PURPOSE: Translational cancer research increasingly relies on human tissue biospecimens and this has coincided with a shift in tissue biobanking approach. Newer biobanks (post year 2000) deploy standard operating procedures to reduce variability around biospecimen collection. Because current translational research is based on pre-2000 and post-2000 era biospecimens, we consider whether the collection era may influence gene expression data. DESIGN: We compared the range of breast tumor collection times from pre-2000 and post-2000 era biobanks and compared estrogen receptor (ER) protein expression with collection time. We then collected 10 breast tumor biospecimens under a standardized protocol and examined whether the expression of c-myc and ER was influenced by storage on ice < or = 24 hours. RESULTS: The range of collection times achieved at a pre-2000 versus post-2000 era biobank differed. Thirty-two percent of biospecimens were cryopreserved within 30 minutes at the pre-2000 era biobank versus 76% at the post-2000 era biobank. Collection time and ER protein level was inversely correlated (r = -0.19, P = 0.025; n = 137). We observed a wide range in initial c-myc and ER mRNA levels (50- versus 130-fold). Although mRNA levels of both genes declined with increasing collection time, the rate of change differed because c-myc was significantly reduced after 24 hours (mean reduction to 79% of initial) versus ER (94% of initial). CONCLUSION: The overall shift in biobanking around the year 2000 is reflected in the ranges of collection times associated with pre-2000 and post-2000 era biobanks. Because collection time can differentially alter gene expression, the biospecimen collection era should be considered in gene expression studies.
PURPOSE: Translational cancer research increasingly relies on human tissue biospecimens and this has coincided with a shift in tissue biobanking approach. Newer biobanks (post year 2000) deploy standard operating procedures to reduce variability around biospecimen collection. Because current translational research is based on pre-2000 and post-2000 era biospecimens, we consider whether the collection era may influence gene expression data. DESIGN: We compared the range of breast tumor collection times from pre-2000 and post-2000 era biobanks and compared estrogen receptor (ER) protein expression with collection time. We then collected 10 breast tumor biospecimens under a standardized protocol and examined whether the expression of c-myc and ER was influenced by storage on ice < or = 24 hours. RESULTS: The range of collection times achieved at a pre-2000 versus post-2000 era biobank differed. Thirty-two percent of biospecimens were cryopreserved within 30 minutes at the pre-2000 era biobank versus 76% at the post-2000 era biobank. Collection time and ER protein level was inversely correlated (r = -0.19, P = 0.025; n = 137). We observed a wide range in initial c-myc and ER mRNA levels (50- versus 130-fold). Although mRNA levels of both genes declined with increasing collection time, the rate of change differed because c-myc was significantly reduced after 24 hours (mean reduction to 79% of initial) versus ER (94% of initial). CONCLUSION: The overall shift in biobanking around the year 2000 is reflected in the ranges of collection times associated with pre-2000 and post-2000 era biobanks. Because collection time can differentially alter gene expression, the biospecimen collection era should be considered in gene expression studies.
Authors: Nicole J Caixeiro; Hei Lan Byun; Joseph Descallar; Janelle V Levesque; Paul de Souza; Cheok Soon Lee Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: N Thao T Nguyen; Ron T Cotton; Theresa R Harring; Jacfranz J Guiteau; Marie-Claude Gingras; David A Wheeler; Christine A O'Mahony; Richard A Gibbs; F Charles Brunicardi; John A Goss Journal: World J Surg Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Helen M Moore; Andrea B Kelly; Scott D Jewell; Lisa M McShane; Douglas P Clark; Renata Greenspan; Daniel F Hayes; Pierre Hainaut; Paula Kim; Elizabeth Mansfield; Olga Potapova; Peter Riegman; Yaffa Rubinstein; Edward Seijo; Stella Somiari; Peter Watson; Heinz-Ulrich Weier; Claire Zhu; Jim Vaught Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2011-06-21 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Helen M Moore; Andrea Kelly; Scott D Jewell; Lisa M McShane; Douglas P Clark; Renata Greenspan; Pierre Hainaut; Daniel F Hayes; Paula Kim; Elizabeth Mansfield; Olga Potapova; Peter Riegman; Yaffa Rubinstein; Edward Seijo; Stella Somiari; Peter Watson; Heinz-Ulrich Weier; Claire Zhu; Jim Vaught Journal: Biopreserv Biobank Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 2.300
Authors: Maryam Shabihkhani; Gregory M Lucey; Bowen Wei; Sergey Mareninov; Jerry J Lou; Harry V Vinters; Elyse J Singer; Timothy F Cloughesy; William H Yong Journal: Clin Biochem Date: 2014-01-12 Impact factor: 3.281
Authors: Peter H Watson; Janet E Wilson-McManus; Rebecca O Barnes; Sara C Giesz; Adrian Png; Richard G Hegele; Jacquelyn N Brinkman; Ian R Mackenzie; David G Huntsman; Anne Junker; Blake Gilks; Erik Skarsgard; Michael Burgess; Samuel Aparicio; Bruce M McManus Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2009-11-12 Impact factor: 5.531