Literature DB >> 12615643

Theories of developmental dyslexia: insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults.

Franck Ramus1, Stuart Rosen, Steven C Dakin, Brian L Day, Juan M Castellote, Sarah White, Uta Frith.   

Abstract

A multiple case study was conducted in order to assess three leading theories of developmental dyslexia: (i) the phonological theory, (ii) the magnocellular (auditory and visual) theory and (iii) the cerebellar theory. Sixteen dyslexic and 16 control university students were administered a full battery of psychometric, phonological, auditory, visual and cerebellar tests. Individual data reveal that all 16 dyslexics suffer from a phonological deficit, 10 from an auditory deficit, four from a motor deficit and two from a visual magnocellular deficit. Results suggest that a phonological deficit can appear in the absence of any other sensory or motor disorder, and is sufficient to cause a literacy impairment, as demonstrated by five of the dyslexics. Auditory disorders, when present, aggravate the phonological deficit, hence the literacy impairment. However, auditory deficits cannot be characterized simply as rapid auditory processing problems, as would be predicted by the magnocellular theory. Nor are they restricted to speech. Contrary to the cerebellar theory, we find little support for the notion that motor impairments, when found, have a cerebellar origin or reflect an automaticity deficit. Overall, the present data support the phonological theory of dyslexia, while acknowledging the presence of additional sensory and motor disorders in certain individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12615643     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awg076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  198 in total

1.  Auditory perceptual learning.

Authors:  David R Moore; Sygal Amitay; David J C Hawkey
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Differential activation of the visual word form area during auditory phoneme perception in youth with dyslexia.

Authors:  Lisa L Conant; Einat Liebenthal; Anjali Desai; Mark S Seidenberg; Jeffrey R Binder
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Investigating speech perception in children with dyslexia: is there evidence of a consistent deficit in individuals?

Authors:  Souhila Messaoud-Galusi; Valerie Hazan; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Implicit learning in children with spelling disability: evidence from artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  Elena Ise; Carolin J Arnoldi; Jürgen Bartling; Gerd Schulte-Körne
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Decreased sensitivity to phonemic mismatch in spoken word processing in adult developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Esther Janse; Elise de Bree; Susanne Brouwer
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2010-12

Review 6.  Connectionist neuropsychology: uncovering ultimate causes of acquired dyslexia.

Authors:  Anna M Woollams
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  When all hypotheses are right: a multifocal account of dyslexia.

Authors:  Cyril Pernet; Jesper Andersson; Eraldo Paulesu; Jean Francois Demonet
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Speech Recognition in Noise by Children with and without Dyslexia: How is it Related to Reading?

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Letitia M Krieg; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2018-05-01

9.  Two forms of implicit learning in young adults with dyslexia.

Authors:  Ilana J Bennett; Jennifer C Romano; James H Howard; Darlene V Howard
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Stable auditory processing underlies phonological awareness in typically developing preschoolers.

Authors:  Silvia Bonacina; Sebastian Otto-Meyer; Jennifer Krizman; Travis White-Schwoch; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.