Literature DB >> 19064549

Influence of evolution in tumor biobanking on the interpretation of translational research.

Rebecca O Barnes1, Michelle Parisien, Leigh C Murphy, Peter H Watson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Translational cancer research increasingly relies on human tissue biospecimens and this has coincided with a shift in tissue biobanking approach. Newer biobanks (post year 2000) deploy standard operating procedures to reduce variability around biospecimen collection. Because current translational research is based on pre-2000 and post-2000 era biospecimens, we consider whether the collection era may influence gene expression data.
DESIGN: We compared the range of breast tumor collection times from pre-2000 and post-2000 era biobanks and compared estrogen receptor (ER) protein expression with collection time. We then collected 10 breast tumor biospecimens under a standardized protocol and examined whether the expression of c-myc and ER was influenced by storage on ice < or = 24 hours.
RESULTS: The range of collection times achieved at a pre-2000 versus post-2000 era biobank differed. Thirty-two percent of biospecimens were cryopreserved within 30 minutes at the pre-2000 era biobank versus 76% at the post-2000 era biobank. Collection time and ER protein level was inversely correlated (r = -0.19, P = 0.025; n = 137). We observed a wide range in initial c-myc and ER mRNA levels (50- versus 130-fold). Although mRNA levels of both genes declined with increasing collection time, the rate of change differed because c-myc was significantly reduced after 24 hours (mean reduction to 79% of initial) versus ER (94% of initial).
CONCLUSION: The overall shift in biobanking around the year 2000 is reflected in the ranges of collection times associated with pre-2000 and post-2000 era biobanks. Because collection time can differentially alter gene expression, the biospecimen collection era should be considered in gene expression studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19064549     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  19 in total

Review 1.  Health professionals' opinions on supporting a cancer biobank: identification of barriers to combat biobanking pitfalls.

Authors:  Nicole J Caixeiro; Hei Lan Byun; Joseph Descallar; Janelle V Levesque; Paul de Souza; Cheok Soon Lee
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  A primer on a hepatocellular carcinoma bioresource bank using the cancer genome atlas guidelines: practical issues and pitfalls.

Authors:  N Thao T Nguyen; Ron T Cotton; Theresa R Harring; Jacfranz J Guiteau; Marie-Claude Gingras; David A Wheeler; Christine A O'Mahony; Richard A Gibbs; F Charles Brunicardi; John A Goss
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Biobanking in genomic medicine.

Authors:  Jane H Zhou; Aysegul A Sahin; Jeffrey N Myers
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.534

4.  Biospecimen reporting for improved study quality (BRISQ).

Authors:  Helen M Moore; Andrea B Kelly; Scott D Jewell; Lisa M McShane; Douglas P Clark; Renata Greenspan; Daniel F Hayes; Pierre Hainaut; Paula Kim; Elizabeth Mansfield; Olga Potapova; Peter Riegman; Yaffa Rubinstein; Edward Seijo; Stella Somiari; Peter Watson; Heinz-Ulrich Weier; Claire Zhu; Jim Vaught
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Biospecimen Reporting for Improved Study Quality.

Authors:  Helen M Moore; Andrea Kelly; Scott D Jewell; Lisa M McShane; Douglas P Clark; Renata Greenspan; Pierre Hainaut; Daniel F Hayes; Paula Kim; Elizabeth Mansfield; Olga Potapova; Peter Riegman; Yaffa Rubinstein; Edward Seijo; Stella Somiari; Peter Watson; Heinz-Ulrich Weier; Claire Zhu; Jim Vaught
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 6.  A critical analysis of cancer biobank practices in relation to biospecimen quality.

Authors:  Amanda Rush; Kevin Spring; Jennifer A Byrne
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2015-10-22

Review 7.  Institutional shared resources and translational cancer research.

Authors:  Paolo De Paoli
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 5.531

8.  Isothermal vitrification methodology development for non-cryogenic storage of archival human sera.

Authors:  Rebekah Less; Kristin L M Boylan; Amy P N Skubitz; Alptekin Aksan
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 9.  The procurement, storage, and quality assurance of frozen blood and tissue biospecimens in pathology, biorepository, and biobank settings.

Authors:  Maryam Shabihkhani; Gregory M Lucey; Bowen Wei; Sergey Mareninov; Jerry J Lou; Harry V Vinters; Elyse J Singer; Timothy F Cloughesy; William H Yong
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 3.281

10.  Evolutionary concepts in biobanking - the BC BioLibrary.

Authors:  Peter H Watson; Janet E Wilson-McManus; Rebecca O Barnes; Sara C Giesz; Adrian Png; Richard G Hegele; Jacquelyn N Brinkman; Ian R Mackenzie; David G Huntsman; Anne Junker; Blake Gilks; Erik Skarsgard; Michael Burgess; Samuel Aparicio; Bruce M McManus
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.