| Literature DB >> 26347886 |
Maryam B Khadzhieva1, Dmitry S Kolobkov2, Svetlana V Kamoeva3, Anastasia V Ivanova3, Serikbay K Abilev1, Lyubov E Salnikova4.
Abstract
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common highly disabling disorder with a large hereditary component. It is characterized by a loss of pelvic floor support that leads to the herniation of the uterus in or outside the vagina. Genome-wide linkage studies have shown an evidence of POP association with the region 9q21 and six other loci in European pedigrees. The aim of our study was to test the above associations in a case-control study in Russian population. Twelve SNPs including SNPs cited in the above studies and those selected using the RegulomeDB annotations for the region 9q21 were genotyped in 210 patients with POP (stages III-IV) and 292 controls with no even minimal POP. Genotyping was performed using the polymerase chain reaction with confronting two-pair primers (PCR-CTPP). Association analyses were conducted for individual SNPs, 9q21 haplotypes, and SNP-SNP interactions. SNP rs12237222 with the highest RegulomeDB score 1a appeared to be the key SNP in haplotypes associated with POP. Other RegulomeDB Category 1 SNPs, rs12551710 and rs2236479 (scores 1d and 1f, resp.), exhibited epistatic effects. In this study, we verified the region 9q21 association with POP in Russians, using RegulomeDB annotations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26347886 PMCID: PMC4546950 DOI: 10.1155/2015/837904
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
SNPs considered in this study.
| rs | Chromosome region | Chromosome position | Gene | Function | RegulomeDB score | Alleles | MAF (Allele) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs1455311 | 4q21 | 79964587 |
| Intron | 5 | C:T | 0.217 (C) |
| rs1036819 | 8q24 | 135611945 |
| NearGene-3 | 4 | A:C | 0.128 (C) |
| rs4077632 | 9q21 | 81163473 | — | — | No data | A:G | 0.310 (G) |
| rs2807303 | 9q21 | 82187095 |
| NearGene-5 | 2a | C:T | 0.336 (T) |
| rs2777781 | 9q21 | 84215034 |
| Intron | 3a | A:T | 0.309 (T) |
| rs11139451 | 9q21 | 84495608 | — | — | 5 | C:T | 0.221 (C) |
| rs12237222 | 9q21 | 85834743 |
| Intron | 1a | G:T | 0.425 (G) |
| rs12551710 | 9q21 | 86088295 |
| Intron | 1d | C:T | 0.042 (T) |
| rs430794 | 9q22 | 93852815 | — | — | 5 | A:C | 0.272 (A) |
| rs8027714 | 15q11 | 24964597 | — | — | 6 | A:G | 0.040 (A) |
| rs1810636 | 20p13 | 2654925 | — | — | 4 | G:T | 0.332 (T) |
| rs2236479 | 21q22 | 46919132 |
| Intron | 1f | A:G | 0.339 (A) |
The distribution of RegulomeDB category 1a–1f SNPs in the whole human genome and in the region 9q21.
| RegulomeDB category | Category description | Number of SNPs with RegulomeDB score 1a–1f | |
|---|---|---|---|
| In the whole human genome | In the region 9q21 | ||
| 1a | eQTL + TF binding + matched TF motif + matched DNase footprint + DNase peak | 352 | 1 |
| 1b | eQTL + TF binding + any motif + DNase footprint + DNase peak | 2568 | 17 |
| 1c | eQTL + TF binding + matched TF motif + DNase peak | 85 | 0 |
| 1d | eQTL + TF binding + any motif + DNase peak | 1668 | 7 |
| 1e | eQTL + TF binding + matched TF motif | 54 | 0 |
| 1f | eQTL + TF binding/DNase peak | 34706 | 127 |
The distribution of rs12237222 genotypes among cases and controls.
| Genotypes | Control | POP |
Crude |
Adjusted | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number (%) | HWP | Number (%) | HWP | |||
| rs12237222 | ||||||
| T/T | 104 (35.7) | 0.63 | 55 (26.2) | 0.21 | 0.023 (dom) | 0.12 (dom) |
| T/G | 136 (46.7) | 114 (54.3) | ||||
| G/G | 51 (17.5) | 41 (19.5) | ||||
HWP: Hardy-Weinberg probability; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; dom: dominant model.
aAdjusted by age, body mass index (BMI), perineal trauma in childbirth, and vaginal parity. In multivariate analysis, there were 271 controls and 198 cases.
The distribution of 9q21 haplotypes among cases and controls.
| Number | rs4077632 | rs2807303 | rs2777781 | rs11139451 | rs12237222 | rs12551710 | Frequencies |
| OR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls | POP | |||||||||
| Six SNP-haplotype associations with response | ||||||||||
| 1 | A | T | A | T | T | C | 0.1334 | 0.0985 | — | 1.00 |
| 2 | A | C | A | T | T | C | 0.1185 | 0.0943 | 0.38 | 0.59 (0.19–1.90) |
| 3 | G | C | A | T | G | C | 0.0436 | 0.0937 | 0.24 | 1.92 (0.65–5.71) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
| Five SNP-haplotype associations with response | ||||||||||
| 1 | A | C | A | T | — | C | 0.1807 | 0.205 | — | 1.00 |
| 2 | A | T | A | T | — | C | 0.1662 | 0.1324 | 0.96 | 1.02 (0.48–2.16) |
| 3 | G | C | A | T | — | C | 0.1146 | 0.1171 | 0.68 | 0.85 (0.39–1.86) |
| 4 | A | C | T | T | — | C | 0.0949 | 0.0763 | 0.63 | 0.81 (0.34–1.92) |
|
| ||||||||||
| Two SNP-haplotype associations with response | ||||||||||
| 1 | — | — | A | — | T | — | 0.4581 | 0.3663 | — | 1.00 |
|
| — | — |
| — |
| — | 0.2782 | 0.3575 |
|
|
| 3 | — | — | T | — | T | — | 0.1328 | 0.167 | 0.064 | 1.62 (0.97–2.70) |
| 4 | — | — | T | — | G | — | 0.1309 | 0.1092 | 0.63 | 0.88 (0.53–1.47) |
Only haplotypes with total frequencies ≥10% are considered. Analysis is adjusted by age, body mass index (BMI), peritoneal trauma in childbirth, and vaginal parity. Significant results are in bold.
Figure 1Gene-gene interaction plot. The plot shows the significance levels of gene-gene interactions and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in the dominant model. Each plot indicated the P values preceded by different likelihood ratio tests. Different colors show different levels of statistical significance. The diagonal line contains the P values from likelihood ratio test for the crude effect of each SNP. The upper triangle in the matrix presents the P values for the interaction (epistasis) log-likelihood ratio test. The lower triangle shows the P values from likelihood ratio test comparing the two-SNP additive likelihood to the best of the single-SNP models.
Figure 2Structure analysis of 12 SNPs in this data (RUS) and in other Caucasian populations (CEU, Utah residents from Northern and Western European and TSI, Toscans from Italy), Asian populations (CHD, Chinese from Metropolitan Denver, Colorado, and JPT, Japanese from Tokyo), African populations (YRI, Yoruba from Ibadan, Nigeria, and LWK, Luhya from Webuye, Kenya), and two other populations (GIH, Gujarati Indians from Houston, Texas, and MEX, Mexican ancestry in Los Angeles, California). Only female samples were included in a principal component analysis. HapMap data were absent in TSI, MEX, GIH, CHD, and LWK populations for rs1223722 and rs12551710 and in CHD population for rs8027714.