Literature DB >> 28370293

A framework for predicting impacts on ecosystem services from (sub)organismal responses to chemicals.

Valery E Forbes1, Chris J Salice2, Bjorn Birnir3, Randy J F Bruins4, Peter Calow5, Virginie Ducrot6, Nika Galic1, Kristina Garber7, Bret C Harvey8, Henriette Jager9, Andrew Kanarek7, Robert Pastorok10, Steve F Railsback11, Richard Rebarber12, Pernille Thorbek13.   

Abstract

Protection of ecosystem services is increasingly emphasized as a risk-assessment goal, but there are wide gaps between current ecological risk-assessment endpoints and potential effects on services provided by ecosystems. The authors present a framework that links common ecotoxicological endpoints to chemical impacts on populations and communities and the ecosystem services that they provide. This framework builds on considerable advances in mechanistic effects models designed to span multiple levels of biological organization and account for various types of biological interactions and feedbacks. For illustration, the authors introduce 2 case studies that employ well-developed and validated mechanistic effects models: the inSTREAM individual-based model for fish populations and the AQUATOX ecosystem model. They also show how dynamic energy budget theory can provide a common currency for interpreting organism-level toxicity. They suggest that a framework based on mechanistic models that predict impacts on ecosystem services resulting from chemical exposure, combined with economic valuation, can provide a useful approach for informing environmental management. The authors highlight the potential benefits of using this framework as well as the challenges that will need to be addressed in future work. Environ Toxicol Chem 2017;36:845-859.
© 2017 SETAC. © 2017 SETAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecological production function; Ecological risk assessment; Ecosystem service; Environmental management; Mechanistic effects model

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28370293      PMCID: PMC6147012          DOI: 10.1002/etc.3720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  31 in total

1.  How risky is risk assessment: the role that life history strategies play in susceptibility of species to stress.

Authors:  John D Stark; John E Banks; Roger Vargas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Pattern-oriented modelling: a 'multi-scope' for predictive systems ecology.

Authors:  Volker Grimm; Steven F Railsback
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment.

Authors:  Gerald T Ankley; Richard S Bennett; Russell J Erickson; Dale J Hoff; Michael W Hornung; Rodney D Johnson; David R Mount; John W Nichols; Christine L Russom; Patricia K Schmieder; Jose A Serrrano; Joseph E Tietge; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 4.  Dynamic energy budget theory restores coherence in biology.

Authors:  Tânia Sousa; Tiago Domingos; J-C Poggiale; S A L M Kooijman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Making sense of ecotoxicological test results: towards application of process-based models.

Authors:  Tjalling Jager; Evelyn H W Heugens; Sebastiaan A L M Kooijman
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  General unified threshold model of survival--a toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic framework for ecotoxicology.

Authors:  Tjalling Jager; Carlo Albert; Thomas G Preuss; Roman Ashauer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Environmental surveillance and monitoring--The next frontiers for high-throughput toxicology.

Authors:  Anthony L Schroeder; Gerald T Ankley; Keith A Houck; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.742

8.  Ecological models in ecotoxicology and ecological risk assessment: an introduction to the special section.

Authors:  Nika Galic; Valery Forbes
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 9.  Assessing the risks of pesticides to threatened and endangered species using population modeling: A critical review and recommendations for future work.

Authors:  Valery E Forbes; Nika Galic; Amelie Schmolke; Janna Vavra; Rob Pastorok; Pernille Thorbek
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.742

10.  Next-generation ecological risk assessment: Predicting risk from molecular initiation to ecosystem service delivery.

Authors:  Valery E Forbes; Nika Galic
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 9.621

View more
  4 in total

1.  A unified approach for protecting listed species and ecosystem services in isolated wetlands using community-level protection goals.

Authors:  Sandy Raimondo; Leah Sharpe; Leah Oliver; Kelly R McCaffrey; S Thomas Purucker; Sumathy Sinnathamby; Jeffrey M Minucci
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Incorporating Suborganismal Processes into Dynamic Energy Budget Models for Ecological Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Cheryl A Murphy; Roger M Nisbet; Philipp Antczak; Natàlia Garcia-Reyero; Andre Gergs; Konstadia Lika; Teresa Mathews; Erik B Muller; Diane Nacci; Angela Peace; Christopher H Remien; Irvin R Schultz; Louise M Stevenson; Karen H Watanabe
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 3.  The Role of Omics in the Application of Adverse Outcome Pathways for Chemical Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Erica K Brockmeier; Geoff Hodges; Thomas H Hutchinson; Emma Butler; Markus Hecker; Knut Erik Tollefsen; Natalia Garcia-Reyero; Peter Kille; Dörthe Becker; Kevin Chipman; John Colbourne; Timothy W Collette; Andrew Cossins; Mark Cronin; Peter Graystock; Steve Gutsell; Dries Knapen; Ioanna Katsiadaki; Anke Lange; Stuart Marshall; Stewart F Owen; Edward J Perkins; Stewart Plaistow; Anthony Schroeder; Daisy Taylor; Mark Viant; Gerald Ankley; Francesco Falciani
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  The AmP project: Comparing species on the basis of dynamic energy budget parameters.

Authors:  Gonçalo M Marques; Starrlight Augustine; Konstadia Lika; Laure Pecquerie; Tiago Domingos; Sebastiaan A L M Kooijman
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 4.475

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.