Literature DB >> 26328505

Health professionals' opinions on supporting a cancer biobank: identification of barriers to combat biobanking pitfalls.

Nicole J Caixeiro1,2,3, Hei Lan Byun4, Joseph Descallar2,5, Janelle V Levesque1,2,5,6, Paul de Souza1,2,3,4,5, Cheok Soon Lee1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Although rarely acknowledged, a successful biobank is highly dependent on the support of the health professionals who assist the biobank in all aspects of its activities. In many cases, the lack of health professional support can be a limiting factor in the biobanking process of collecting and processing high-quality biospecimens. The aim of this study was to determine the attitudes of health professionals towards cancer biobanking. Using a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire, important aspects of biobanking, including accrual, quality, knowledge, responsiveness, impact, access, trust, governance and accreditation, were investigated. In total, 95 of 124 health and medical practitioners who were approached participated in this study (77% response rate). Health professionals in general supported the aims of biobanking with 56% of participants showing willingness to create a biobank and recruit donors (accrual), 85% understanding the importance in the storage and distribution of biospecimens (quality), 88% having an appreciation for the role of a biobank in furthering cancer research (knowledge), 70% showing awareness of the use of biospecimens in future research initiatives (responsiveness) and 73% demonstrating support for a biobank with proper control, authority and credibility measures in place (governance and accreditation). Overall, provided that proper information about the activities of the biobank and researcher access was transparent, health professionals were very willing to support cancer biobanking. These findings may assist in developing strategies for the establishment and maintenance of biobanks and aid the implementation of more effective policies and procedures to embed biobanking into routine hospital practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26328505      PMCID: PMC4930095          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  23 in total

1.  Disclosing pathogenic genetic variants to research participants: quantifying an emerging ethical responsibility.

Authors:  Christopher A Cassa; Sarah K Savage; Patrick L Taylor; Robert C Green; Amy L McGuire; Kenneth D Mandl
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Structuring public engagement for effective input in policy development on human tissue biobanking.

Authors:  Kieran C O'Doherty; A Hawkins
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  The ISBER Best Practices: Insight from the Editors of the Third Edition.

Authors:  Jim Vaught; Lori D Campbell; Fay Betsou; Debra Leiolani Garcia; Rebecca S Pugh; Katherine C Sexton; Amy P N Skubitz
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Barriers to Australian physicians' and paediatricians' involvement in randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Patrina H Y Caldwell; Jonathan C Craig; Phyllis N Butow
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2005-01-17       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 5.  Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Ross; A Grant; C Counsell; W Gillespie; I Russell; R Prescott
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Formative research on perceptions of biobanking: what community members think.

Authors:  John S Luque; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Francisco A Montel-Ishino; Mariana Arevalo; Shalanda A Bynum; Shalewa Noel-Thomas; Kristen J Wells; Clement K Gwede; Cathy D Meade
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 7.  Biobanking for better healthcare.

Authors:  Peter H J Riegman; Manuel M Morente; Fay Betsou; Pasquale de Blasio; Peter Geary
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 6.603

8.  US and Scottish health professionals' attitudes toward DNA biobanking.

Authors:  David A Leiman; Nancy M Lorenzi; Jeremy C Wyatt; Alex S F Doney; S Trent Rosenbloom
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Influence of evolution in tumor biobanking on the interpretation of translational research.

Authors:  Rebecca O Barnes; Michelle Parisien; Leigh C Murphy; Peter H Watson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  The attitudes of 1066 patients with cancer towards participation in randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  V Jenkins; D Farewell; L Batt; T Maughan; L Branston; C Langridge; L Parlour; V Farewell; L Fallowfield
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  7 in total

1.  "As Long as You Ask": A Qualitative Study of Biobanking Consent-Oncology Patients' and Health Care Professionals' Attitudes, Motivations, and Experiences-the B-PPAE Study.

Authors:  Sonia Yip; Jennifer Fleming; Heather L Shepherd; Adam Walczak; Jonathan Clark; Phyllis Butow
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-11-09

2.  Knowledge, perceptions and attitude of Egyptian physicians towards biobanking issues.

Authors:  Ahmed Samir Abdelhafiz; Eman A Sultan; Hany H Ziady; Douaa M Sayed; Walaa A Khairy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Utilizing a large-scale biobanking registry to assess patient priorities and preferences for cancer research and education.

Authors:  Cassandra A Hathaway; Erin M Siegel; Christine H Chung; Smitha Pabbathi; Jennifer Vidrine; Susan Vadaparampil; Shelley S Tworoger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Views of university students in Jordan towards Biobanking.

Authors:  Faisal Khatib; Dayana Jibrin; Joud Al-Majali; Mira Elhussieni; Sharifeh Almasaid; Mamoun Ahram
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Standard operating procedures for biobank in oncology.

Authors:  Giuseppina Bonizzi; Lorenzo Zattoni; Maria Capra; Cristina Cassi; Giulio Taliento; Mariia Ivanova; Elena Guerini-Rocco; Marzia Fumagalli; Massimo Monturano; Adriana Albini; Giuseppe Viale; Roberto Orecchia; Nicola Fusco
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-08-26

6.  Assessment of Biobanking Knowledge and Attitudes towards Biospecimen Donation among Healthcare Providers in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Abdelbaset Buhmeida; Mourad Assidi; Omar Alyazidi; Duaa Ibrahim Olwi; Ahmed Althuwaylimi; Fatimah M Yahya; Leila Arfaoui; Leena Merdad; Adel Mohammad Abuzenadah
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Raising to the Challenge: Building a Federated Biobank to Accelerate Translational Research-The University Biobank Limburg.

Authors:  Loes Linsen; Kimberly Vanhees; Evi Vanoppen; Kim Ulenaers; Suzanne Driessens; Joris Penders; Veerle Somers; Piet Stinissen; Jean-Luc Rummens
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-10-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.