Literature DB >> 31063138

Artificial intelligence at the intersection of pathology and radiology in prostate cancer.

Stephnie A Harmon1, Sena Tuncer2, Thomas Sanford3, Peter L Choyke3, Barış Türkbey4.   

Abstract

Pathologic grading plays a key role in prostate cancer risk stratification and treatment selection, traditionally assessed from systemic core needle biopsies sampled throughout the prostate gland. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has become a well-established clinical tool for detecting and localizing prostate cancer. However, both pathologic and radiologic assessment suffer from poor reproducibility among readers. Artificial intelligence (AI) methods show promise in aiding the detection and assessment of imaging-based tasks, dependent on the curation of high-quality training sets. This review provides an overview of recent advances in AI applied to mpMRI and digital pathology in prostate cancer which enable advanced characterization of disease through combined radiology-pathology assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31063138      PMCID: PMC6521904          DOI: 10.5152/dir.2019.19125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1305-3825            Impact factor:   2.630


  69 in total

1.  Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist.

Authors:  W C Allsbrook; K A Mangold; M H Johnson; R B Lane; C G Lane; J I Epstein
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  Correlation of ADC and T2 measurements with cell density in prostate cancer at 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Peter Gibbs; Gary P Liney; Martin D Pickles; Bashar Zelhof; Greta Rodrigues; Lindsay W Turnbull
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 3.  The contemporary concept of significant versus insignificant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Guillaume Ploussard; Jonathan I Epstein; Rodolfo Montironi; Peter R Carroll; Manfred Wirth; Marc-Oliver Grimm; Anders S Bjartell; Francesco Montorsi; Stephen J Freedland; Andreas Erbersdobler; Theodorus H van der Kwast
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Is apparent diffusion coefficient associated with clinical risk scores for prostate cancers that are visible on 3-T MR images?

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Vijay P Shah; Yuxi Pang; Marcelino Bernardo; Sheng Xu; Jochen Kruecker; Julia Locklin; Angelo A Baccala; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Maria J Merino; Joanna H Shih; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Digital quantification of five high-grade prostate cancer patterns, including the cribriform pattern, and their association with adverse outcome.

Authors:  Kenneth A Iczkowski; Kathleen C Torkko; Gregory R Kotnis; R Storey Wilson; Wei Huang; Thomas M Wheeler; Andrea M Abeyta; Francisco G La Rosa; Shelly Cook; Priya N Werahera; M Scott Lucia
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer.

Authors:  Thomas Hambrock; Diederik M Somford; Henkjan J Huisman; Inge M van Oort; J Alfred Witjes; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Thomas Scheenen; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Prostate cancer epidemiology.

Authors:  Henrik Grönberg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-03-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Multifeature prostate cancer diagnosis and Gleason grading of histological images.

Authors:  Ali Tabesh; Mikhail Teverovskiy; Ho-Yuen Pang; Vinay P Kumar; David Verbel; Angeliki Kotsianti; Olivier Saidi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Apparent diffusion coefficient values in peripheral and transition zones of the prostate: comparison between normal and malignant prostatic tissues and correlation with histologic grade.

Authors:  Tsutomu Tamada; Teruki Sone; Yoshimasa Jo; Shinya Toshimitsu; Takenori Yamashita; Akira Yamamoto; Daigo Tanimoto; Katsuyoshi Ito
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Computer-aided identification of prostatic adenocarcinoma: Segmentation of glandular structures.

Authors:  Yahui Peng; Yulei Jiang; Laurie Eisengart; Mark A Healy; Francis H Straus; Ximing J Yang
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2011-07-26
View more
  15 in total

1.  Towards implementation of AI in New Zealand national diabetic screening program: Cloud-based, robust, and bespoke.

Authors:  Li Xie; Song Yang; David Squirrell; Ehsan Vaghefi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Radiomics with artificial intelligence: a practical guide for beginners.

Authors:  Burak Koçak; Emine Şebnem Durmaz; Ece Ateş; Özgür Kılıçkesmez
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 3.  Genomic and phenotypic heterogeneity in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael C Haffner; Wilbert Zwart; Martine P Roudier; Lawrence D True; William G Nelson; Jonathan I Epstein; Angelo M De Marzo; Peter S Nelson; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  A review on the use of artificial intelligence for medical imaging of the lungs of patients with coronavirus disease 2019.

Authors:  Rintaro Ito; Shingo Iwano; Shinji Naganawa
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 5.  Deep learning-based artificial intelligence applications in prostate MRI: brief summary.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Masoom A Haider
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of High Grade Cancer in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study.

Authors:  Michael A Liss; Lisa F Newcomb; Yingye Zheng; Michael P Garcia; Christopher P Filson; Hilary Boyer; James D Brooks; Peter R Carroll; Matthew R Cooperberg; William J Ellis; Martin E Gleave; Frances M Martin; Todd Morgan; Peter S Nelson; Andrew A Wagner; Ian M Thompson; Daniel W Lin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Challenges and opportunities for artificial intelligence in oncological imaging.

Authors:  H M C Cheung; D Rubin
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 3.389

Review 8.  The emergence of new trends in clinical laboratory diagnosis.

Authors:  Mohammed A Alaidarous
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 9.  Data-driven translational prostate cancer research: from biomarker discovery to clinical decision.

Authors:  Yuxin Lin; Xiaojun Zhao; Zhijun Miao; Zhixin Ling; Xuedong Wei; Jinxian Pu; Jianquan Hou; Bairong Shen
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 5.531

10.  Liver-specific 3D sectioning molds for correlating in vivo CT and MRI with tumor histopathology in woodchucks (Marmota monax).

Authors:  Andrew S Mikhail; Michal Mauda-Havakuk; Ari Partanen; John W Karanian; William F Pritchard; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.