Literature DB >> 24062559

Quantitative imaging in cancer evolution and ecology.

Robert A Gatenby1, Olya Grove, Robert J Gillies.   

Abstract

Cancer therapy, even when highly targeted, typically fails because of the remarkable capacity of malignant cells to evolve effective adaptations. These evolutionary dynamics are both a cause and a consequence of cancer system heterogeneity at many scales, ranging from genetic properties of individual cells to large-scale imaging features. Tumors of the same organ and cell type can have remarkably diverse appearances in different patients. Furthermore, even within a single tumor, marked variations in imaging features, such as necrosis or contrast enhancement, are common. Similar spatial variations recently have been reported in genetic profiles. Radiologic heterogeneity within tumors is usually governed by variations in blood flow, whereas genetic heterogeneity is typically ascribed to random mutations. However, evolution within tumors, as in all living systems, is subject to Darwinian principles; thus, it is governed by predictable and reproducible interactions between environmental selection forces and cell phenotype (not genotype). This link between regional variations in environmental properties and cellular adaptive strategies may permit clinical imaging to be used to assess and monitor intratumoral evolution in individual patients. This approach is enabled by new methods that extract, report, and analyze quantitative, reproducible, and mineable clinical imaging data. However, most current quantitative metrics lack spatialness, expressing quantitative radiologic features as a single value for a region of interest encompassing the whole tumor. In contrast, spatially explicit image analysis recognizes that tumors are heterogeneous but not well mixed and defines regionally distinct habitats, some of which appear to harbor tumor populations that are more aggressive and less treatable than others. By identifying regional variations in key environmental selection forces and evidence of cellular adaptation, clinical imaging can enable us to define intratumoral Darwinian dynamics before and during therapy. Advances in image analysis will place clinical imaging in an increasingly central role in the development of evolution-based patient-specific cancer therapy. © RSNA, 2013.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24062559      PMCID: PMC3781355          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13122697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  45 in total

1.  Mapping LIDC, RadLex™, and lung nodule image features.

Authors:  Pia Opulencia; David S Channin; Daniela S Raicu; Jacob D Furst
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Informatics methods to enable sharing of quantitative imaging research data.

Authors:  Mia A Levy; John B Freymann; Justin S Kirby; Andriy Fedorov; Fiona M Fennessy; Steven A Eschrich; Anders E Berglund; David A Fenstermacher; Yongqiang Tan; Xiaotao Guo; Thomas L Casavant; Bartley J Brown; Terry A Braun; Andre Dekker; Erik Roelofs; James M Mountz; Fernando Boada; Charles Laymon; Matt Oborski; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  The Annotation and Image Mark-up project.

Authors:  David S Channin; Pattanasak Mongkolwat; Vladimir Kleper; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Tumour heterogeneity in non-small cell lung carcinoma assessed by CT texture analysis: a potential marker of survival.

Authors:  Balaji Ganeshan; Elleny Panayiotou; Kate Burnand; Sabina Dizdarevic; Ken Miles
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Modeling microbial community structure and functional diversity across time and space.

Authors:  Peter E Larsen; Sean M Gibbons; Jack A Gilbert
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 2.742

6.  Prognostic PET 18F-FDG uptake imaging features are associated with major oncogenomic alterations in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Viswam S Nair; Olivier Gevaert; Guido Davidzon; Sandy Napel; Edward E Graves; Chuong D Hoang; Joseph B Shrager; Andrew Quon; Daniel L Rubin; Sylvia K Plevritis
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Factor analysis of medical image sequences in MR of head and neck tumors.

Authors:  A M Zagdanski; R Sigal; J Bosq; J P Bazin; D Vanel; R Di Paola
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Identification of noninvasive imaging surrogates for brain tumor gene-expression modules.

Authors:  Maximilian Diehn; Christine Nardini; David S Wang; Susan McGovern; Mahesh Jayaraman; Yu Liang; Kenneth Aldape; Soonmee Cha; Michael D Kuo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Cancer genome sequencing: understanding malignancy as a disease of the genome, its conformation, and its evolution.

Authors:  Lalit R Patel; Matti Nykter; Kexin Chen; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 10.  A microenvironmental model of carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Robert A Gatenby; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 60.716

View more
  162 in total

1.  Predicting adenocarcinoma recurrence using computational texture models of nodule components in lung CT.

Authors:  Adrien Depeursinge; Masahiro Yanagawa; Ann N Leung; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Short-term reproducibility of radiomic features in liver parenchyma and liver malignancies on contrast-enhanced CT imaging.

Authors:  Thomas Perrin; Abhishek Midya; Rikiya Yamashita; Jayasree Chakraborty; Tome Saidon; William R Jarnagin; Mithat Gonen; Amber L Simpson; Richard K G Do
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-12

Review 3.  The Evolution and Ecology of Resistance in Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Robert Gatenby; Joel Brown
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 4.  Acidosis and cancer: from mechanism to neutralization.

Authors:  Arig Ibrahim-Hashim; Veronica Estrella
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 9.264

5.  Dual-energy CT: a phantom comparison of different platforms for abdominal imaging.

Authors:  Thorsten Sellerer; Peter B Noël; Manuel Patino; Anushri Parakh; Sebastian Ehn; Sascha Zeiter; Jasmin A Holz; Johannes Hammel; Alexander A Fingerle; Franz Pfeiffer; David Maintz; Ernst J Rummeny; Daniela Muenzel; Dushyant V Sahani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Review of quantitative multiscale imaging of breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael A Pinkert; Lonie R Salkowski; Patricia J Keely; Timothy J Hall; Walter F Block; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-01-22

7.  Radiologically defined ecological dynamics and clinical outcomes in glioblastoma multiforme: preliminary results.

Authors:  Mu Zhou; Lawrence Hall; Dmitry Goldgof; Robin Russo; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Robert Gillies; Robert Gatenby
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

8.  New approach in lung cancer radiotherapy offers better normal tissue sparing.

Authors:  Ivaylo B Mihaylov
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  An Automated Multiparametric MRI Quantitative Imaging Prostate Habitat Risk Scoring System for Defining External Beam Radiation Therapy Boost Volumes.

Authors:  Radka Stoyanova; Felix Chinea; Deukwoo Kwon; Isildinha M Reis; Yohann Tschudi; Nestor A Parra; Adrian L Breto; Kyle R Padgett; Alan Dal Pra; Matthew C Abramowitz; Oleksandr N Kryvenko; Sanoj Punnen; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 10.  Targeting acidity in cancer and diabetes.

Authors:  Robert J Gillies; Christian Pilot; Yoshinori Marunaka; Stefano Fais
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 10.680

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.