Literature DB >> 23285542

Structure and context in prostatic gland segmentation and classification.

Kien Nguyen1, Anindya Sarkar, Anil K Jain.   

Abstract

A novel gland segmentation and classification scheme applied to an H&E histology image of the prostate tissue is proposed. For gland segmentation, we associate appropriate nuclei objects with each lumen object to create a gland segment. We further extract 22 features to describe the structural information and contextual information for each segment. These features are used to classify a gland segment into one of the three classes: artifact, normal gland and cancer gland. On a dataset of 48 images at 5x magnification (which includes 525 artifacts, 931 normal glands and 1,375 cancer glands), we achieved the following classification accuracies: 93% for artifacts v. true glands; 79% for normal v. cancer glands, and 77% for discriminating all three classes. The proposed method outperforms state of the art methods in terms of segmentation and classification accuracies and computational efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23285542     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33415-3_15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv


  15 in total

1.  A Multi-scale U-Net for Semantic Segmentation of Histological Images from Radical Prostatectomies.

Authors:  Jiayun Li; Karthik V Sarma; King Chung Ho; Arkadiusz Gertych; Beatrice S Knudsen; Corey W Arnold
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

2.  Evaluating stability of histomorphometric features across scanner and staining variations: prostate cancer diagnosis from whole slide images.

Authors:  Patrick Leo; George Lee; Natalie N C Shih; Robin Elliott; Michael D Feldman; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-10-24

3.  Gland segmentation in prostate histopathological images.

Authors:  Malay Singh; Emarene Mationg Kalaw; Danilo Medina Giron; Kian-Tai Chong; Chew Lim Tan; Hwee Kuan Lee
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-06-21

4.  Spatial Statistics for Segmenting Histological Structures in H&E Stained Tissue Images.

Authors:  Luong Nguyen; Akif Burak Tosun; Jeffrey L Fine; Adrian V Lee; D Lansing Taylor; S Chakra Chennubhotla
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Computer aided analysis of prostate histopathology images Gleason grading especially for Gleason score 7.

Authors:  Jian Ren; Evita T Sadimin; Daihou Wang; Jonathan I Epstein; David J Foran; Xin Qi
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2015

6.  Machine learning approaches to analyze histological images of tissues from radical prostatectomies.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Gertych; Nathan Ing; Zhaoxuan Ma; Thomas J Fuchs; Sadri Salman; Sambit Mohanty; Sanica Bhele; Adriana Velásquez-Vacca; Mahul B Amin; Beatrice S Knudsen
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 4.790

7.  An EM-based semi-supervised deep learning approach for semantic segmentation of histopathological images from radical prostatectomies.

Authors:  Jiayun Li; William Speier; King Chung Ho; Karthik V Sarma; Arkadiusz Gertych; Beatrice S Knudsen; Corey W Arnold
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 4.790

8.  Deep Multi-Magnification Networks for multi-class breast cancer image segmentation.

Authors:  David Joon Ho; Dig V K Yarlagadda; Timothy M D'Alfonso; Matthew G Hanna; Anne Grabenstetter; Peter Ntiamoah; Edi Brogi; Lee K Tan; Thomas J Fuchs
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.790

9.  A seeding-searching-ensemble method for gland segmentation in H&E-stained images.

Authors:  Yizhe Zhang; Lin Yang; John D MacKenzie; Rageshree Ramachandran; Danny Z Chen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Segmentation and classification of colon glands with deep convolutional neural networks and total variation regularization.

Authors:  Philipp Kainz; Michael Pfeiffer; Martin Urschler
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.