Literature DB >> 18799443

Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women.

Ingrid Nygaard1, Matthew D Barber, Kathryn L Burgio, Kimberly Kenton, Susan Meikle, Joseph Schaffer, Cathie Spino, William E Whitehead, Jennifer Wu, Debra J Brody.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Pelvic floor disorders (urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, and pelvic organ prolapse) affect many women. No national prevalence estimates derived from the same population-based sample exists for multiple pelvic floor disorders in women in the United States.
OBJECTIVE: To provide national prevalence estimates of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional analysis of 1961 nonpregnant women (>or=20 years) who participated in the 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a nationally representative survey of the US noninstitutionalized population. Women were interviewed in their homes and then underwent standardized physical examinations in a mobile examination center. Urinary incontinence (score of >or=3 on a validated incontinence severity index, constituting moderate to severe leakage), fecal incontinence (at least monthly leakage of solid, liquid, or mucous stool), and pelvic organ prolapse (seeing/feeling a bulge in or outside the vagina) symptoms were assessed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Weighted prevalence estimates of urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, and pelvic organ prolapse symptoms.
RESULTS: The weighted prevalence of at least 1 pelvic floor disorder was 23.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.2%-26.2%), with 15.7% of women (95% CI, 13.2%-18.2%) experiencing urinary incontinence, 9.0% of women (95% CI, 7.3%-10.7%) experiencing fecal incontinence, and 2.9% of women (95% CI, 2.1%-3.7%) experiencing pelvic organ prolapse. The proportion of women reporting at least 1 disorder increased incrementally with age, ranging from 9.7% (95% CI, 7.8%-11.7%) in women between ages 20 and 39 years to 49.7% (95% CI, 40.3%-59.1%) in those aged 80 years or older (P < .001), and parity (12.8% [95% CI, 9.0%-16.6%], 18.4% [95% CI, 12.9%-23.9%], 24.6% [95% CI, 19.5%-29.8%], and 32.4% [95% CI, 27.8%-37.1%] for 0, 1, 2, and 3 or more deliveries, respectively; P < .001). Overweight and obese women were more likely to report at least 1 pelvic floor disorder than normal weight women (26.3% [95% CI, 21.7%-30.9%], 30.4% [95% CI, 25.8%-35.0%], and 15.1% [95% CI, 11.6%-18.7%], respectively; P < .001). We detected no differences in prevalence by racial/ethnic group.
CONCLUSION: Pelvic floor disorders affect a substantial proportion of women and increase with age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18799443      PMCID: PMC2918416          DOI: 10.1001/jama.300.11.1311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  39 in total

1.  Parity, mode of delivery, and pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  Emily S Lukacz; Jean M Lawrence; Richard Contreras; Charles W Nager; Karl M Luber
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Can we screen for pelvic organ prolapse without a physical examination in epidemiologic studies?

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Nikki L Neubauer; Victoria Klein-Olarte
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index.

Authors:  T H Rockwood; J M Church; J W Fleshman; R L Kane; C Mavrantonis; A G Thorson; S D Wexner; D Bliss; A C Lowry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Epidemiology of genital prolapse: observations from the Oxford Family Planning Association Study.

Authors:  J Mant; R Painter; M Vessey
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1997-05

5.  Vaginal wall descensus and pelvic floor symptoms in older women.

Authors:  Catherine S Bradley; Ingrid E Nygaard
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  The prevalence of urinary incontinence among community dwelling adult women: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Jennifer Tash Anger; Christopher S Saigal; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Differences in prevalence of urinary incontinence by race/ethnicity.

Authors:  David H Thom; Stephen K van den Eeden; Arona I Ragins; Christina Wassel-Fyr; Eric Vittinghof; Leslee L Subak; Jeanette S Brown
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A L Olsen; V J Smith; J O Bergstrom; J C Colling; A L Clark
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Fecal incontinence in females older than aged 40 years: who is at risk?

Authors:  Madhulika G Varma; Jeanette S Brown; Jennifer M Creasman; David H Thom; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Mary S Beattie; Leslee L Subak
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Validity of the incontinence severity index: comparison with pad-weighing tests.

Authors:  Hogne Sandvik; Montserrat Espuna; Steinar Hunskaar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-03-18
View more
  456 in total

1.  Validation of a global pelvic floor symptom bother questionnaire.

Authors:  Thais V Peterson; Deborah R Karp; Vivian C Aguilar; G Willy Davila
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Medium-term clinical outcomes following surgical repair for vaginal prolapse with tension-free mesh and vaginal support device.

Authors:  T Sayer; J Lim; J M Gauld; P Hinoul; P Jones; N Franco; D Van Drie; M Slack
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Development of a wireless intra-vaginal transducer for monitoring intra-abdominal pressure in women.

Authors:  Tanner J Coleman; Jens C Thomsen; Sean D Maass; Yvonne Hsu; Ingrid E Nygaard; Robert W Hitchcock
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.838

4.  Incidence and risk factors for fecal incontinence in black and white older adults: a population-based study.

Authors:  Alayne D Markland; Patricia S Goode; Kathryn L Burgio; David T Redden; Holly E Richter; Patricia Sawyer; Richard M Allman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Epidemiologic Trends and Diagnostic Evaluation of Fecal Incontinence.

Authors:  Amol Sharma; Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2020-06

6.  Does a ring pessary in situ influence the pelvic floor muscle function of women with pelvic organ prolapse when tested in supine?

Authors:  Kari Bø; Memona Majida; Marie Ellstrøm Engh
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Evaluation of current synthetic mesh materials in pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Prashanth Kanagarajah; Rajinikanth Ayyathurai; Christopher Gomez
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Pelvic floor symptoms and bone mineral density in women undergoing osteoporosis evaluation.

Authors:  Holly E Richter; Sarah L Morgan; Jonathan L Gleason; Jeff M Szychowski; Patricia S Goode; Kathryn L Burgio
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Risk factors for fecal incontinence in older women.

Authors:  Mary K Townsend; Catherine A Matthews; William E Whitehead; Francine Grodstein
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Does concomitant anterior/apical repair during midurethral sling improve the overactive bladder component of mixed incontinence?

Authors:  Alexis A Dieter; Autumn L Edenfield; Alison C Weidner; Pamela J Levin; Nazema Y Siddiqui
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.