Literature DB >> 20606093

Phase III study comparing gemcitabine plus cetuximab versus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Southwest Oncology Group-directed intergroup trial S0205.

Philip A Philip1, Jacqueline Benedetti, Christopher L Corless, Ralph Wong, Eileen M O'Reilly, Patrick J Flynn, Kendrith M Rowland, James N Atkins, Barry C Mirtsching, Saul E Rivkin, Alok A Khorana, Bryan Goldman, Cecilia M Fenoglio-Preiser, James L Abbruzzese, Charles D Blanke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients with advanced pancreas cancer present with disease that is poorly responsive to conventional therapies. Preclinical and early clinical evidence has supported targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway in patients with pancreas cancer. This trial was conducted to evaluate the contribution of an EGFR-targeted agent to standard gemcitabine therapy. Cetuximab is a monoclonal antibody against the ligand-binding domain of the receptor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine alone or gemcitabine plus cetuximab. The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, objective response, and toxicity.
RESULTS: A total of 745 eligible patients were accrued. No significant difference was seen between the two arms of the study with respect to the median survival time (6.3 months for the gemcitabine plus cetuximab arm v 5.9 months for the gemcitabine alone arm; hazard ratio = 1.06; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.23; P = .23, one-sided). Objective responses and progression-free survival were similar in both arms of the study. Although time to treatment failure was longer in patients on gemcitabine plus cetuximab (P = .006), the difference in length of treatment was only 2 weeks longer in the combination arm. Among patients who were studied for tumoral EGFR expression, 90% were positive, with no treatment benefit detected in this patient subset.
CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced pancreas cancer, the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab did not improve the outcome compared with patients treated with gemcitabine alone. Alternate targets other than EGFR should be evaluated for new drug development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20606093      PMCID: PMC2917315          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.7550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  16 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Consensus report of the international society of gastrointestinal oncology on therapeutic progress in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Howard S Hochster; Daniel G Haller; Aimery de Gramont; Jordan D Berlin; Philip A Philip; Malcolm J Moore; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Blockade of the epidermal growth factor receptor signaling by a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor leads to apoptosis of endothelial cells and therapy of human pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  C J Bruns; C C Solorzano; M T Harbison; S Ozawa; R Tsan; D Fan; J Abbruzzese; P Traxler; E Buchdunger; R Radinsky; I J Fidler
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors:  H A Burris; M J Moore; J Andersen; M R Green; M L Rothenberg; M R Modiano; M C Cripps; R K Portenoy; A M Storniolo; P Tarassoff; R Nelson; F A Dorr; C D Stephens; D D Von Hoff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Epidermal growth factor receptor blockade by antibody IMC-C225 inhibits growth of a human pancreatic carcinoma xenograft in nude mice.

Authors:  J P Overholser; M C Prewett; A T Hooper; H W Waksal; D J Hicklin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Developments in the systemic therapy of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  B F el-Rayes; A F Shields; V Vaitkevicius; P A Philip
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.176

7.  Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  David Cunningham; Yves Humblet; Salvatore Siena; David Khayat; Harry Bleiberg; Armando Santoro; Danny Bets; Matthias Mueser; Andreas Harstrick; Chris Verslype; Ian Chau; Eric Van Cutsem
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Coexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor and ligands in human pancreatic cancer is associated with enhanced tumor aggressiveness.

Authors:  Y Yamanaka; H Friess; M S Kobrin; M Buchler; H G Beger; M Korc
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.480

9.  Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor, in combination with gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer: a multicenter phase II Trial.

Authors:  Henry Q Xiong; Arthur Rosenberg; Albert LoBuglio; William Schmidt; Robert A Wolff; John Deutsch; Michael Needle; James L Abbruzzese
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The correlation between cytoplasmic overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor and tumor aggressiveness: poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shigeto Ueda; Sho Ogata; Hitoshi Tsuda; Nobuaki Kawarabayashi; Mikihiko Kimura; Yoshiaki Sugiura; Seiichi Tamai; Osamu Matsubara; Kazuo Hatsuse; Hidetaka Mochizuki
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.327

View more
  254 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of phase III randomized trials of molecular targeted therapies for advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Karim M Eltawil; Paul D Renfrew; Michele Molinari
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 2.  Developments in metastatic pancreatic cancer: is gemcitabine still the standard?

Authors:  Jie-Er Ying; Li-Ming Zhu; Bi-Xia Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Gemcitabine plus erlotinib followed by capecitabine versus capecitabine plus erlotinib followed by gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: final results of a randomised phase 3 trial of the 'Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie' (AIO-PK0104).

Authors:  Volker Heinemann; Ursula Vehling-Kaiser; Dirk Waldschmidt; Erika Kettner; Angela Märten; Cornelia Winkelmann; Stefan Klein; Georgi Kojouharoff; Thomas C Gauler; Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal; Michael R Clemens; Michael Geissler; Tim F Greten; Susanna Hegewisch-Becker; Oleg Rubanov; Gerold Baake; Thomas Höhler; Yon D Ko; Andreas Jung; Sascha Neugebauer; Stefan Boeck
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Preclinical Rationale for the Phase III Trials in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Is Wishful Thinking Clouding Successful Drug Development for Pancreatic Cancer?

Authors:  Ramya Thota; Anirban Maitra; Jordan D Berlin
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 5.  The State-of-the-Art of Phase II/III Clinical Trials for Targeted Pancreatic Cancer Therapies.

Authors:  Andres Garcia-Sampedro; Gabriella Gaggia; Alexander Ney; Ismahan Mahamed; Pilar Acedo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma With the Introduction of New Chemotherapeutic Drugs: 10-Year Experience of a Single NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Authors:  Kevin J Zhang; Greg Dyson; Joshua L Gatz; Michael E Silverman; Anteneh A Tesfaye; Anthony F Shields; Philip A Philip
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.339

7.  Phase II Trial of Cetuximab and Conformal Radiotherapy Only in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer with Concurrent Tissue Sampling Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Agata I Rembielak; Pooja Jain; Andrew S Jackson; Melanie M Green; Gillian R Santorelli; Gillian A Whitfield; Adrian Crellin; Angel Garcia-Alonso; Ganesh Radhakrishna; James Cullen; M Ben Taylor; Ric Swindell; Catharine M West; Juan Valle; Azeem Saleem; Patricia M Price
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 8.  Pancreatic cancer: role of the immune system in cancer progression and vaccine-based immunotherapy.

Authors:  Amedeo Amedei; Elena Niccolai; Domenico Prisco
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Reduction in circulating pro-angiogenic and pro-inflammatory factors is related to improved outcomes in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine and intravenous omega-3 fish oil.

Authors:  Ali Arshad; Wen Y Chung; William Steward; Matthew S Metcalfe; Ashley R Dennison
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Evaluation of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase catalytic subunit (PIK3CA) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations in pancreaticobiliary adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Guy A Weiss; Michael R Rossi; Nikhil I Khushalani; Ken Lo; John F Gibbs; Anubha Bharthuar; John K Cowell; Renuka Iyer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.