Literature DB >> 31420498

Tumor Subregion Evolution-Based Imaging Features to Assess Early Response and Predict Prognosis in Oropharyngeal Cancer.

Jia Wu1, Michael F Gensheimer1, Nasha Zhang1, Meiying Guo1, Rachel Liang1, Carrie Zhang1, Nancy Fischbein2, Erqi L Pollom1, Beth Beadle1, Quynh-Thu Le1, Ruijiang Li3.   

Abstract

The incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has been rapidly increasing. Disease stage and smoking history are often used in current clinical trials to select patients for deintensification therapy, but these features lack sufficient accuracy for predicting disease relapse. Our purpose was to develop an imaging signature to assess early response and predict outcomes of OPSCC.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 162 OPSCC patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, equally divided into separate training and validation cohorts with similar clinical characteristics. A robust consensus clustering approach was used to spatially partition the primary tumor and involved lymph nodes into subregions (i.e., habitats) based on 18F-FDG PET and contrast CT imaging. We proposed quantitative image features to characterize the temporal volumetric change of the habitats and peritumoral/nodal tissue between baseline and midtreatment. The reproducibility of these features was evaluated. We developed an imaging signature to predict progression-free survival (PFS) by fitting an L1-regularized Cox regression model.
Results: We identified 3 phenotypically distinct intratumoral habitats: metabolically active and heterogeneous, enhancing and heterogeneous, and metabolically inactive and homogeneous. The final Cox model consisted of 4 habitat evolution-based features. In both cohorts, this imaging signature significantly outperformed traditional imaging metrics, including midtreatment metabolic tumor volume for predicting PFS, with a C-index of 0.72 versus 0.67 (training) and 0.66 versus 0.56 (validation). The imaging signature stratified patients into high-risk versus low-risk groups with 2-y PFS rates of 59.1% versus 89.4% (hazard ratio, 4.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-13.4 [training]) and 61.4% versus 87.8% (hazard ratio, 4.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-12.1 [validation]). The imaging signature remained an independent predictor of PFS in multivariable analysis adjusting for stage, human papillomavirus status, and smoking history.
Conclusion: The proposed imaging signature allows more accurate prediction of disease progression and, if prospectively validated, may refine OPSCC patient selection for risk-adaptive therapy.
© 2020 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  early response; habitat evolution; intratumoral subregion; peritumoral interaction; prognostic biomarker

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31420498      PMCID: PMC7067523          DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.230037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  40 in total

1.  SLIC superpixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods.

Authors:  Radhakrishna Achanta; Appu Shaji; Kevin Smith; Aurelien Lucchi; Pascal Fua; Sabine Süsstrunk
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.226

2.  elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration.

Authors:  Stefan Klein; Marius Staring; Keelin Murphy; Max A Viergever; Josien P W Pluim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Development and validation of a staging system for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer by the International Collaboration on Oropharyngeal cancer Network for Staging (ICON-S): a multicentre cohort study.

Authors:  Brian O'Sullivan; Shao Hui Huang; Jie Su; Adam S Garden; Erich M Sturgis; Kristina Dahlstrom; Nancy Lee; Nadeem Riaz; Xin Pei; Shlomo A Koyfman; David Adelstein; Brian B Burkey; Jeppe Friborg; Claus A Kristensen; Anita B Gothelf; Frank Hoebers; Bernd Kremer; Ernst-Jan Speel; Daniel W Bowles; David Raben; Sana D Karam; Eugene Yu; Wei Xu
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Radiomics of CT Features May Be Nonreproducible and Redundant: Influence of CT Acquisition Parameters.

Authors:  Roberto Berenguer; María Del Rosario Pastor-Juan; Jesús Canales-Vázquez; Miguel Castro-García; María Victoria Villas; Francisco Mansilla Legorburo; Sebastià Sabater
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Identifying spatial imaging biomarkers of glioblastoma multiforme for survival group prediction.

Authors:  Mu Zhou; Baishali Chaudhury; Lawrence O Hall; Dmitry B Goldgof; Robert J Gillies; Robert A Gatenby
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  CT imaging during treatment improves radiomic models for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Stefan Leger; Alex Zwanenburg; Karoline Pilz; Sebastian Zschaeck; Klaus Zöphel; Jörg Kotzerke; Andreas Schreiber; Daniel Zips; Mechthild Krause; Michael Baumann; Esther G C Troost; Christian Richter; Steffen Löck
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Prognostic value of midtreatment FDG-PET in oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Erqi L Pollom; Jie Song; Benjamin Y Durkee; Sonya Aggarwal; Timothy Bui; Rie von Eyben; Ruijiang Li; David M Brizel; Billy W Loo; Quynh-Thu Le; Wendy Y Hara
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  Nivolumab for Recurrent Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.

Authors:  Robert L Ferris; George Blumenschein; Jerome Fayette; Joel Guigay; A Dimitrios Colevas; Lisa Licitra; Kevin Harrington; Stefan Kasper; Everett E Vokes; Caroline Even; Francis Worden; Nabil F Saba; Lara C Iglesias Docampo; Robert Haddad; Tamara Rordorf; Naomi Kiyota; Makoto Tahara; Manish Monga; Mark Lynch; William J Geese; Justin Kopit; James W Shaw; Maura L Gillison
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype.

Authors:  Joost J M van Griethuysen; Andriy Fedorov; Chintan Parmar; Ahmed Hosny; Nicole Aucoin; Vivek Narayan; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Steve Pieper; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Radiomics strategies for risk assessment of tumour failure in head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  Martin Vallières; Emily Kay-Rivest; Léo Jean Perrin; Xavier Liem; Christophe Furstoss; Hugo J W L Aerts; Nader Khaouam; Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tan; Chang-Shu Wang; Khalil Sultanem; Jan Seuntjens; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  8 in total

1.  Lesion-Based Radiomics Signature in Pretherapy 18F-FDG PET Predicts Treatment Response to Ibrutinib in Lymphoma.

Authors:  Jorge E Jimenez; Dong Dai; Guofan Xu; Ruiyang Zhao; Tengfei Li; Tinsu Pan; Linghua Wang; Yingyan Lin; Zhangyang Wang; David Jaffray; John D Hazle; Homer A Macapinlac; Jia Wu; Yang Lu
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 7.794

Review 2.  Integrated imaging and molecular analysis to decipher tumor microenvironment in the era of immunotherapy.

Authors:  Jia Wu; Aaron T Mayer; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 17.012

3.  Radiological tumor classification across imaging modality and histology.

Authors:  Jia Wu; Chao Li; Michael Gensheimer; Sukhmani Padda; Fumi Kato; Hiroki Shirato; Yiran Wei; Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb; Stephen John Price; David Jaffray; John Heymach; Joel W Neal; Billy W Loo; Heather Wakelee; Maximilian Diehn; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  Nat Mach Intell       Date:  2021-08-09

4.  Voxel-wise supervised analysis of tumors with multimodal engineered features to highlight interpretable biological patterns.

Authors:  Thibault Escobar; Sébastien Vauclin; Fanny Orlhac; Christophe Nioche; Pascal Pineau; Laurence Champion; Hervé Brisse; Irène Buvat
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.506

5.  Artificial intelligence in oncologic imaging.

Authors:  Melissa M Chen; Admir Terzic; Anton S Becker; Jason M Johnson; Carol C Wu; Max Wintermark; Christoph Wald; Jia Wu
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2022-09-29

Review 6.  The Biological Meaning of Radiomic Features.

Authors:  Michal R Tomaszewski; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Artificial intelligence in tumor subregion analysis based on medical imaging: A review.

Authors:  Mingquan Lin; Jacob F Wynne; Boran Zhou; Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Characterizing intra-tumor regions on quantitative ultrasound parametric images to predict breast cancer response to chemotherapy at pre-treatment.

Authors:  Hamidreza Taleghamar; Hadi Moghadas-Dastjerdi; Gregory J Czarnota; Ali Sadeghi-Naini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.