Literature DB >> 26331725

Ecosystem services as assessment endpoints for ecological risk assessment.

Wayne R Munns1, Anne W Rea2, Glenn W Suter3, Lawrence Martin4, Lynne Blake-Hedges5, Tanja Crk6, Christine Davis7, Gina Ferreira8, Steve Jordan9, Michele Mahoney10, Mace G Barron9.   

Abstract

Ecosystem services are defined as the outputs of ecological processes that contribute to human welfare or have the potential to do so in the future. Those outputs include food and drinking water, clean air and water, and pollinated crops. The need to protect the services provided by natural systems has been recognized previously, but ecosystem services have not been formally incorporated into ecological risk assessment practice in a general way in the United States. Endpoints used conventionally in ecological risk assessment, derived directly from the state of the ecosystem (e.g., biophysical structure and processes), and endpoints based on ecosystem services serve different purposes. Conventional endpoints are ecologically important and susceptible entities and attributes that are protected under US laws and regulations. Ecosystem service endpoints are a conceptual and analytical step beyond conventional endpoints and are intended to complement conventional endpoints by linking and extending endpoints to goods and services with more obvious benefit to humans. Conventional endpoints can be related to ecosystem services even when the latter are not considered explicitly during problem formulation. To advance the use of ecosystem service endpoints in ecological risk assessment, the US Environmental Protection Agency's Risk Assessment Forum has added generic endpoints based on ecosystem services (ES-GEAE) to the original 2003 set of generic ecological assessment endpoints (GEAEs). Like conventional GEAEs, ES-GEAEs are defined by an entity and an attribute. Also like conventional GEAEs, ES-GEAEs are broadly described and will need to be made specific when applied to individual assessments. Adoption of ecosystem services as a type of assessment endpoint is intended to improve the value of risk assessment to environmental decision making, linking ecological risk to human well-being, and providing an improved means of communicating those risks. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2016;12:522-528. Published 2015 SETAC. This article is a US Government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the USA. Published 2015 SETAC. This article is a US Government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment endpoints; Ecological risk assessment; Ecosystem services; Generic ecological assessment endpoints

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26331725     DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag        ISSN: 1551-3777            Impact factor:   2.992


  11 in total

1.  A unified approach for protecting listed species and ecosystem services in isolated wetlands using community-level protection goals.

Authors:  Sandy Raimondo; Leah Sharpe; Leah Oliver; Kelly R McCaffrey; S Thomas Purucker; Sumathy Sinnathamby; Jeffrey M Minucci
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 2.  A framework for predicting impacts on ecosystem services from (sub)organismal responses to chemicals.

Authors:  Valery E Forbes; Chris J Salice; Bjorn Birnir; Randy J F Bruins; Peter Calow; Virginie Ducrot; Nika Galic; Kristina Garber; Bret C Harvey; Henriette Jager; Andrew Kanarek; Robert Pastorok; Steve F Railsback; Richard Rebarber; Pernille Thorbek
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Toward the improvement of total nitrogen deposition budgets in the United States.

Authors:  J T Walker; G Beachley; H M Amos; J S Baron; J Bash; R Baumgardner; M D Bell; K B Benedict; X Chen; D W Clow; A Cole; J G Coughlin; K Cruz; R W Daly; S M Decina; E M Elliott; M E Fenn; L Ganzeveld; K Gebhart; S S Isil; B M Kerschner; R S Larson; T Lavery; G G Lear; T Macy; M A Mast; K Mishoe; K H Morris; P E Padgett; R V Pouyat; M Puchalski; H O T Pye; A W Rea; M F Rhodes; C M Rogers; R Saylor; R Scheffe; B A Schichtel; D B Schwede; G A Sexstone; B C Sive; R Sosa Echeverría; P H Templer; T Thompson; D Tong; G A Wetherbee; T H Whitlow; Z Wu; Z Yu; L Zhang
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Downscaling a Human Well-Being Index for Environmental Management and Environmental Justice Applications in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Susan H Yee; Elizabeth Paulukonis; Kyle D Buck
Journal:  Appl Geogr       Date:  2020-07-08

Review 5.  The potential of genomics for restoring ecosystems and biodiversity.

Authors:  Martin F Breed; Peter A Harrison; Colette Blyth; Margaret Byrne; Virginie Gaget; Nicholas J C Gellie; Scott V C Groom; Riley Hodgson; Jacob G Mills; Thomas A A Prowse; Dorothy A Steane; Jakki J Mohr
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Ecosystem services consideration in the remediation process for contaminated sites.

Authors:  Matthew C Harwell; Chloe Jackson; Michael Kravitz; Kira Lynch; Jewel Tomasula; Anne Neale; Michele Mahoney; Carlos Pachon; Karen Scheuermann; Gregory Grissom; Kristen Parry
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 6.789

7.  Evolving Science and Practice of Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Katherine von Stackelberg; Pamela R D Williams
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 8.  An Overview of Literature Topics Related to Current Concepts, Methods, Tools, and Applications for Cumulative Risk Assessment (2007-2016).

Authors:  Mary A Fox; L Elizabeth Brewer; Lawrence Martin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Synthesis of Two Decades of US EPA's Ecosystem Services Research to Inform Environmental, Community, and Sustainability Decision Making.

Authors:  Matthew C Harwell; Chloe A Jackson
Journal:  Sustainability       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 3.889

10.  Ecological determinants of health: food and environment on human health.

Authors:  Alice M L Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.