela M Schaffer; Bernard Weber; Maria Grazia Giri
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  Developments in metastatic pancreatic cancer: is gemcitabine still the standard?

Authors:  Jie-Er Ying; Li-Ming Zhu; Bi-Xia Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Margaret A Tempero; J Pablo Arnoletti; Stephen Behrman; Edgar Ben-Josef; Al B Benson; Jordan D Berlin; John L Cameron; Ephraim S Casper; Steven J Cohen; Michelle Duff; Joshua D I Ellenhorn; William G Hawkins; John P Hoffman; Boris W Kuvshinoff; Mokenge P Malafa; Peter Muscarella; Eric K Nakakura; Aaron R Sasson; Sarah P Thayer; Douglas S Tyler; Robert S Warren; Samuel Whiting; Christopher Willett; Robert A Wolff
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.908

4.  A phase II trial of Erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  In Gyu Hwang; Joung-Soon Jang; Sung Yong Oh; Suee Lee; Hyuk Chan Kwon; Gyeong Won Lee; Seil Go; Myoung Hee Kang; Young Joo Cha; Jung Hun Kang
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  Elevated baseline CA19-9 levels correlate with adverse prognosis in patients with early- or advanced-stage pancreas cancer.

Authors:  Ludmila Katherine Martin; Lai Wei; Elizabeth Trolli; Tanios Bekaii-Saab
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 6.  Preclinical Rationale for the Phase III Trials in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Is Wishful Thinking Clouding Successful Drug Development for Pancreatic Cancer?

Authors:  Ramya Thota; Anirban Maitra; Jordan D Berlin
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.327

7.  Efficacy of platinum chemotherapy agents in the adjuvant setting for adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas.

Authors:  Aaron T Wild; Avani S Dholakia; Katherine Y Fan; Rachit Kumar; Shalini Moningi; Lauren M Rosati; Daniel A Laheru; Lei Zheng; Ana De Jesus-Acosta; Susannah G Ellsworth; Amy Hacker-Prietz; Khinh R Voong; Phuoc T Tran; Ralph H Hruban; Timothy M Pawlik; Christopher L Wolfgang; Joseph M Herman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-04

Review 8.  Advances in chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Bhawna Sirohi; Ashish Singh; Shaheenah Dawood; Shailesh V Shrikhande
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-01-13

9.  Bufalin exerts antitumor effects by inducing cell cycle arrest and triggering apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells.

Authors:  Meiying Li; Xuejun Yu; Hui Guo; Limei Sun; Aijun Wang; Qiji Liu; Xiuwen Wang; Jisheng Li
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-11-12

10.  Insights into the Role of microRNAs in Pancreatic Cancer Pathogenesis: Potential for Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapy.

Authors:  Mohammad Aslam Khan; Haseeb Zubair; Sanjeev Kumar Srivastava; Seema Singh; Ajay Pratap Singh
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.