Literature DB >> 11324846

Central auditory plasticity: changes in the N1-P2 complex after speech-sound training.

K Tremblay1, N Kraus, T McGee, C Ponton, B Otis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the N1-P2 complex reflects training-induced changes in neural activity associated with improved voice-onset-time (VOT) perception.
DESIGN: Auditory cortical evoked potentials N1 and P2 were obtained from 10 normal-hearing young adults in response to two synthetic speech variants of the syllable /ba/. Using a repeated measures design, subjects were tested before and after training both behaviorally and neurophysiologically to determine whether there were training-related changes. In between pre- and post-testing sessions, subjects were trained to distinguish the -20 and -10 msec VOT /ba/ syllables as being different from each other. Two stimulus presentation rates were used during electrophysiologic testing (390 msec and 910 msec interstimulus interval).
RESULTS: Before training, subjects perceived both the -20 msec and -10 msec VOT stimuli as /ba/. Through training, subjects learned to identify the -20 msec VOT stimulus as "mba" and -10 msec VOT stimulus as "ba." As subjects learned to correctly identify the difference between the -20 msec and -10 msec VOT syllabi, an increase in N1-P2 peak-to-peak amplitude was observed. The effects of training were most obvious at the slower stimulus presentation rate.
CONCLUSIONS: As perception improved, N1-P2 amplitude increased. These changes in waveform morphology are thought to reflect increases in neural synchrony as well as strengthened neural connections associated with improved speech perception. These findings suggest that the N1-P2 complex may have clinical applications as an objective physiologic correlate of speech-sound representation associated with speech-sound training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11324846     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200104000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  103 in total

1.  The time course of neural changes underlying auditory perceptual learning.

Authors:  Mercedes Atienza; Jose L Cantero; Elena Dominguez-Marin
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Learning impaired children exhibit timing deficits and training-related improvements in auditory cortical responses to speech in noise.

Authors:  Catherine M Warrier; Krista L Johnson; Erin A Hayes; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Reorganization in processing of spectral and temporal input in the rat posterior auditory field induced by environmental enrichment.

Authors:  Vikram Jakkamsetti; Kevin Q Chang; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  [Auditory processing and perception disorders: proposed treatment and management: guidelines of the German Society for Phoniatry and Pedaudiology].

Authors:  R Schönweiler; A Nickisch; A am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  [Auditory processing disorders : Consensus statement by the German Society for Phoniatry and Paedaudiology].

Authors:  A Nickisch; M Gross; R Schönweiler; V Uttenweiler; A am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen; R Berger; H J Radü; M Ptok
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Sensitivity of EEG and MEG to the N1 and P2 auditory evoked responses modulated by spectral complexity of sounds.

Authors:  Antoine J Shahin; Larry E Roberts; Lee M Miller; Kelly L McDonald; Claude Alain
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Event-related potentials reflect spectral differences in speech and non-speech stimuli in children and adults.

Authors:  R Ceponiene; M Torki; P Alku; A Koyama; J Townsend
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Restoration of sensory input may improve cognitive and neural function.

Authors:  Hanin Karawani; Kimberly Jenkins; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Electrophysiological Evidence of Early Cortical Sensitivity to Human Conspecific Mimic Voice as a Distinct Category of Natural Sound.

Authors:  William J Talkington; Jeremy Donai; Alexandra S Kadner; Molly L Layne; Andrew Forino; Sijin Wen; Si Gao; Margeaux M Gray; Alexandria J Ashraf; Gabriela N Valencia; Brandon D Smith; Stephanie K Khoo; Stephen J Gray; Norman Lass; Julie A Brefczynski-Lewis; Susannah Engdahl; David Graham; Chris A Frum; James W Lewis
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Cortical and subcortical processing of short duration speech stimuli in trained rock musicians: a pilot study.

Authors:  Prawin Kumar; Sam Publius Anil; Vibhu Grover; Himanshu Kumar Sanju; Sachchidanand Sinha
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.