Literature DB >> 26338323

A Computational Model of Implicit Memory Captures Dyslexics' Perceptual Deficits.

Sagi Jaffe-Dax1, Ofri Raviv1, Nori Jacoby1, Yonatan Loewenstein2, Merav Ahissar3.   

Abstract

Dyslexics are diagnosed for their poor reading skills, yet they characteristically also suffer from poor verbal memory and often from poor auditory skills. To date, this combined profile has been accounted for in broad cognitive terms. Here we hypothesize that the perceptual deficits associated with dyslexia can be understood computationally as a deficit in integrating prior information with noisy observations. To test this hypothesis we analyzed the performance of human participants in an auditory discrimination task using a two-parameter computational model. One parameter captures the internal noise in representing the current event, and the other captures the impact of recently acquired prior information. Our findings show that dyslexics' perceptual deficit can be accounted for by inadequate adjustment of these components; namely, low weighting of their implicit memory of past trials relative to their internal noise. Underweighting the stimulus statistics decreased dyslexics' ability to compensate for noisy observations. ERP measurements (P2 component) while participants watched a silent movie indicated that dyslexics' perceptual deficiency may stem from poor automatic integration of stimulus statistics. This study provides the first description of a specific computational deficit associated with dyslexia. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study presents the first attempt to specify the mechanisms underlying dyslexics' perceptual difficulties computationally by applying a specific model, inspired by the Bayesian framework. This model dissociates between the contribution of sensory noise and that of the prior statistics in an auditory perceptual decision task. We show that dyslexics cannot compensate for their perceptual noise by incorporating prior information. By contrast, adequately reading controls' usage of previous information is often close to optimal. We used ERP measurements to assess the neuronal stage of this deficit. We found that unlike their peers, dyslexics' ERP responses are not sensitive to the relations between the current observation and the prior observation, indicating that they cannot establish a reliable prior.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/3512116-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anchoring deficit; computational neuroscience; event-related potentials; perception; predictive coding; statistical learning

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26338323      PMCID: PMC6605302          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1302-15.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  71 in total

1.  Central auditory plasticity: changes in the N1-P2 complex after speech-sound training.

Authors:  K Tremblay; N Kraus; T McGee; C Ponton; B Otis
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Impaired auditory frequency discrimination in dyslexia detected with mismatch evoked potentials.

Authors:  T Baldeweg; A Richardson; S Watkins; C Foale; J Gruzelier
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 10.422

3.  Cortical auditory signal processing in poor readers.

Authors:  S Nagarajan; H Mahncke; T Salz; P Tallal; T Roberts; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-05-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Flutter discrimination: neural codes, perception, memory and decision making.

Authors:  Ranulfo Romo; Emilio Salinas
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Neuronal correlates of decision-making in secondary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Ranulfo Romo; Adrián Hernández; Antonio Zainos; Luis Lemus; Carlos D Brody
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Disabled readers suffer from visual and auditory impairments but not from a specific magnocellular deficit.

Authors:  Sygal Amitay; Gal Ben-Yehudah; Karen Banai; Merav Ahissar
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Dyslexia: cultural diversity and biological unity.

Authors:  E Paulesu; J F Démonet; F Fazio; E McCrory; V Chanoine; N Brunswick; S F Cappa; G Cossu; M Habib; C D Frith; U Frith
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-16       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Implicit learning deficit in children with developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Stefano Vicari; Luigi Marotta; Deny Menghini; Marco Molinari; Laura Petrosini
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Theories of developmental dyslexia: insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults.

Authors:  Franck Ramus; Stuart Rosen; Steven C Dakin; Brian L Day; Juan M Castellote; Sarah White; Uta Frith
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Disruption of posterior brain systems for reading in children with developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Bennett A Shaywitz; Sally E Shaywitz; Kenneth R Pugh; W Einar Mencl; Robert K Fulbright; Pawel Skudlarski; R Todd Constable; Karen E Marchione; Jack M Fletcher; G Reid Lyon; John C Gore
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 13.382

View more
  15 in total

1.  Dysfunction of Rapid Neural Adaptation in Dyslexia.

Authors:  Tyler K Perrachione; Stephanie N Del Tufo; Rebecca Winter; Jack Murtagh; Abigail Cyr; Patricia Chang; Kelly Halverson; Satrajit S Ghosh; Joanna A Christodoulou; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Neurophysiological mechanisms of cortical plasticity impairments in schizophrenia and modulation by the NMDA receptor agonist D-serine.

Authors:  Joshua T Kantrowitz; Michael L Epstein; Odeta Beggel; Stephanie Rohrig; Jonathan M Lehrfeld; Nadine Revheim; Nayla P Lehrfeld; Jacob Reep; Emily Parker; Gail Silipo; Merav Ahissar; Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Electrophysiological correlates of perceptual prediction error are attenuated in dyslexia.

Authors:  Sara D Beach; Sung-Joo Lim; Carlos Cardenas-Iniguez; Marianna D Eddy; John D E Gabrieli; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Atypical processing of tones and phonemes in Rett Syndrome as biomarkers of disease progression.

Authors:  Olga V Sysoeva; Sophie Molholm; Aleksandra Djukic; Hans-Peter Frey; John J Foxe
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  Dyslexics' faster decay of implicit memory for sounds and words is manifested in their shorter neural adaptation.

Authors:  Sagi Jaffe-Dax; Or Frenkel; Merav Ahissar
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Perceptual Plasticity for Auditory Object Recognition.

Authors:  Shannon L M Heald; Stephen C Van Hedger; Howard C Nusbaum
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-23

7.  Short-term adaptation to sound statistics is unimpaired in developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Yafit Gabay; Lori L Holt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Beyond production: Brain responses during speech perception in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Tali Halag-Milo; Nadav Stoppelman; Vered Kronfeld-Duenias; Oren Civier; Ofer Amir; Ruth Ezrati-Vinacour; Michal Ben-Shachar
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 4.881

9.  Shorter cortical adaptation in dyslexia is broadly distributed in the superior temporal lobe and includes the primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Sagi Jaffe-Dax; Eva Kimel; Merav Ahissar
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Short-term memory capacity and sensitivity to language statistics in dyslexia and among musicians.

Authors:  Eva Kimel; Atalia Hai Weiss; Hilla Jakoby; Luba Daikhin; Merav Ahissar
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.