Literature DB >> 22147367

Disclosing pathogenic genetic variants to research participants: quantifying an emerging ethical responsibility.

Christopher A Cassa1, Sarah K Savage, Patrick L Taylor, Robert C Green, Amy L McGuire, Kenneth D Mandl.   

Abstract

There is an emerging consensus that when investigators obtain genomic data from research participants, they may incur an ethical responsibility to inform at-risk individuals about clinically significant variants discovered during the course of their research. With whole-exome sequencing becoming commonplace and the falling costs of full-genome sequencing, there will be an increasingly large number of variants identified in research participants that may be of sufficient clinical relevance to share. An explicit approach to triaging and communicating these results has yet to be developed, and even the magnitude of the task is uncertain. To develop an estimate of the number of variants that might qualify for disclosure, we apply recently published recommendations for the return of results to a defined and representative set of variants and then extrapolate these estimates to genome scale. We find that the total number of variants meeting the threshold for recommended disclosure ranges from 3955-12,579 (3.79%-12.06%, 95% CI) in the most conservative estimate to 6998-17,189 (6.69%-16.48%, 95% CI) in an estimate including variants with variable disease expressivity. Additionally, if the growth rate from the previous 4 yr continues, we estimate that the total number of disease-associated variants will grow 37% over the next 4 yr.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22147367      PMCID: PMC3290777          DOI: 10.1101/gr.127845.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  38 in total

1.  Informed consent for research on stored blood and tissue samples: a survey of institutional review board practices.

Authors:  Mary Terrell White; Jennifer Gamm
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2002 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  The incidentalome: a threat to genomic medicine.

Authors:  Isaac S Kohane; Daniel R Masys; Russ B Altman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Obligations in offering to disclose genetic research results.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; Charles Weijer
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  Informed consent for population-based research involving genetics.

Authors:  L M Beskow; W Burke; J F Merz; P A Barr; S Terry; V B Penchaszadeh; L O Gostin; M Gwinn; M J Khoury
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Offering individual genetic research results: context matters.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 6.  Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Frances P Lawrenz; Charles A Nelson; Jeffrey P Kahn; Mildred K Cho; Ellen Wright Clayton; Joel G Fletcher; Michael K Georgieff; Dale Hammerschmidt; Kathy Hudson; Judy Illes; Vivek Kapur; Moira A Keane; Barbara A Koenig; Bonnie S Leroy; Elizabeth G McFarland; Jordan Paradise; Lisa S Parker; Sharon F Terry; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

7.  Ethical consideration of incidental findings on adult brain MRI in research.

Authors:  J Illes; A C Rosen; L Huang; R A Goldstein; T A Raffin; G Swan; S W Atlas
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-03-23       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  The genomic applications in practice and prevention network.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; W Gregory Feero; Michele Reyes; Toby Citrin; Andrew Freedman; Debra Leonard; Wylie Burke; Ralph Coates; Robert T Croyle; Karen Edwards; Sharon Kardia; Colleen McBride; Teri Manolio; Gurvaneet Randhawa; Rebekah Rasooly; Jeannette St Pierre; Sharon Terry
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) Initiative: methods of the EGAPP Working Group.

Authors:  Steven M Teutsch; Linda A Bradley; Glenn E Palomaki; James E Haddow; Margaret Piper; Ned Calonge; W David Dotson; Michael P Douglas; Alfred O Berg
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  CLIA-tested genetic variants on commercial SNP arrays: potential for incidental findings in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Andrew D Johnson; Anupama Bhimavarapu; Emelia J Benjamin; Caroline Fox; Daniel Levy; Gail P Jarvik; Christopher J O'Donnell
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  51 in total

1.  Automatic Placement of Genomic Research Results in Medical Records: Do Researchers Have a Duty? Should Participants Have a Choice?

Authors:  Anya E R Prince; John M Conley; Arlene M Davis; Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz; R Jean Cadigan
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 2.  Health professionals' opinions on supporting a cancer biobank: identification of barriers to combat biobanking pitfalls.

Authors:  Nicole J Caixeiro; Hei Lan Byun; Joseph Descallar; Janelle V Levesque; Paul de Souza; Cheok Soon Lee
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Public views on participating in newborn screening using genome sequencing.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Fiona A Miller; Robin Z Hayeems; Carolyn Barg; Celine Cressman; June C Carroll; Brenda J Wilson; Julian Little; Denise Avard; Michael Painter-Main; Judith Allanson; Yves Giguere; Pranesh Chakraborty
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 4.  Applications of high-throughput DNA sequencing to benign hematology.

Authors:  Vijay G Sankaran; Patrick G Gallagher
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Return of individual research results and incidental findings: facing the challenges of translational science.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 8.929

6.  Three clinical experiences with SNP array results consistent with parental incest: a narrative with lessons learned.

Authors:  Benjamin M Helm; Katherine Langley; Brooke Spangler; Samantha Vergano
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  Getting personal: Head and neck cancer management in the era of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Andrew C Birkeland; Wendy R Uhlmann; J Chad Brenner; Andrew G Shuman
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 8.  Whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing in neurological diseases.

Authors:  Jia-Nee Foo; Jian-Jun Liu; Eng-King Tan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 42.937

9.  Rapid whole-genome sequencing for genetic disease diagnosis in neonatal intensive care units.

Authors:  Carol Jean Saunders; Neil Andrew Miller; Sarah Elizabeth Soden; Darrell Lee Dinwiddie; Aaron Noll; Noor Abu Alnadi; Nevene Andraws; Melanie LeAnn Patterson; Lisa Ann Krivohlavek; Joel Fellis; Sean Humphray; Peter Saffrey; Zoya Kingsbury; Jacqueline Claire Weir; Jason Betley; Russell James Grocock; Elliott Harrison Margulies; Emily Gwendolyn Farrow; Michael Artman; Nicole Pauline Safina; Joshua Erin Petrikin; Kevin Peter Hall; Stephen Francis Kingsmore
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 10.  Next-generation sequencing diagnostics for neurological diseases/disorders: from a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Jia Nee Foo; Jianjun Liu; Eng-King Tan
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.