Literature DB >> 26362074

Machine learning approaches to analyze histological images of tissues from radical prostatectomies.

Arkadiusz Gertych1, Nathan Ing2, Zhaoxuan Ma3, Thomas J Fuchs4, Sadri Salman2, Sambit Mohanty5, Sanica Bhele5, Adriana Velásquez-Vacca2, Mahul B Amin5, Beatrice S Knudsen6.   

Abstract

Computerized evaluation of histological preparations of prostate tissues involves identification of tissue components such as stroma (ST), benign/normal epithelium (BN) and prostate cancer (PCa). Image classification approaches have been developed to identify and classify glandular regions in digital images of prostate tissues; however their success has been limited by difficulties in cellular segmentation and tissue heterogeneity. We hypothesized that utilizing image pixels to generate intensity histograms of hematoxylin (H) and eosin (E) stains deconvoluted from H&E images numerically captures the architectural difference between glands and stroma. In addition, we postulated that joint histograms of local binary patterns and local variance (LBPxVAR) can be used as sensitive textural features to differentiate benign/normal tissue from cancer. Here we utilized a machine learning approach comprising of a support vector machine (SVM) followed by a random forest (RF) classifier to digitally stratify prostate tissue into ST, BN and PCa areas. Two pathologists manually annotated 210 images of low- and high-grade tumors from slides that were selected from 20 radical prostatectomies and digitized at high-resolution. The 210 images were split into the training (n=19) and test (n=191) sets. Local intensity histograms of H and E were used to train a SVM classifier to separate ST from epithelium (BN+PCa). The performance of SVM prediction was evaluated by measuring the accuracy of delineating epithelial areas. The Jaccard J=59.5 ± 14.6 and Rand Ri=62.0 ± 7.5 indices reported a significantly better prediction when compared to a reference method (Chen et al., Clinical Proteomics 2013, 10:18) based on the averaged values from the test set. To distinguish BN from PCa we trained a RF classifier with LBPxVAR and local intensity histograms and obtained separate performance values for BN and PCa: JBN=35.2 ± 24.9, OBN=49.6 ± 32, JPCa=49.5 ± 18.5, OPCa=72.7 ± 14.8 and Ri=60.6 ± 7.6 in the test set. Our pixel-based classification does not rely on the detection of lumens, which is prone to errors and has limitations in high-grade cancers and has the potential to aid in clinical studies in which the quantification of tumor content is necessary to prognosticate the course of the disease. The image data set with ground truth annotation is available for public use to stimulate further research in this area.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Image analysis; Machine learning; Prostate cancer; Tissue classification; Tissue quantification

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26362074      PMCID: PMC5062020          DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2015.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph        ISSN: 0895-6111            Impact factor:   4.790


  21 in total

1.  Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist.

Authors:  W C Allsbrook; K A Mangold; M H Johnson; R B Lane; C G Lane; J I Epstein
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  AACR Cancer Progress Report 2013.

Authors:  Charles L Sawyers; Cory Abate-Shen; Kenneth C Anderson; Anna Barker; Jose Baselga; Nathan A Berger; Margaret Foti; Ahmedin Jemal; Theodore S Lawrence; Christopher I Li; Elaine R Mardis; Peter J Neumann; Drew M Pardoll; George C Prendergast; John C Reed; George J Weiner
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Structure and context in prostatic gland segmentation and classification.

Authors:  Kien Nguyen; Anindya Sarkar; Anil K Jain
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2012

4.  A high-throughput active contour scheme for segmentation of histopathological imagery.

Authors:  Jun Xu; Andrew Janowczyk; Sharat Chandran; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Computational pathology: challenges and promises for tissue analysis.

Authors:  Thomas J Fuchs; Joachim M Buhmann
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 4.790

6.  High-throughput detection of prostate cancer in histological sections using probabilistic pairwise Markov models.

Authors:  James P Monaco; John E Tomaszewski; Michael D Feldman; Ian Hagemann; Mehdi Moradi; Parvin Mousavi; Alexander Boag; Chris Davidson; Purang Abolmaesumi; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Prostate histopathology: learning tissue component histograms for cancer detection and classification.

Authors:  Lena Gorelick; Olga Veksler; Mena Gaed; Jose A Gomez; Madeleine Moussa; Glenn Bauman; Aaron Fenster; Aaron D Ward
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Quantitative comparison of immunohistochemical staining measured by digital image analysis versus pathologist visual scoring.

Authors:  Anthony E Rizzardi; Arthur T Johnson; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Stefan E Pambuccian; Jonathan Henriksen; Amy Pn Skubitz; Gregory J Metzger; Stephen C Schmechel
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.644

9.  Identification of tumor epithelium and stroma in tissue microarrays using texture analysis.

Authors:  Nina Linder; Juho Konsti; Riku Turkki; Esa Rahtu; Mikael Lundin; Stig Nordling; Caj Haglund; Timo Ahonen; Matti Pietikäinen; Johan Lundin
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 2.644

10.  Epithelium percentage estimation facilitates epithelial quantitative protein measurement in tissue specimens.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Shadi Toghi Eshghi; George Steven Bova; Qing Kay Li; Xingde Li; Hui Zhang
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 3.988

View more
  21 in total

1.  A Multi-scale U-Net for Semantic Segmentation of Histological Images from Radical Prostatectomies.

Authors:  Jiayun Li; Karthik V Sarma; King Chung Ho; Arkadiusz Gertych; Beatrice S Knudsen; Corey W Arnold
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

Review 2.  Advances in the computational and molecular understanding of the prostate cancer cell nucleus.

Authors:  Neil M Carleton; George Lee; Anant Madabhushi; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 4.429

3.  Multiview boosting digital pathology analysis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jin Tae Kwak; Stephen M Hewitt
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 4.  Artificial intelligence at the intersection of pathology and radiology in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stephnie A Harmon; Sena Tuncer; Thomas Sanford; Peter L Choyke; Barış Türkbey
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 5.  Emerging Themes in Image Informatics and Molecular Analysis for Digital Pathology.

Authors:  Rohit Bhargava; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 9.590

Review 6.  Machine learning to detect signatures of disease in liquid biopsies - a user's guide.

Authors:  Jina Ko; Steven N Baldassano; Po-Ling Loh; Konrad Kording; Brian Litt; David Issadore
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 6.799

7.  Path R-CNN for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Histological Images.

Authors:  Wenyuan Li; Jiayun Li; Karthik V Sarma; King Chung Ho; Shiwen Shen; Beatrice S Knudsen; Arkadiusz Gertych; Corey W Arnold
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  An EM-based semi-supervised deep learning approach for semantic segmentation of histopathological images from radical prostatectomies.

Authors:  Jiayun Li; William Speier; King Chung Ho; Karthik V Sarma; Arkadiusz Gertych; Beatrice S Knudsen; Corey W Arnold
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 4.790

9.  A multi-resolution model for histopathology image classification and localization with multiple instance learning.

Authors:  Jiayun Li; Wenyuan Li; Anthony Sisk; Huihui Ye; W Dean Wallace; William Speier; Corey W Arnold
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.589

10.  Deep Learning-Based Image Classification in Differentiating Tufted Astrocytes, Astrocytic Plaques, and Neuritic Plaques.

Authors:  Shunsuke Koga; Nikhil B Ghayal; Dennis W Dickson
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.685

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.