Literature DB >> 29923622

Advances in the computational and molecular understanding of the prostate cancer cell nucleus.

Neil M Carleton1, George Lee2, Anant Madabhushi2, Robert W Veltri3.   

Abstract

Nuclear alterations are a hallmark of many types of cancers, including prostate cancer (PCa). Recent evidence shows that subvisual changes, ones that may not be visually perceptible to a pathologist, to the nucleus and its ultrastructural components can precede visual histopathological recognition of cancer. Alterations to nuclear features, such as nuclear size and shape, texture, and spatial architecture, reflect the complex molecular-level changes that occur during oncogenesis. Quantitative nuclear morphometry, a field that uses computational approaches to identify and quantify malignancy-induced nuclear changes, can enable a detailed and objective analysis of the PCa cell nucleus. Recent advances in machine learning-based approaches can now automatically mine data related to these changes to aid in the diagnosis, decision making, and prediction of PCa prognoses. In this review, we use PCa as a case study to connect the molecular-level mechanisms that underlie these nuclear changes to the machine learning computational approaches, bridging the gap between the clinical and computational understanding of PCa. First, we will discuss recent developments to our understanding of the molecular events that drive nuclear alterations in the context of PCa: the role of the nuclear matrix and lamina in size and shape changes, the role of 3-dimensional chromatin organization and epigenetic modifications in textural changes, and the role of the tumor microenvironment in altering nuclear spatial topology. We will then discuss the advances in the applications of machine learning algorithms to automatically segment nuclei in prostate histopathological images, extract nuclear features to aid in diagnostic decision making, and predict potential outcomes, such as biochemical recurrence and survival. Finally, we will discuss the challenges and opportunities associated with translation of the quantitative nuclear morphometry methodology into the clinical space. Ultimately, accurate identification and quantification of nuclear alterations can contribute to the field of nucleomics and has applications for computationally driven precision oncologic patient care.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  machine learning in medicine; molecular-level nuclear changes; nuclear architecture; prostate cancer; quantitative nuclear morphometry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29923622      PMCID: PMC6150831          DOI: 10.1002/jcb.27156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biochem        ISSN: 0730-2312            Impact factor:   4.429


  60 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of prostate cancer initiation and progression.

Authors:  Beatrice S Knudsen; Valera Vasioukhin
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.242

2.  A resolution adaptive deep hierarchical (RADHicaL) learning scheme applied to nuclear segmentation of digital pathology images.

Authors:  Andrew Janowczyk; Scott Doyle; Hannah Gilmore; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis       Date:  2016-04-28

Review 3.  Digital pathology and image analysis in tissue biomarker research.

Authors:  Peter W Hamilton; Peter Bankhead; Yinhai Wang; Ryan Hutchinson; Declan Kieran; Darragh G McArt; Jacqueline James; Manuel Salto-Tellez
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 4.  Regulation of genome organization and gene expression by nuclear mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Caroline Uhler; G V Shivashankar
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 94.444

5.  Cytoskeletal tension induces the polarized architecture of the nucleus.

Authors:  Dong-Hwee Kim; Denis Wirtz
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Rapid 3-D delineation of cell nuclei for high-content screening platforms.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Gertych; Zhaoxuan Ma; Jian Tajbakhsh; Adriana Velásquez-Vacca; Beatrice S Knudsen
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 4.589

7.  Cancer diagnosis by nuclear morphometry using spatial information .

Authors:  Hu Huang; Akif Burak Tosun; Jia Guo; Cheng Chen; Wei Wang; John A Ozolek; Gustavo K Rohde
Journal:  Pattern Recognit Lett       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 3.756

8.  Epigenetic risk score improves prostate cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Leander Van Neste; Jack Groskopf; William E Grizzle; George W Adams; Mark S DeGuenther; Peter N Kolettis; James E Bryant; Gary P Kearney; Michael C Kearney; Wim Van Criekinge; Sandra M Gaston
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.104

9.  An active learning based classification strategy for the minority class problem: application to histopathology annotation.

Authors:  Scott Doyle; James Monaco; Michael Feldman; John Tomaszewski; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Nanocytological field carcinogenesis detection to mitigate overdiagnosis of prostate cancer: a proof of concept study.

Authors:  Hemant K Roy; Charles B Brendler; Hariharan Subramanian; Di Zhang; Charles Maneval; John Chandler; Leah Bowen; Karen L Kaul; Brian T Helfand; Chi-Hsiung Wang; Margo Quinn; Jacqueline Petkewicz; Michael Paterakos; Vadim Backman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Characterization of RNA-Binding Motif 3 (RBM3) Protein Levels and Nuclear Architecture Changes in Aggressive and Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Neil M Carleton; Guangjing Zhu; M Craig Miller; Christine Davis; Prakash Kulkarni; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-01-29

2.  High mobility group A1 (HMGA1) protein and gene expression correlate with ER-negativity and poor outcomes in breast cancer.

Authors:  Mikhail Gorbounov; Neil M Carleton; Rebecca J Asch-Kendrick; Lingling Xian; Lisa Rooper; Lionel Chia; Ashley Cimino-Mathews; Leslie Cope; Alan Meeker; Vered Stearns; Robert W Veltri; Young Kyung Bae; Linda M S Resar
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 4.624

3.  Identification of key DNA methylation-driven genes in prostate adenocarcinoma: an integrative analysis of TCGA methylation data.

Authors:  Ning Xu; Yu-Peng Wu; Zhi-Bin Ke; Ying-Chun Liang; Hai Cai; Wen-Ting Su; Xuan Tao; Shao-Hao Chen; Qing-Shui Zheng; Yong Wei; Xue-Yi Xue
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.531

4.  The topology of vitronectin: A complementary feature for neuroblastoma risk classification based on computer-aided detection.

Authors:  Pablo Vicente-Munuera; Rebeca Burgos-Panadero; Inmaculada Noguera; Samuel Navarro; Rosa Noguera; Luis M Escudero
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 5.  A review of the application of machine learning in molecular imaging.

Authors:  Lin Yin; Zhen Cao; Kun Wang; Jie Tian; Xing Yang; Jianhua Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-05

6.  QuPath Digital Immunohistochemical Analysis of Placental Tissue.

Authors:  Ashley L Hein; Maheswari Mukherjee; Geoffrey A Talmon; Sathish Kumar Natarajan; Tara M Nordgren; Elizabeth Lyden; Corrine K Hanson; Jesse L Cox; Annelisse Santiago-Pintado; Mariam A Molani; Matthew Van Ormer; Maranda Thompson; Melissa Thoene; Aunum Akhter; Ann Anderson-Berry; Ana G Yuil-Valdes
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2021-11-01

Review 7.  Current Methods and Pipelines for Image-Based Quantitation of Nuclear Shape and Nuclear Envelope Abnormalities.

Authors:  Anne F J Janssen; Sophia Y Breusegem; Delphine Larrieu
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 6.600

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.