Literature DB >> 24131140

Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine.

Daniel D Von Hoff1, Thomas Ervin, Francis P Arena, E Gabriela Chiorean, Jeffrey Infante, Malcolm Moore, Thomas Seay, Sergei A Tjulandin, Wen Wee Ma, Mansoor N Saleh, Marion Harris, Michele Reni, Scot Dowden, Daniel Laheru, Nathan Bahary, Ramesh K Ramanathan, Josep Tabernero, Manuel Hidalgo, David Goldstein, Eric Van Cutsem, Xinyu Wei, Jose Iglesias, Markus F Renschler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a phase 1-2 trial of albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) plus gemcitabine, substantial clinical activity was noted in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. We conducted a phase 3 study of the efficacy and safety of the combination versus gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.
METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with a Karnofsky performance-status score of 70 or more (on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better performance status) to nab-paclitaxel (125 mg per square meter of body-surface area) followed by gemcitabine (1000 mg per square meter) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks or gemcitabine monotherapy (1000 mg per square meter) weekly for 7 of 8 weeks (cycle 1) and then on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks (cycle 2 and subsequent cycles). Patients received the study treatment until disease progression. The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points were progression-free survival and overall response rate.
RESULTS: A total of 861 patients were randomly assigned to nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (431 patients) or gemcitabine (430). The median overall survival was 8.5 months in the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group as compared with 6.7 months in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio for death, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 0.83; P<0.001). The survival rate was 35% in the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group versus 22% in the gemcitabine group at 1 year, and 9% versus 4% at 2 years. The median progression-free survival was 5.5 months in the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group, as compared with 3.7 months in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.82; P<0.001); the response rate according to independent review was 23% versus 7% in the two groups (P<0.001). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher were neutropenia (38% in the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group vs. 27% in the gemcitabine group), fatigue (17% vs. 7%), and neuropathy (17% vs. 1%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 3% versus 1% of the patients in the two groups. In the nab-paclitaxel-gemcitabine group, neuropathy of grade 3 or higher improved to grade 1 or lower in a median of 29 days.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine significantly improved overall survival, progression-free survival, and response rate, but rates of peripheral neuropathy and myelosuppression were increased. (Funded by Celgene; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00844649.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24131140      PMCID: PMC4631139          DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1304369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  22 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  BAYPAN study: a double-blind phase III randomized trial comparing gemcitabine plus sorafenib and gemcitabine plus placebo in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  A Gonçalves; M Gilabert; E François; L Dahan; H Perrier; R Lamy; D Re; R Largillier; M Gasmi; X Tchiknavorian; B Esterni; D Genre; L Moureau-Zabotto; M Giovannini; J-F Seitz; J-R Delpero; O Turrini; P Viens; J-L Raoul
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Thierry Conroy; Françoise Desseigne; Marc Ychou; Olivier Bouché; Rosine Guimbaud; Yves Bécouarn; Antoine Adenis; Jean-Luc Raoul; Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade; Christelle de la Fouchardière; Jaafar Bennouna; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Faiza Khemissa-Akouz; Denis Péré-Vergé; Catherine Delbaldo; Eric Assenat; Bruno Chauffert; Pierre Michel; Christine Montoto-Grillot; Michel Ducreux
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  A phase III trial of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine in patients with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  H Oettle; D Richards; R K Ramanathan; J L van Laethem; M Peeters; M Fuchs; A Zimmermann; W John; D Von Hoff; M Arning; H L Kindler
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Phase III trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel compared with polyethylated castor oil-based paclitaxel in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  William J Gradishar; Sergei Tjulandin; Neville Davidson; Heather Shaw; Neil Desai; Paul Bhar; Michael Hawkins; Joyce O'Shaughnessy
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Randomized phase III study of exatecan and gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in untreated advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Ghassan K Abou-Alfa; Richard Letourneau; Graydon Harker; Manuel Modiano; Herbert Hurwitz; Nerses Simon Tchekmedyian; Kevie Feit; Judie Ackerman; Robert L De Jager; S Gail Eckhardt; Eileen M O'Reilly
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with single-agent gemcitabine as first-line treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: the GIP-1 study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Colucci; Roberto Labianca; Francesco Di Costanzo; Vittorio Gebbia; Giacomo Cartenì; Bruno Massidda; Elisa Dapretto; Luigi Manzione; Elena Piazza; Mirella Sannicolò; Marco Ciaparrone; Luigi Cavanna; Francesco Giuliani; Evaristo Maiello; Antonio Testa; Paolo Pederzoli; Massimo Falconi; Ciro Gallo; Massimo Di Maio; Francesco Perrone
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Phase III study comparing gemcitabine plus cetuximab versus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Southwest Oncology Group-directed intergroup trial S0205.

Authors:  Philip A Philip; Jacqueline Benedetti; Christopher L Corless; Ralph Wong; Eileen M O'Reilly; Patrick J Flynn; Kendrith M Rowland; James N Atkins; Barry C Mirtsching; Saul E Rivkin; Alok A Khorana; Bryan Goldman; Cecilia M Fenoglio-Preiser; James L Abbruzzese; Charles D Blanke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Irinotecan plus gemcitabine results in no survival advantage compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer despite increased tumor response rate.

Authors:  Caio M Rocha Lima; Mark R Green; Robert Rotche; Wilson H Miller; G Mark Jeffrey; Laura A Cisar; Adele Morganti; Nicoletta Orlando; Gabriela Gruia; Langdon L Miller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  nab-Paclitaxel potentiates gemcitabine activity by reducing cytidine deaminase levels in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Kristopher K Frese; Albrecht Neesse; Natalie Cook; Tashinga E Bapiro; Martijn P Lolkema; Duncan I Jodrell; David A Tuveson
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 39.397

View more
  1864 in total

1.  Pancreatic cancer arising from the remnant pancreas after pancreatectomy: a multicenter retrospective study by the Kyushu Study Group of Clinical Cancer.

Authors:  Daisuke Hashimoto; Kota Arima; Shigeki Nakagawa; Yuji Negoro; Toshihiko Hirata; Masahiko Hirota; Masafumi Inomata; Kengo Fukuzawa; Takefumi Ohga; Hiroshi Saeki; Eiji Oki; Yo-Ichi Yamashita; Akira Chikamoto; Hideo Baba; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Olaparib monotherapy in patients with advanced cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation.

Authors:  Bella Kaufman; Ronnie Shapira-Frommer; Rita K Schmutzler; M William Audeh; Michael Friedlander; Judith Balmaña; Gillian Mitchell; Georgeta Fried; Salomon M Stemmer; Ayala Hubert; Ora Rosengarten; Mariana Steiner; Niklas Loman; Karin Bowen; Anitra Fielding; Susan M Domchek
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma With the Introduction of New Chemotherapeutic Drugs: 10-Year Experience of a Single NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Authors:  Kevin J Zhang; Greg Dyson; Joshua L Gatz; Michael E Silverman; Anteneh A Tesfaye; Anthony F Shields; Philip A Philip
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.339

Review 4.  Genetic Diversity of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Opportunities for Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Erik S Knudsen; Eileen M O'Reilly; Jonathan R Brody; Agnieszka K Witkiewicz
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  The mRNA-binding protein HuR promotes hypoxia-induced chemoresistance through posttranscriptional regulation of the proto-oncogene PIM1 in pancreatic cancer cells.

Authors:  F F Blanco; M Jimbo; J Wulfkuhle; I Gallagher; J Deng; L Enyenihi; N Meisner-Kober; E Londin; I Rigoutsos; J A Sawicki; M V Risbud; A K Witkiewicz; P A McCue; W Jiang; H Rui; C J Yeo; E Petricoin; J M Winter; J R Brody
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Pharmacodynamic separation of gemcitabine and erlotinib in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: therapeutic and biomarker results.

Authors:  Thomas Semrad; Afsaneh Barzi; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Irene M Hutchins; Edward J Kim; I-Yeh Gong; Michael Tanaka; Laurel Beckett; William Holland; Rebekah A Burich; Leslie Snyder-Solis; Philip Mack; Primo N Lara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  Status and future directions in the management of pancreatic cancer: potential impact of nanotechnology.

Authors:  Catherine M Sielaff; Shaker A Mousa
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Prognostic significance of circulating tumor microemboli in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Guangdong Wu; Rongrong Zhu; Yatong Li; Yupei Zhao; Menghua Dai
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 9.  [Oligometastasis in pancreatic cancer : Current state of knowledge and spectrum of local therapy].

Authors:  F Gebauer; A I Damanakis; C Bruns
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Vascular beds maintain pancreatic tumour explants for ex vivo drug screening.

Authors:  Despina Bazou; Nir Maimon; Gabriel Gruionu; Jelena Grahovac; Giorgio Seano; Hao Liu; Conor L Evans; Lance L Munn
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.