| Literature DB >> 26339290 |
Mei Liu1, Kenneth M Bischoff2, Jason J Gill3, Miranda D Mire-Criscione1, Joel D Berry4, Ry Young5, Elizabeth J Summer1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Contamination of corn mash by lactic acid bacteria (LAB) reduces the efficiency of the ethanol fermentation process. The industry relies heavily on antibiotics for contamination control and there is a need to develop alternative methods. The goals of this study were to determine the diversity and abundance of bacteria contaminating commercial ethanol fermentations, and to evaluate the potential of anti-LAB bacteriophages in controlling production losses.Entities:
Keywords: Bacteriophage; Ethanol fermentation; Lactic acid bacteria; Lactobacillus fermentum
Year: 2015 PMID: 26339290 PMCID: PMC4558781 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-015-0325-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Bacterial population diversity at early, mid, and late fermentation stages in nine different commercial ethanol plants
| Plant | Fermentation stage (hours) | Bacteria level (CFU/g) | # of total OTU | # of LAB OTU |
|
|
|
|
|
| Total LAB (%)a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | NA | 68 | 7 | 36.10 | 36.10 | |||||
| 24 | NA | 98 | 12 | 91.91 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 91.94 | ||||
| 52 | NA | 21 | 6 | 91.09 | 0.78 | 91.87 | |||||
| 2 | 25 | 4.4E+07 | 16 | 10 | 5.78 | 0.51 | 0.65 | 92.22 | 0.07 | 99.23 | |
| 34 | 1.9E+07 | 15 | 10 | 3.62 | 0.61 | 0.47 | 79.50 | 0.10 | 84.30 | ||
| 43 | 9.4E+06 | 15 | 12 | 16.09 | 9.98 | 3.42 | 70.10 | 99.59 | |||
| 3 | 15 | 8.6E+04 | 30 | 21 | 4.53 | 0.18 | 63.08 | 30.34 | 0.02 | 98.15 | |
| 30 | 3.6E+04 | 19 | 10 | 47.36 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 39.58 | 87.64 | |||
| 45 | 1.7E+04 | 24 | 9 | 16.54 | 0.44 | 75.51 | 92.49 | ||||
| 4 | 9 | 1.6E+07 | 55 | 15 | 7.32 | 4.93 | 0.66 | 11.86 | 24.77 | ||
| 27 | 1.8E+06 | 19 | 13 | 54.70 | 25.07 | 0.33 | 18.47 | 98.57 | |||
| 45 | 7.8E+04 | 17 | 11 | 82.66 | 8.92 | 1.48 | 5.85 | 98.91 | |||
| 5 | 18 | 1.2E+07 | 11 | 8 | 40.64 | 58.42 | 0.64 | 0.07 | 99.77 | ||
| 32 | 1.8E+06 | 18 | 9 | 75.00 | 23.51 | 0.06 | 98.57 | ||||
| 45 | 8.6E+05 | 14 | 5 | 70.55 | 2.47 | 25.60 | 98.62 | ||||
| 6 | 8 | 5.6E+05 | 18 | 17 | 28.56 | 69.03 | 0.75 | 98.34 | |||
| 26 | 2.5E+05 | 26 | 18 | 81.77 | 8.84 | 5.11 | 0.41 | 96.13 | |||
| 34 | 1.0E+07 | 12 | 11 | 93.71 | 6.18 | 99.89 | |||||
| 7 | 15 | 4.4E+03 | 25 | 7 | 13.15 | 4.21 | 46.31 | 0.52 | 3.16 | 67.35 | |
| 34 | 2.8E+05 | 41 | 9 | 39.46 | 5.54 | 5.54 | 50.54 | ||||
| 42 | 2.8E+04 | 18 | 6 | 17.61 | 1.14 | 68.47 | 87.22 | ||||
| 8 | 17 | 2.2E+06 | 7 | 7 | 2.31 | 97.54 | 99.85 | ||||
| 35 | 7.8E+05 | 8 | 5 | 67.46 | 22.81 | 9.20 | 99.47 | ||||
| 54 | 7.0E+03 | 14 | 9 | 38.86 | 23.45 | 36.40 | 98.71 | ||||
| 9 | 6 | 3.0E+05 | 23 | 8 | 14.20 | 0.71 | 41.84 | 56.75 | |||
| 24 | 2.5E+05 | 19 | 7 | 26.94 | 0.52 | 54.92 | 82.38 | ||||
| 49 | 3.0E+04 | 32 | 6 | 29.34 | 14.97 | 44.31 |
Values less than 0.01 % or not detected are not shown
OTU operational taxonomic units, NA data not available
a% of LAB is calculated as the sum at Lactobacillales order level
Fig. 1Average percentages of total LAB and different LAB genera at different fermentation stages. Early (empty bar), mid (striped bar), and late (filled bar) fermentation samples are presented. Values were calculated using only samples in which those populations were present
Predominant bacterial species of nine different commercial ethanol plants
| Plant | Fermentation stage (hours) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | 0.3 | 9.5 | 6.1 | |||||
| 24 | 0.8 | 1.2 |
|
| |||||
| 52 |
|
| |||||||
| 2 | 25 | 4.7 | 0.4 |
| |||||
| 34 | 3.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| |||||
| 43 | 11.8 | 0.4 |
| ||||||
| 3 | 15 | 2.3 | 0.4 | 0.7 |
| 16.3 | |||
| 30 |
| 13.7 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| ||||
| 45 | 11.9 | 1.8 |
| ||||||
| 4 | 9 | 11.3 | 5.3 | 9.6 | 0.9 |
| |||
| 27 |
| 0.9 | 15.1 | 0.9 | 14.6 | ||||
| 45 |
| 3.2 | 18.8 | 5.8 | |||||
| 5 | 18 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| 0.4 | |||
| 32 | 4.1 | 1.4 |
| 14.1 | 0.5 | ||||
| 45 | 4.9 |
| 0.9 | ||||||
| 6 | 8 | 2.3 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 4.9 | 1.5 | |||
| 26 | 4.9 | 0.7 | 0.6 |
| 15.8 | 0.2 | |||
| 34 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 9.9 | 1.4 | |||||
| 7 | 15 | 4.7 | 0.7 | 2.3 |
| 2.3 | |||
| 34 | 0.2 |
| 3.5 | 0.7 | 3.4 | ||||
| 42 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 15.7 | 0.2 |
| ||||
| 8 | 17 | 1.2 | 0.3 | ||||||
| 35 | 8.9 |
| 11.3 | ||||||
| 54 |
|
| 6.3 | ||||||
| 9 | 6 | 1.4 | 8.5 | 0.3 |
| ||||
| 24 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 9.3 |
| 0.3 | ||||
| 49 | 0.5 | 15.5 | 0.2 | 13.5 |
Predominant species are defined as those present at ≥20 % of total bacterial population (italic numbers) in any sample. Values not detected or less than 0.1 % are not shown
Pair-wise comparison of LAB and non-LAB shared species among early, mid, and late fermentation samples of nine plants
Sørensen–Dice index values were presented and color-coded: gray (no species in common), white (up to 0.4), green (greater than 0.4), yellow (all species shared between the two samples). Values above the yellow diagonal are comparisons of non-LAB, values below yellow diagonal are comparisons of LAB
Non-LAB genera in commercial ethanol plants
| Metabolic trait | OTU | Samples | Example genera |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sulfidogen, all | 22 | 15 |
|
| Sulfate reducing bacteria | 12 | 8 |
|
| Other sulfidogens | 10 | 12 |
|
| Iron reducing bacteria | 7 | 10 |
|
| Acid producing bacteria, alla | 59 | 27 |
|
| Acetogen | 3 | 7 |
|
OTU operational taxonomic units
aAcid producing bacteria include lactic acid bacteria
Activities of EcoSau and EcoInf against L. fermentum and L. mucosae isolates
| Strains tested | Plants represented | Susceptible to EcoSaua | Susceptible to EcoInfa | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strains | Plants | Strains | Plants | |||
|
| 12 | 8 | 10 | 6 | 12 | 8 |
|
| 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
aSusceptibility assayed by spotting 10 µl of a routine test dilution of phage (~105 pfu/ml)
Fig. 2Transmission electron micrographs of phages EcoInf (a) and EcoSau (b). Bars 100 nm
Summary of the characteristics of phages EcoSau and EcoInf
| Phage | Morphology | Phage group | Head diam (nm) | Tail length (nm) | Tail width (nm) | Genome length (bp) | GC (%) | Genomic termini | No. of CDS | tRNA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EcoSau |
| P335-like | 62 ± 2 | 179 ± 6 | 11 ± 1 | 31,703 | 48.4 |
| 50 | No |
| EcoInf |
| A novel typea | 89 ± 3 | 202 ± 4 | 20 ± 1 | 106,071 | 38.2 | Direct terminal repeat (817 bp) | 124 | Yes (2) |
aVery distantly related to SPO1-like phages
Fig. 3Genome maps of EcoSau and EcoInf. Predicted genes are represented by boxes above and below the heavy black line; boxes above the lines are genes encoded on the forward strand, and those below the lines are on the reverse strand. The ruler below the genomes indicates the scale (in kb). Genome features (novel or conserved proteins of unknown function, proteins with functional assignment, tRNA genes, terminal repeat) are color coded according to the legend. Lines above the map show the extent of the suggested functional modules. a Comparison map of EcoSau to L. johnsonni FI9785 prophage LAJO. The LAJO prophage encompasses the region encoding locus tags FI9785_801 to FI9785_849 (accession no. NC_013504). Putative attL and attR sites on the prophage genomic termini are indicated. Genomic map of EcoSau was opened between gp 27 and gp 28 for easy comparison and alignment with the rest two genomes. Proteins sharing identities (e value <10−5) were linked with black lines. b Genome map of EcoInf
Fig. 4Effect of phages EcoSau and EcoInf in ethanol fermentation models contaminated with L. fermentum at 107 cfu/ml starting level. Fermentation groups were set up in triplicate, including infection-free control (no bacteria challenge), infection control (bacteria challenged without treatment), and EcoSau, EcoInf, or EcoSau + EcoInf treatment (bacteria challenged and with phage treatment at MOI of 10). At the end of the fermentation, levels of a ethanol b glucose c lactic acid, and d acetic acid, were determined and compared. Levels of recoverable phage (e) were determined during fermentation in phage-treated systems