Literature DB >> 33588170

Ecosystem services consideration in the remediation process for contaminated sites.

Matthew C Harwell1, Chloe Jackson2, Michael Kravitz3, Kira Lynch4, Jewel Tomasula5, Anne Neale6, Michele Mahoney7, Carlos Pachon7, Karen Scheuermann8, Gregory Grissom9, Kristen Parry10.   

Abstract

In 2009, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Science Advisory Board recommended activities to advance consideration of ecosystem services (ES) to enhance existing remediation and redevelopment processes in the U.S. This article examines advancements in the decade since, focusing on providing those involved in cleanup of contaminated sites a basic understanding of ES concepts and guidelines for considering ES at cleanup sites using a new, four-step transferable framework. Descriptions, including activities for site teams and case study applications of ES tools, are presented for each step: (1) identify site-specific ES; (2) quantify relevant ES; (3) examine how cleanup activities affect ES; and (4) identify, select, and implement solutions (e.g., Best Management Practices). The goal of this article is to provide site cleanup stakeholders, including project managers, contractors, and site responsible parties, with a stronger foundation and shared understanding to consider ES during the cleanup process for their given site. Anticipated outcomes include identifying ES benefits to inform management and tradeoff analyses, a reduction in unintended impacts on ES during site operations, and attention to developing a robust suite of ES relevant for site reuse. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contaminated site; Ecosystem services; EnviroAtlas; Environmental benefits; Remediation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33588170      PMCID: PMC8715514          DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  8 in total

1.  The rationale for simple approaches for sustainability assessment and management in contaminated land practice.

Authors:  R Paul Bardos; Brian D Bone; Richard Boyle; Frank Evans; Nicola D Harries; Trevor Howard; Jonathan W N Smith
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 2.  Using ecosystem services to inform decisions on U.S. air quality standards.

Authors:  Anne W Rea; Christine Davis; David A Evans; Brian T Heninger; George Van Houtven
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Developing principles of sustainability and stakeholder engagement for "gentle" remediation approaches: the European context.

Authors:  A B Cundy; R P Bardos; A Church; M Puschenreiter; W Friesl-Hanl; I Müller; S Neu; M Mench; N Witters; J Vangronsveld
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 6.789

4.  Accounting for natural resources and environmental sustainability: linking ecosystem services to human well-being.

Authors:  Stephen J Jordan; Sharon E Hayes; David Yoskowitz; Lisa M Smith; J Kevin Summers; Marc Russell; William H Benson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Cost-benefit analysis as a part of sustainability assessment of remediation alternatives for contaminated land.

Authors:  Tore Söderqvist; Petra Brinkhoff; Tommy Norberg; Lars Rosén; Pär-Erik Back; Jenny Norrman
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 6.789

6.  Toward a standard lexicon for ecosystem services.

Authors:  Wayne R Munns; Anne W Rea; Marisa J Mazzotta; Lisa A Wainger; Kathryn Saterson
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.992

7.  Ecosystem services as assessment endpoints for ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  Wayne R Munns; Anne W Rea; Glenn W Suter; Lawrence Martin; Lynne Blake-Hedges; Tanja Crk; Christine Davis; Gina Ferreira; Steve Jordan; Michele Mahoney; Mace G Barron
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.992

8.  Benchmarking of Decision-Support Tools Used for Tiered Sustainable Remediation Appraisal.

Authors:  Jonathan W N Smith; Gavin Kerrison
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 2.520

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Synthesis of Two Decades of US EPA's Ecosystem Services Research to Inform Environmental, Community, and Sustainability Decision Making.

Authors:  Matthew C Harwell; Chloe A Jackson
Journal:  Sustainability       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 3.889

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.