Literature DB >> 22912389

Profiles of genomic instability in high-grade serous ovarian cancer predict treatment outcome.

Zhigang C Wang1, Nicolai Juul Birkbak, Aedín C Culhane, Ronny Drapkin, Aquila Fatima, Ruiyang Tian, Matthew Schwede, Kathryn Alsop, Kathryn E Daniels, Huiying Piao, Joyce Liu, Dariush Etemadmoghadam, Alexander Miron, Helga B Salvesen, Gillian Mitchell, Anna DeFazio, John Quackenbush, Ross S Berkowitz, J Dirk Iglehart, David D L Bowtell, Ursula A Matulonis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: High-grade serous cancer (HGSC) is the most common cancer of the ovary and is characterized by chromosomal instability. Defects in homologous recombination repair (HRR) are associated with genomic instability in HGSC, and are exploited by therapy targeting DNA repair. Defective HRR causes uniparental deletions and loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Our purpose is to profile LOH in HGSC and correlate our findings to clinical outcome, and compare HGSC and high-grade breast cancers. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We examined LOH and copy number changes using single nucleotide polymorphism array data from three HGSC cohorts and compared results to a cohort of high-grade breast cancers. The LOH profiles in HGSC were matched to chemotherapy resistance and progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS: LOH-based clustering divided HGSC into two clusters. The major group displayed extensive LOH and was further divided into two subgroups. The second group contained remarkably less LOH. BRCA1 promoter methylation was associated with the major group. LOH clusters were reproducible when validated in two independent HGSC datasets. LOH burden in the major cluster of HGSC was similar to triple-negative, and distinct from other high-grade breast cancers. Our analysis revealed an LOH cluster with lower treatment resistance and a significant correlation between LOH burden and PFS.
CONCLUSIONS: Separating HGSC by LOH-based clustering produces remarkably stable subgroups in three different cohorts. Patients in the various LOH clusters differed with respect to chemotherapy resistance, and the extent of LOH correlated with PFS. LOH burden may indicate vulnerability to treatment targeting DNA repair, such as PARP1 inhibitors. ©2012 AACR

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22912389      PMCID: PMC4205235          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  47 in total

1.  Development of a functional assay for homologous recombination status in primary cultures of epithelial ovarian tumor and correlation with sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors.

Authors:  Asima Mukhopadhyay; Ahmed Elattar; Aiste Cerbinskaite; Sarah J Wilkinson; Yvette Drew; Suzanne Kyle; Gerrit Los; Zdenek Hostomsky; Richard J Edmondson; Nicola J Curtin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  BRCA1 promoter methylation in sporadic breast tumors: relationship to gene expression profiles.

Authors:  Evan Matros; Zhigang C Wang; Gabriela Lodeiro; Alexander Miron; J Dirk Iglehart; Andrea L Richardson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors:  C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Improved survival in women with BRCA-associated ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Ilana Cass; Rae Lynn Baldwin; Taz Varkey; Roxana Moslehi; Steven A Narod; Beth Y Karlan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Platinum compounds 30 years after the introduction of cisplatin: implications for the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Franco Muggia
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  X chromosomal abnormalities in basal-like human breast cancer.

Authors:  Andrea L Richardson; Zhigang C Wang; Arcangela De Nicolo; Xin Lu; Myles Brown; Alexander Miron; Xiaodong Liao; J Dirk Iglehart; David M Livingston; Shridar Ganesan
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 31.743

7.  High-resolution single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis of epithelial ovarian cancer reveals numerous microdeletions and amplifications.

Authors:  Kylie L Gorringe; Sharoni Jacobs; Ella R Thompson; Anita Sridhar; Wen Qiu; David Y H Choong; Ian G Campbell
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Amplification of LAPTM4B and YWHAZ contributes to chemotherapy resistance and recurrence of breast cancer.

Authors:  Yang Li; Lihua Zou; Qiyuan Li; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Ruiyang Tian; Yan Li; Christine Desmedt; Christos Sotiriou; Zoltan Szallasi; J Dirk Iglehart; Andrea L Richardson; Zhigang Charles Wang
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2010-01-24       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  Major copy proportion analysis of tumor samples using SNP arrays.

Authors:  Cheng Li; Rameen Beroukhim; Barbara A Weir; Wendy Winckler; Levi A Garraway; William R Sellers; Matthew Meyerson
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Complex landscapes of somatic rearrangement in human breast cancer genomes.

Authors:  Philip J Stephens; David J McBride; Meng-Lay Lin; Ignacio Varela; Erin D Pleasance; Jared T Simpson; Lucy A Stebbings; Catherine Leroy; Sarah Edkins; Laura J Mudie; Chris D Greenman; Mingming Jia; Calli Latimer; Jon W Teague; King Wai Lau; John Burton; Michael A Quail; Harold Swerdlow; Carol Churcher; Rachael Natrajan; Anieta M Sieuwerts; John W M Martens; Daniel P Silver; Anita Langerød; Hege E G Russnes; John A Foekens; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Laura van 't Veer; Andrea L Richardson; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Peter J Campbell; P Andrew Futreal; Michael R Stratton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  65 in total

Review 1.  Latest research and treatment of advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Robert L Coleman; Bradley J Monk; Anil K Sood; Thomas J Herzog
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Genomic Characterization of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: Dissecting Its Molecular Heterogeneity as a Road Towards Effective Therapeutic Strategies.

Authors:  Lorenza Mittempergher
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Identification and use of biomarkers in treatment strategies for triple-negative breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Brian D Lehmann; Jennifer A Pietenpol
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 7.996

4.  A P53-Independent DNA Damage Response Suppresses Oncogenic Proliferation and Genome Instability.

Authors:  Katerina D Fagan-Solis; Dennis A Simpson; Rashmi J Kumar; Luciano G Martelotto; Lisle E Mose; Naim U Rashid; Alice Y Ho; Simon N Powell; Y Hannah Wen; Joel S Parker; Jorge S Reis-Filho; John H J Petrini; Gaorav P Gupta
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 9.423

5.  The Damaging Effect of Passenger Mutations on Cancer Progression.

Authors:  Christopher D McFarland; Julia A Yaglom; Jonathan W Wojtkowiak; Jacob G Scott; David L Morse; Michael Y Sherman; Leonid A Mirny
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  TP53 mutations, tetraploidy and homologous recombination repair defects in early stage high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jeremy Chien; Hugues Sicotte; Jian-Bing Fan; Sean Humphray; Julie M Cunningham; Kimberly R Kalli; Ann L Oberg; Steven N Hart; Ying Li; Jaime I Davila; Saurabh Baheti; Chen Wang; Sabine Dietmann; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Yan W Asmann; Debra A Bell; Takayo Ota; Yaman Tarabishy; Rui Kuang; Marina Bibikova; R Keira Cheetham; Russell J Grocock; Elizabeth M Swisher; John Peden; David Bentley; Jean-Pierre A Kocher; Scott H Kaufmann; Lynn C Hartmann; Viji Shridhar; Ellen L Goode
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  53BP1 expression in sporadic and inherited ovarian carcinoma: Relationship to genetic status and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Kathryn P Pennington; Anneka Wickramanayake; Barbara M Norquist; Christopher C Pennil; Rochelle L Garcia; Kathy J Agnew; Toshiyasu Taniguchi; Piri Welcsh; Elizabeth M Swisher
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Copy neutral loss of heterozygosity is more frequent in older ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Brent S Pedersen; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos; Monique A Spillman; Subhajyoti De
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 5.006

9.  Copy number analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ with and without recurrence.

Authors:  Kylie L Gorringe; Sally M Hunter; Jia-Min Pang; Ken Opeskin; Prue Hill; Simone M Rowley; David Y H Choong; Ella R Thompson; Alexander Dobrovic; Stephen B Fox; G Bruce Mann; Ian G Campbell
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 10.  The rise of genomic profiling in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca A Previs; Anil K Sood; Gordon B Mills; Shannon N Westin
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.