Literature DB >> 23392431

MR imaging predictors of molecular profile and survival: multi-institutional study of the TCGA glioblastoma data set.

David A Gutman1, Lee A D Cooper, Scott N Hwang, Chad A Holder, Jingjing Gao, Tarun D Aurora, William D Dunn, Lisa Scarpace, Tom Mikkelsen, Rajan Jain, Max Wintermark, Manal Jilwan, Prashant Raghavan, Erich Huang, Robert J Clifford, Pattanasak Mongkolwat, Vladimir Kleper, John Freymann, Justin Kirby, Pascal O Zinn, Carlos S Moreno, Carl Jaffe, Rivka Colen, Daniel L Rubin, Joel Saltz, Adam Flanders, Daniel J Brat.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To conduct a comprehensive analysis of radiologist-made assessments of glioblastoma (GBM) tumor size and composition by using a community-developed controlled terminology of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging visual features as they relate to genetic alterations, gene expression class, and patient survival.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Because all study patients had been previously deidentified by the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), a publicly available data set that contains no linkage to patient identifiers and that is HIPAA compliant, no institutional review board approval was required. Presurgical MR images of 75 patients with GBM with genetic data in the TCGA portal were rated by three neuroradiologists for size, location, and tumor morphology by using a standardized feature set. Interrater agreements were analyzed by using the Krippendorff α statistic and intraclass correlation coefficient. Associations between survival, tumor size, and morphology were determined by using multivariate Cox regression models; associations between imaging features and genomics were studied by using the Fisher exact test.
RESULTS: Interrater analysis showed significant agreement in terms of contrast material enhancement, nonenhancement, necrosis, edema, and size variables. Contrast-enhanced tumor volume and longest axis length of tumor were strongly associated with poor survival (respectively, hazard ratio: 8.84, P = .0253, and hazard ratio: 1.02, P = .00973), even after adjusting for Karnofsky performance score (P = .0208). Proneural class GBM had significantly lower levels of contrast enhancement (P = .02) than other subtypes, while mesenchymal GBM showed lower levels of nonenhanced tumor (P < .01).
CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrates a method for consistent image feature annotation capable of reproducibly characterizing brain tumors; this study shows that radiologists' estimations of macroscopic imaging features can be combined with genetic alterations and gene expression subtypes to provide deeper insight to the underlying biologic properties of GBM subsets. © RSNA, 2013.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23392431      PMCID: PMC3632807          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13120118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  20 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of preoperative MRI scans in glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  M A Hammoud; R Sawaya; W Shi; P F Thall; N E Leeds
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  The Annotation and Image Mark-up project.

Authors:  David S Channin; Pattanasak Mongkolwat; Vladimir Kleper; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Prognostic significance of contrast-enhancing anaplastic astrocytomas in adults.

Authors:  Kaisorn L Chaichana; Thomas Kosztowski; Ashwini Niranjan; Alessandro Olivi; Jon D Weingart; John Laterra; Henry Brem; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Molecular subclasses of high-grade glioma predict prognosis, delineate a pattern of disease progression, and resemble stages in neurogenesis.

Authors:  Heidi S Phillips; Samir Kharbanda; Ruihuan Chen; William F Forrest; Robert H Soriano; Thomas D Wu; Anjan Misra; Janice M Nigro; Howard Colman; Liliana Soroceanu; P Mickey Williams; Zora Modrusan; Burt G Feuerstein; Ken Aldape
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 31.743

5.  Recursive partitioning analysis of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group malignant glioma trials.

Authors:  W J Curran; C B Scott; J Horton; J S Nelson; A S Weinstein; A J Fischbach; C H Chang; M Rotman; S O Asbell; R E Krisch
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-05-05       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Relationship between gene expression and enhancement in glioblastoma multiforme: exploratory DNA microarray analysis.

Authors:  Whitney B Pope; Jenny H Chen; Jun Dong; Marc R J Carlson; Alla Perlina; Timothy F Cloughesy; Linda M Liau; Paul S Mischel; Phioanh Nghiemphu; Albert Lai; Stanley F Nelson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Identification of noninvasive imaging surrogates for brain tumor gene-expression modules.

Authors:  Maximilian Diehn; Christine Nardini; David S Wang; Susan McGovern; Mahesh Jayaraman; Yu Liang; Kenneth Aldape; Soonmee Cha; Michael D Kuo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Necrosis as a prognostic factor in glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  F G Barker; R L Davis; S M Chang; M D Prados
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Radiogenomic mapping of edema/cellular invasion MRI-phenotypes in glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Pascal O Zinn; Bhanu Mahajan; Bhanu Majadan; Pratheesh Sathyan; Sanjay K Singh; Sadhan Majumder; Ferenc A Jolesz; Rivka R Colen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The caBIG annotation and image Markup project.

Authors:  David S Channin; Pattanasak Mongkolwat; Vladimir Kleper; Kastubh Sepukar; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.056

View more
  167 in total

1.  Integrative analysis of diffusion-weighted MRI and genomic data to inform treatment of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Guido H Jajamovich; Chandni R Valiathan; Razvan Cristescu; Sangeetha Somayajula
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Computer-extracted MR imaging features are associated with survival in glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Maciej A Mazurowski; Jing Zhang; Katherine B Peters; Hasan Hobbs
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  MR imaging phenotype correlates with extent of genome-wide copy number abundance in IDH mutant gliomas.

Authors:  Chih-Chun Wu; Rajan Jain; Lucidio Neto; Seema Patel; Laila M Poisson; Jonathan Serrano; Victor Ng; Sohil H Patel; Dimitris G Placantonakis; David Zagzag; John Golfinos; Andrew S Chi; Matija Snuderl
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Imaging-based observational databases for clinical problem solving: the role of informatics.

Authors:  Alex A T Bui; William Hsu; Corey Arnold; Suzie El-Saden; Denise R Aberle; Ricky K Taira
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Biomedical imaging informatics in the era of precision medicine: progress, challenges, and opportunities.

Authors:  William Hsu; Mia K Markey; May D Wang
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 6.  Towards precision medicine: from quantitative imaging to radiomics.

Authors:  U Rajendra Acharya; Yuki Hagiwara; Vidya K Sudarshan; Wai Yee Chan; Kwan Hoong Ng
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2018 Jan.       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 7.  Imaging in StrokeNet: Realizing the Potential of Big Data.

Authors:  David S Liebeskind; Gregory W Albers; Karen Crawford; Colin P Derdeyn; Mark S George; Yuko Y Palesch; Arthur W Toga; Steven Warach; Wenle Zhao; Thomas G Brott; Ralph L Sacco; Pooja Khatri; Jeffrey L Saver; Steven C Cramer; Steven L Wolf; Joseph P Broderick; Max Wintermark
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Quantitative Imaging Network: Data Sharing and Competitive AlgorithmValidation Leveraging The Cancer Imaging Archive.

Authors:  Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; John Blake Freymann; Justin Stephen Kirby; Paul Eugene Kinahan; Fred William Prior
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

9.  Radiogenomics correlation between MR imaging features and major genetic profiles in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Eun Kyoung Hong; Seung Hong Choi; Dong Jae Shin; Sang Won Jo; Roh-Eul Yoo; Koung Mi Kang; Tae Jin Yun; Ji-Hoon Kim; Chul-Ho Sohn; Sung-Hye Park; Jae-Kyung Won; Tae Min Kim; Chul-Kee Park; Il Han Kim; Soon Tae Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Multi-Channel 3D Deep Feature Learning for Survival Time Prediction of Brain Tumor Patients Using Multi-Modal Neuroimages.

Authors:  Dong Nie; Junfeng Lu; Han Zhang; Ehsan Adeli; Jun Wang; Zhengda Yu; LuYan Liu; Qian Wang; Jinsong Wu; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.