Literature DB >> 25494501

The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS).

Bjoern H Menze, Andras Jakab, Stefan Bauer, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, Keyvan Farahani, Justin Kirby, Yuliya Burren, Nicole Porz, Johannes Slotboom, Roland Wiest, Levente Lanczi, Elizabeth Gerstner, Marc-André Weber, Tal Arbel, Brian B Avants, Nicholas Ayache, Patricia Buendia, D Louis Collins, Nicolas Cordier, Jason J Corso, Antonio Criminisi, Tilak Das, Hervé Delingette, Çağatay Demiralp, Christopher R Durst, Michel Dojat, Senan Doyle, Joana Festa, Florence Forbes, Ezequiel Geremia, Ben Glocker, Polina Golland, Xiaotao Guo, Andac Hamamci, Khan M Iftekharuddin, Raj Jena, Nigel M John, Ender Konukoglu, Danial Lashkari, José Antonió Mariz, Raphael Meier, Sérgio Pereira, Doina Precup, Stephen J Price, Tammy Riklin Raviv, Syed M S Reza, Michael Ryan, Duygu Sarikaya, Lawrence Schwartz, Hoo-Chang Shin, Jamie Shotton, Carlos A Silva, Nuno Sousa, Nagesh K Subbanna, Gabor Szekely, Thomas J Taylor, Owen M Thomas, Nicholas J Tustison, Gozde Unal, Flor Vasseur, Max Wintermark, Dong Hye Ye, Liang Zhao, Binsheng Zhao, Darko Zikic, Marcel Prastawa, Mauricio Reyes, Koen Van Leemput.   

Abstract

In this paper we report the set-up and results of the Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS) organized in conjunction with the MICCAI 2012 and 2013 conferences. Twenty state-of-the-art tumor segmentation algorithms were applied to a set of 65 multi-contrast MR scans of low- and high-grade glioma patients-manually annotated by up to four raters-and to 65 comparable scans generated using tumor image simulation software. Quantitative evaluations revealed considerable disagreement between the human raters in segmenting various tumor sub-regions (Dice scores in the range 74%-85%), illustrating the difficulty of this task. We found that different algorithms worked best for different sub-regions (reaching performance comparable to human inter-rater variability), but that no single algorithm ranked in the top for all sub-regions simultaneously. Fusing several good algorithms using a hierarchical majority vote yielded segmentations that consistently ranked above all individual algorithms, indicating remaining opportunities for further methodological improvements. The BRATS image data and manual annotations continue to be publicly available through an online evaluation system as an ongoing benchmarking resource.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25494501      PMCID: PMC4833122          DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2014.2377694

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  83 in total

1.  Automatic segmentation of non-enhancing brain tumors in magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  L M Fletcher-Heath; L O Hall; D B Goldgof; F R Murtagh
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2001 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 5.326

2.  Correction for B(1) and B(0) variations in quantitative T(2) measurements using MRI.

Authors:  J G Sled; G B Pike
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Automated model-based bias field correction of MR images of the brain.

Authors:  K Van Leemput; F Maes; D Vandermeulen; P Suetens
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain.

Authors:  Bruce Fischl; David H Salat; Evelina Busa; Marilyn Albert; Megan Dieterich; Christian Haselgrove; Andre van der Kouwe; Ron Killiany; David Kennedy; Shuna Klaveness; Albert Montillo; Nikos Makris; Bruce Rosen; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Automated segmentation of MR images of brain tumors.

Authors:  M R Kaus; S K Warfield; A Nabavi; P M Black; F A Jolesz; R Kikinis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Progenitor cells and glioma formation.

Authors:  E C Holland
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.710

7.  New variants of a method of MRI scale standardization.

Authors:  L G Nyúl; J K Udupa; X Zhang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Automated segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions by model outlier detection.

Authors:  K Van Leemput; F Maes; D Vandermeulen; A Colchester; P Suetens
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index.

Authors:  Kelly H Zou; Simon K Warfield; Aditya Bharatha; Clare M C Tempany; Michael R Kaus; Steven J Haker; William M Wells; Ferenc A Jolesz; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Automatic brain tumor segmentation by subject specific modification of atlas priors.

Authors:  Marcel Prastawa; Elizabeth Bullitt; Nathan Moon; Koen Van Leemput; Guido Gerig
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.173

View more
  465 in total

1.  A Generative Probabilistic Model and Discriminative Extensions for Brain Lesion Segmentation--With Application to Tumor and Stroke.

Authors:  Bjoern H Menze; Koen Van Leemput; Danial Lashkari; Tammy Riklin-Raviv; Ezequiel Geremia; Esther Alberts; Philipp Gruber; Susanne Wegener; Marc-Andre Weber; Gabor Szekely; Nicholas Ayache; Polina Golland
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Within-brain classification for brain tumor segmentation.

Authors:  Mohammad Havaei; Hugo Larochelle; Philippe Poulin; Pierre-Marc Jodoin
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Longitudinal multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation: Resource and challenge.

Authors:  Aaron Carass; Snehashis Roy; Amod Jog; Jennifer L Cuzzocreo; Elizabeth Magrath; Adrian Gherman; Julia Button; James Nguyen; Ferran Prados; Carole H Sudre; Manuel Jorge Cardoso; Niamh Cawley; Olga Ciccarelli; Claudia A M Wheeler-Kingshott; Sébastien Ourselin; Laurence Catanese; Hrishikesh Deshpande; Pierre Maurel; Olivier Commowick; Christian Barillot; Xavier Tomas-Fernandez; Simon K Warfield; Suthirth Vaidya; Abhijith Chunduru; Ramanathan Muthuganapathy; Ganapathy Krishnamurthi; Andrew Jesson; Tal Arbel; Oskar Maier; Heinz Handels; Leonardo O Iheme; Devrim Unay; Saurabh Jain; Diana M Sima; Dirk Smeets; Mohsen Ghafoorian; Bram Platel; Ariel Birenbaum; Hayit Greenspan; Pierre-Louis Bazin; Peter A Calabresi; Ciprian M Crainiceanu; Lotta M Ellingsen; Daniel S Reich; Jerry L Prince; Dzung L Pham
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Artificial Intelligence in radiotherapy: state of the art and future directions.

Authors:  Giulio Francolini; Isacco Desideri; Giulia Stocchi; Viola Salvestrini; Lucia Pia Ciccone; Pietro Garlatti; Mauro Loi; Lorenzo Livi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 5.  Challenges in diffusion MRI tractography - Lessons learned from international benchmark competitions.

Authors:  Kurt G Schilling; Alessandro Daducci; Klaus Maier-Hein; Cyril Poupon; Jean-Christophe Houde; Vishwesh Nath; Adam W Anderson; Bennett A Landman; Maxime Descoteaux
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Brain Cancer Imaging Phenomics Toolkit (brain-CaPTk): An Interactive Platform for Quantitative Analysis of Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Saima Rathore; Spyridon Bakas; Sarthak Pati; Hamed Akbari; Ratheesh Kalarot; Patmaa Sridharan; Martin Rozycki; Mark Bergman; Birkan Tunc; Ragini Verma; Michel Bilello; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Brainlesion       Date:  2018-02-17

7.  Segmentation of Gliomas in Pre-operative and Post-operative Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Volumes Based on a Hybrid Generative-Discriminative Framework.

Authors:  Ke Zeng; Spyridon Bakas; Aristeidis Sotiras; Hamed Akbari; Martin Rozycki; Saima Rathore; Sarthak Pati; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Brainlesion       Date:  2017-04-12

8.  GLISTRboost: Combining Multimodal MRI Segmentation, Registration, and Biophysical Tumor Growth Modeling with Gradient Boosting Machines for Glioma Segmentation.

Authors:  Spyridon Bakas; Ke Zeng; Aristeidis Sotiras; Saima Rathore; Hamed Akbari; Bilwaj Gaonkar; Martin Rozycki; Sarthak Pati; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Brainlesion       Date:  2016

9.  Deep Learning and Texture-Based Semantic Label Fusion for Brain Tumor Segmentation.

Authors:  L Vidyaratne; M Alam; Z Shboul; K M Iftekharuddin
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2018-02-27

10.  Learning joint segmentation of tissues and brain lesions from task-specific hetero-modal domain-shifted datasets.

Authors:  Reuben Dorent; Thomas Booth; Wenqi Li; Carole H Sudre; Sina Kafiabadi; Jorge Cardoso; Sebastien Ourselin; Tom Vercauteren
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 8.545

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.