Literature DB >> 34326563

Downscaling a Human Well-Being Index for Environmental Management and Environmental Justice Applications in Puerto Rico.

Susan H Yee1, Elizabeth Paulukonis1, Kyle D Buck1.   

Abstract

Human well-being is often an overarching goal in environmental decision-making, yet assessments are often limited to economic, health, or ecological endpoints that are more tangible to measure. Composite indices provide a comprehensive approach to measuring well-being in terms of multi-dimensional components, such as living standards, health, education, safety, and culture. For example, the Human Well-Being Index (HWBI) framework, initially developed for the U.S. fifty states, was recently applied to quantify human well-being for Puerto Rico. However, the paucity of data at spatial scales finer than state or county levels, particularly for social metrics, poses a major limitation to quantifying well-being at neighborhood-scales relevant to decision-making. Here we demonstrate a spatial interpolation method to fill in missing fine-scale data where coarser-scale data is available. Downscaling from municipio (i.e., county-equivalent) to census-tract revealed a greater range of variability in well-being scores across Puerto Rico, in particular, a larger proportion of low well-being scores. Furthermore, while some components of wellbeing (e.g., Education, Health, Leisure Time, Safety and Security, Social Cohesion) showed consistent improvement over time from 2000-2017 across Puerto Rico, others (e.g., Connection to Nature, Cultural Fulfillment, Living Standards) were variable among census tracts, increasing for some but declining for others. We use a case study in the San Juan Bay estuary watershed to illustrate how approaches to quantify baseline levels of well-being can be used to explore potential impacts of management actions on communities, including to identify environmental justice inequalities among neighborhoods. Spatial clustering analysis was used to identify statistically significant cold or hot spots in well-being. This study demonstrates how indicators of well-being, coupled with interpolation methods to overcome limitations of data availability, can help to monitor long-term changes over time and to better communicate the potential value of ecosystem restoration or resource management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  environmental justice; estuary management; human well-being; spatial interpolation

Year:  2020        PMID: 34326563      PMCID: PMC8318134          DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Geogr        ISSN: 0143-6228


  9 in total

1.  What are the costs and benefits of biodiversity recovery in a highly polluted estuary?

Authors:  M Pascual; A Borja; J Franco; D Burdon; J P Atkins; M Elliott
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  Using economic valuation techniques to inform water resources management: a survey and critical appraisal of available techniques and an application.

Authors:  Ekin Birol; Katia Karousakis; Phoebe Koundouri
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Toward a standard lexicon for ecosystem services.

Authors:  Wayne R Munns; Anne W Rea; Marisa J Mazzotta; Lisa A Wainger; Kathryn Saterson
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.992

4.  Ability of a 9-Item Well-Being Index to Identify Distress and Stratify Quality of Life in US Workers.

Authors:  Liselotte N Dyrbye; Daniel Satele; Tait Shanafelt
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.162

5.  The health status of youth in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Brent A Langellier; Molly A Martin; Glorisa Canino; Jeremiah R Garza; Alexander N Ortega
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 1.168

Review 6.  Spatial modeling in environmental and public health research.

Authors:  Michael Jerrett; Sara Gale; Caitlin Kontgis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Ecosystem services as assessment endpoints for ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  Wayne R Munns; Anne W Rea; Glenn W Suter; Lawrence Martin; Lynne Blake-Hedges; Tanja Crk; Christine Davis; Gina Ferreira; Steve Jordan; Michele Mahoney; Mace G Barron
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.992

8.  Application of the Human Well-Being Index to Sensitive Population Divisions: A Children's Well-Being Index Development.

Authors:  Kyle D Buck; J Kevin Summers; Lisa M Smith; Linda C Harwell
Journal:  Child Indic Res       Date:  2018-08

Review 9.  Health impact assessment of urban waterway decisions.

Authors:  Katrina Smith Korfmacher; Katia Aviles; B J Cummings; William Daniell; Jared Erdmann; Valerie Garrison
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Synthesis of Two Decades of US EPA's Ecosystem Services Research to Inform Environmental, Community, and Sustainability Decision Making.

Authors:  Matthew C Harwell; Chloe A Jackson
Journal:  Sustainability       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 3.889

2.  Contributions of Ecosystem Services to Human Well-Being in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Susan Harrell Yee
Journal:  Sustainability       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.251

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.