Literature DB >> 34801517

Electrophysiological correlates of perceptual prediction error are attenuated in dyslexia.

Sara D Beach1, Sung-Joo Lim2, Carlos Cardenas-Iniguez3, Marianna D Eddy4, John D E Gabrieli5, Tyler K Perrachione6.   

Abstract

A perceptual adaptation deficit often accompanies reading difficulty in dyslexia, manifesting in poor perceptual learning of consistent stimuli and reduced neurophysiological adaptation to stimulus repetition. However, it is not known how adaptation deficits relate to differences in feedforward or feedback processes in the brain. Here we used electroencephalography (EEG) to interrogate the feedforward and feedback contributions to neural adaptation as adults with and without dyslexia viewed pairs of faces and words in a paradigm that manipulated whether there was a high probability of stimulus repetition versus a high probability of stimulus change. We measured three neural dependent variables: expectation (the difference between prestimulus EEG power with and without the expectation of stimulus repetition), feedforward repetition (the difference between event-related potentials (ERPs) evoked by an expected change and an unexpected repetition), and feedback-mediated prediction error (the difference between ERPs evoked by an unexpected change and an expected repetition). Expectation significantly modulated prestimulus theta- and alpha-band EEG in both groups. Unexpected repetitions of words, but not faces, also led to significant feedforward repetition effects in the ERPs of both groups. However, neural prediction error when an unexpected change occurred instead of an expected repetition was significantly weaker in dyslexia than the control group for both faces and words. These results suggest that the neural and perceptual adaptation deficits observed in dyslexia reflect the failure to effectively integrate perceptual predictions with feedforward sensory processing. In addition to reducing perceptual efficiency, the attenuation of neural prediction error signals would also be deleterious to the wide range of perceptual and procedural learning abilities that are critical for developing accurate and fluent reading skills.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptation; Dyslexia; Event-related potentials; Expectation; Prediction error; Repetition; Time-frequency

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34801517      PMCID: PMC8807066          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  135 in total

1.  Impaired auditory frequency discrimination in dyslexia detected with mismatch evoked potentials.

Authors:  T Baldeweg; A Richardson; S Watkins; C Foale; J Gruzelier
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 10.422

2.  fMRI repetition suppression: neuronal adaptation or stimulus expectation?

Authors:  Jonas Larsson; Andrew T Smith
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Anatomical properties of the arcuate fasciculus predict phonological and reading skills in children.

Authors:  Jason D Yeatman; Robert F Dougherty; Elena Rykhlevskaia; Anthony J Sherbondy; Gayle K Deutsch; Brian A Wandell; Michal Ben-Shachar
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Dysfunction of Rapid Neural Adaptation in Dyslexia.

Authors:  Tyler K Perrachione; Stephanie N Del Tufo; Rebecca Winter; Jack Murtagh; Abigail Cyr; Patricia Chang; Kelly Halverson; Satrajit S Ghosh; Joanna A Christodoulou; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Deficits in perceptual noise exclusion in developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Anne J Sperling; Zhong-Lin Lu; Franklin R Manis; Mark S Seidenberg
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Speech-specific perceptual adaptation deficits in children and adults with dyslexia.

Authors:  Ola Ozernov-Palchik; Sara D Beach; Meredith Brown; Tracy M Centanni; Nadine Gaab; Gina Kuperberg; Tyler K Perrachione; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2021-11-29

7.  Incidental learning of sound categories is impaired in developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Yafit Gabay; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 8.  Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom.

Authors:  Trinity B Crapse; Marc A Sommer
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Tracking the roots of reading ability: white matter volume and integrity correlate with phonological awareness in prereading and early-reading kindergarten children.

Authors:  Zeynep M Saygin; Elizabeth S Norton; David E Osher; Sara D Beach; Abigail B Cyr; Ola Ozernov-Palchik; Anastasia Yendiki; Bruce Fischl; Nadine Gaab; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Shorter cortical adaptation in dyslexia is broadly distributed in the superior temporal lobe and includes the primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Sagi Jaffe-Dax; Eva Kimel; Merav Ahissar
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Neural Representation of a Repeated Standard Stimulus in Dyslexia.

Authors:  Sara D Beach; Ola Ozernov-Palchik; Sidney C May; Tracy M Centanni; Tyler K Perrachione; Dimitrios Pantazis; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.473

2.  Is there evidence for a noisy computation deficit in developmental dyslexia?

Authors:  Yufei Tan; Valérie Chanoine; Eddy Cavalli; Jean-Luc Anton; Johannes C Ziegler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.473

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.