Literature DB >> 30716638

A unified approach for protecting listed species and ecosystem services in isolated wetlands using community-level protection goals.

Sandy Raimondo1, Leah Sharpe2, Leah Oliver2, Kelly R McCaffrey2, S Thomas Purucker3, Sumathy Sinnathamby4, Jeffrey M Minucci4.   

Abstract

The protection of listed species through the Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) process is encumbered by the number and diversity of species that need protection and the limited data available to inform assessments. Ecological communities within isolated ecosystems often contain a number of biologically diverse endemic, endangered, and threatened species, as well as providing numerous ecosystem services (ES). We propose an approach that develops community-level protection goals using isolated wetlands that includes both listed species and Service Providing Units (SPUs) that drive ES for ecological risk assessments (ERAs). Community-level protection goals are achieved by developing a protection community and weighing lines of evidence to determine a set of focal species within that community upon which to base the assessment. Lines of evidence include chemical mechanism of action, likely routes of exposure, and taxa susceptibility, as well as relationships among species, and other ecological factors. We demonstrate the process using case studies of chlorpyrifos in California vernal pools and coal ash effluent in Carolina bays. In the California vernal pool case study, listed species were the primary SPUs for the ES provided by the critical habitat. The weight of evidence demonstrated the honey bee as the focal species for the terrestrial environment and the vernal pool fairy shrimp as the focal species for the aquatic environment. The protection community within the Carolina bay case study was more taxonomically diverse than vernal pools for both listed species and SPUs, with amphibians identified as the focal species for which to target mitigation goals and hazard levels. The approach presented here will reduce the time and resource investment required for assessment of risk to listed species and adds an ES perspective to demonstrate value of assessments beyond listed species concerns. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecological risk assessment; Ecosystem services; Geographically isolated wetlands; Listed species

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30716638      PMCID: PMC6604609          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  35 in total

1.  Evaluation of the AgDISP aerial spray algorithms in the AgDRIFT model.

Authors:  Sandra L Bird; Stèven G Perry; Scott L Ray; Milton E Teske
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  AgDRIFT: a model for estimating near-field spray drift from aerial applications.

Authors:  Milton E Teske; Sandra L Bird; David M Esterly; Thomas B Curbishley; Scott L Ray; Steven G Perry
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Long-range transport and global fractionation of POPs: insights from multimedia modeling studies.

Authors:  M Scheringer; M Salzmann; M Stroebe; F Wegmann; K Fenner; K Hungerbühler
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 4.  Ecotoxicological implications of aquatic disposal of coal combustion residues in the United States: a review.

Authors:  Christopher L Rowe; William A Hopkins; Justin D Congdon
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Kenneth Mellanby Review Award. Bioaccumulation of persistent organic chemicals: mechanisms and models.

Authors:  D Mackay; A Fraser
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 8.071

6.  The evolution of mass balance models of persistent organic pollutant fate in the environment.

Authors:  F Wania; D Mackay
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 8.071

7.  Using biological traits to predict species sensitivity to toxic substances.

Authors:  Donald J Baird; Paul J Van den Brink
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 6.291

8.  Assessing the influence of climate variability on atmospheric concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyls using a global-scale mass balance model (BETR-global).

Authors:  Matthew MacLeod; William J Riley; Thomas E McKone
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  A terrestrial food-chain bioaccumulation model for POPs.

Authors:  James M Armitage; Frank A P C Gobas
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Food web-specific biomagnification of persistent organic pollutants.

Authors:  Barry C Kelly; Michael G Ikonomou; Joel D Blair; Anne E Morin; Frank A P C Gobas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  1 in total

1.  A sensitivity analysis of pesticide concentrations in California Central Valley vernal pools.

Authors:  Sumathy Sinnathamby; Jeffrey M Minucci; Debra L Denton; Sandy M Raimondo; Leah Oliver; Yongping Yuan; Dirk F Young; James Hook; Ann M Pitchford; Eric Waits; S Thomas Purucker
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 8.071

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.