Literature DB >> 17726620

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Lactobacillus species isolated from commercial ethanol plants.

Kenneth M Bischoff1, Kelly A Skinner-Nemec, Timothy D Leathers.   

Abstract

Bacterial contamination of commercial fermentation cultures is a common and costly problem to the fuel ethanol industry. Antimicrobials such as virginiamycin (VIR) and penicillin (PEN) are frequently used to control contamination but there are little data available on the susceptibility of bacterial contaminants to these agents. A survey of bacterial contaminants from a wet-mill ethanol plant with no history of using antibiotics and a dry-grind facility that periodically doses with VIR found that the majority of contaminants were species of Lactobacillus. Thirty-seven isolates of Lactobacillus species from the wet-mill and 42 isolates from the dry-grind facility were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility using broth dilution and agar dilution methods. In general, the Lactobacillus isolates from the dry-grind plant had higher minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for the tested agents than the isolates from the wet-mill facility. The MIC(90) for VIR was 4 microg/ml for the dry-grind isolates versus 0.25 microg/ml for the wet-mill isolates; and for PEN, the MIC(90)'s were >8 and 2 microg/ml for the dry-grind and wet-mill isolates, respectively. Sixteen Lactobacillus isolates from the dry-grind plant but none from the wet-mill possessed vatE, a gene that encodes a streptogramin acetyltransferase associated with resistance to virginiamycin. Despite decreased susceptibility to virginiamycin, most dry-grind isolates had MICs lower than the maximal recommended application rate of 6 ppm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17726620     DOI: 10.1007/s10295-007-0250-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1367-5435            Impact factor:   3.346


  21 in total

1.  Characterization of a new enterococcal gene, satG, encoding a putative acetyltransferase conferring resistance to Streptogramin A compounds.

Authors:  G Werner; W Witte
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Microbial acetylation of M factor of virginiamycin.

Authors:  C De Meester; J Rondelet
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Mechanisms of resistance to quinupristin-dalfopristin among isolates of Enterococcus faecium from animals, raw meat, and hospital patients in Western Europe.

Authors:  M Soltani; D Beighton; J Philpott-Howard; N Woodford
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Comparison of API 50 CH strips to whole-chromosomal DNA probes for identification of Lactobacillus species.

Authors:  Melinda A Boyd; May A D Antonio; Sharon L Hillier
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of lactic acid bacteria isolated from a cheese environment.

Authors:  Ana Belén Flórez; Susana Delgado; Baltasar Mayo
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Urea hydrogen peroxide reduces the numbers of lactobacilli, nourishes yeast, and leaves no residues in the ethanol fermentation.

Authors:  N V Narendranath; K C Thomas; W M Ingledew
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Sequence and genetic organization of the 19.3-kb erythromycin- and dalfopristin-resistance plasmid pLME300 from Lactobacillus fermentum ROT1.

Authors:  Karin Y Gfeller; Monika Roth; Leo Meile; Michael Teuber
Journal:  Plasmid       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  Bacterial contaminants of fuel ethanol production.

Authors:  Kelly A Skinner; Timothy D Leathers
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-08-28       Impact factor: 3.346

9.  Control of Lactobacillus contaminants in continuous fuel ethanol fermentations by constant or pulsed addition of penicillin G.

Authors:  D P Bayrock; K C Thomas; W M Ingledew
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Identification of the satA gene encoding a streptogramin A acetyltransferase in Enterococcus faecium BM4145.

Authors:  R Rende-Fournier; R Leclercq; M Galimand; J Duval; P Courvalin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  15 in total

1.  Characterization of microbial communities in ethanol biorefineries.

Authors:  Fernanda C Firmino; Davide Porcellato; Madison Cox; Garret Suen; Jeffery R Broadbent; James L Steele
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Bacillus spp. produce antibacterial activities against lactic acid bacteria that contaminate fuel ethanol plants.

Authors:  Pennapa Manitchotpisit; Kenneth M Bischoff; Neil P J Price; Timothy D Leathers
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Antibacterial activity of a cell wall hydrolase from Lactobacillus paracasei NRRL B-50314 produced by recombinant Bacillus megaterium.

Authors:  Siqing Liu; Joseph O Rich; Amber Anderson
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Combination of natural antimicrobials for contamination control in ethanol production.

Authors:  Natalia Janaina Lago Maia; Jessica Audrey Feijó Corrêa; Rachel Tereza Rigotti; Anisio Antonio da Silva Junior; Fernando Bittencourt Luciano
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Bacterial Community Structure and Dynamics During Corn-Based Bioethanol Fermentation.

Authors:  Qing Li; E Patrick Heist; Luke A Moe
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Selective suppression of bacterial contaminants by process conditions during lignocellulose based yeast fermentations.

Authors:  Eva Albers; Emma Johansson; Carl Johan Franzén; Christer Larsson
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 6.040

7.  Bacteriophage-encoded lytic enzymes control growth of contaminating Lactobacillus found in fuel ethanol fermentations.

Authors:  Dwayne R Roach; Piyum A Khatibi; Kenneth M Bischoff; Stephen R Hughes; David M Donovan
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 6.040

8.  Bacteriophage application restores ethanol fermentation characteristics disrupted by Lactobacillus fermentum.

Authors:  Mei Liu; Kenneth M Bischoff; Jason J Gill; Miranda D Mire-Criscione; Joel D Berry; Ry Young; Elizabeth J Summer
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 6.040

9.  Bacteriophages as antimicrobial agents against bacterial contaminants in yeast fermentation processes.

Authors:  Juliano Bertozzi Silva; Dominic Sauvageau
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 6.040

10.  A multiple antibiotic-resistant enterobacter cloacae strain isolated from a bioethanol fermentation facility.

Authors:  Colin A Murphree; Qing Li; E Patrick Heist; Luke A Moe
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.