| Literature DB >> 26321097 |
Kylie L Gorringe1,2,3, Sally M Hunter1, Jia-Min Pang4, Ken Opeskin5, Prue Hill5, Simone M Rowley1, David Y H Choong1, Ella R Thompson1,2,3, Alexander Dobrovic2,6,7, Stephen B Fox4, G Bruce Mann8,9, Ian G Campbell1,2,3.
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-obligate precursor of invasive breast cancer and a frequent mammographic finding requiring treatment. Up to 25% of DCIS can recur and half of recurrences are invasive, but there are no reliable biomarkers for recurrence. We hypothesised that copy number aberrations could predict likelihood of recurrence. We analysed a cohort of pure DCIS cases treated only with wide local excision for genome-wide copy number and loss of heterozygosity using Affymetrix OncoScan MIP arrays. Cases included those without recurrence within 7 years (n = 25) and with recurrence between 1 and 5 years after diagnosis (n = 15). Pure DCIS were broadly similar in copy number changes compared with invasive breast cancer, with the consistent exception of a greater frequency of ERBB2 amplification in DCIS. There were no significant differences in age or ER status between the cases with a recurrence vs those without. Overall, the DCIS cases with recurrence had more copy number events than the DCIS without recurrence. The increased copy number appeared non-random with several genomic regions showing an increase in frequency in recurrent cases, including 20 q gain, ERBB2 amplification and 15q loss. Copy number changes may provide prognostic information for DCIS recurrence, but validation in additional cohorts is required.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26321097 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2015.75
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mod Pathol ISSN: 0893-3952 Impact factor: 7.842