Literature DB >> 19148876

Modeling bacterial contamination of fuel ethanol fermentation.

Kenneth M Bischoff1, Siqing Liu, Timothy D Leathers, Ronald E Worthington, Joseph O Rich.   

Abstract

The emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria may limit the effectiveness of antibiotics to treat bacterial contamination in fuel ethanol plants, and therefore, new antibacterial intervention methods and tools to test their application are needed. Using shake-flask cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown on saccharified corn mash and strains of lactic acid bacteria isolated from a dry-grind ethanol facility, a simple model to simulate bacterial contamination and infection was developed. Challenging the model with 10(8) CFU/mL Lactobacillus fermentum decreased ethanol yield by 27% and increased residual glucose from 6.2 to 45.5 g/L. The magnitude of the effect was proportional to the initial bacterial load, with 10(5) CFU/mL L. fermentum still producing an 8% decrease in ethanol and a 3.2-fold increase in residual glucose. Infection was also dependent on the bacterial species used to challenge the fermentation, as neither L. delbrueckii ATCC 4797 nor L. amylovorus 0315-7B produced a significant decrease in ethanol when inoculated at a density of 10(8) CFU/mL. In the shake-flask model, treatment with 2 microg/mL virginiamycin mitigated the infection when challenged with a susceptible strain of L. fermentum (MIC for virginiamycin < or =2 ppm), but treatment was ineffective at treating infection by a resistant strain of L. fermentum (MIC = 16 ppm). The model may find application in developing new antibacterial agents and management practices for use in controlling contamination in the fuel ethanol industry. Copyright 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19148876     DOI: 10.1002/bit.22244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  17 in total

1.  Microbial diversity in sugarcane ethanol production in a Brazilian distillery using a culture-independent method.

Authors:  Ohana Yonara Assis Costa; Betulia Morais Souto; Daiva Domenech Tupinambá; Jessica Carvalho Bergmann; Cynthia Maria Kyaw; Ricardo Henrique Kruger; Cristine Chaves Barreto; Betania Ferraz Quirino
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Characterization of microbial communities in ethanol biorefineries.

Authors:  Fernanda C Firmino; Davide Porcellato; Madison Cox; Garret Suen; Jeffery R Broadbent; James L Steele
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Bacillus spp. produce antibacterial activities against lactic acid bacteria that contaminate fuel ethanol plants.

Authors:  Pennapa Manitchotpisit; Kenneth M Bischoff; Neil P J Price; Timothy D Leathers
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Influence of cultivation procedure for Saccharomyces cerevisiae used as pitching agent in industrial spent sulphite liquor fermentations.

Authors:  Emma Johansson; Tomas Brandberg; Christer Larsson
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Metabolic responses to Lactobacillus plantarum contamination or bacteriophage treatment in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a GC-MS-based metabolomics approach.

Authors:  Feng-Xia Cui; Rui-Min Zhang; Hua-Qing Liu; Yan-Feng Wang; Hao Li
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Bacterial Community Structure and Dynamics During Corn-Based Bioethanol Fermentation.

Authors:  Qing Li; E Patrick Heist; Luke A Moe
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 7.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for second-generation ethanol production: from academic exploration to industrial implementation.

Authors:  Mickel L A Jansen; Jasmine M Bracher; Ioannis Papapetridis; Maarten D Verhoeven; Hans de Bruijn; Paul P de Waal; Antonius J A van Maris; Paul Klaassen; Jack T Pronk
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Contamination issues in a continuous ethanol production corn wet milling facility.

Authors:  Esha Khullar; Angela D Kent; Timothy D Leathers; Kenneth M Bischoff; Kent D Rausch; M E Tumbleson; Vijay Singh
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-12-25       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Bacteriophage-encoded lytic enzymes control growth of contaminating Lactobacillus found in fuel ethanol fermentations.

Authors:  Dwayne R Roach; Piyum A Khatibi; Kenneth M Bischoff; Stephen R Hughes; David M Donovan
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 6.040

10.  Bacteriophage application restores ethanol fermentation characteristics disrupted by Lactobacillus fermentum.

Authors:  Mei Liu; Kenneth M Bischoff; Jason J Gill; Miranda D Mire-Criscione; Joel D Berry; Ry Young; Elizabeth J Summer
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 6.040

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.