Literature DB >> 16985023

Genomic instability and prognosis in breast carcinomas.

Ulrike Kronenwett1, Alexander Ploner, Anders Zetterberg, Jonas Bergh, Per Hall, Gert Auer, Yudi Pawitan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We recently reported that DNA content of breast adenocarcinomas, cytometrically assessed by diploid (D), tetraploid (T), and aneuploid (A) categories, can be further divided into genomically stable and unstable subtypes by means of the stemline scatter index (SSI). The aim of the present study was to survey the clinical correlates and the prognostic value of the SSI in a consecutive series of 890 breast cancer patients.
RESULTS: Genomically stable subtype had a significantly better survival compared with the unstable subtype within each ploidy category: D (P = 0.04), T (P = 0.008), and A (P = 0.004). By contrast, no statistically significant difference in survival was observed between the D, T, and A categories within the stable (P = 0.23) and unstable subtypes (P = 0.12). Among A tumors, the unstable subtype tended to be larger, more frequently estrogen- and progesterone-receptor negative, and to be of higher grade compared with the stable subtype. Stable D tumors tended to have lower grade than the unstable subtype, but among the D and T tumors, genomic instability was not associated with receptor status. Within the Elston grade 3, lymph node-positive or estrogen receptor-positive subgroups, patients with stable tumors had significantly better survival compared with unstable tumors (P = 0.01, 0.002, and 7.2E-5, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The SSI contributes supplementary biological and clinical information in addition to ploidy information alone. Objective classification of breast adenocarcinomas into stable and unstable subtypes is a useful prognostic indicator independent of established clinical factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16985023     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  19 in total

1.  2n or not 2n: Aneuploidy, polyploidy and chromosomal instability in primary and tumor cells.

Authors:  Lauren M Zasadil; Eric M C Britigan; Beth A Weaver
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 7.727

2.  A 12-gene genomic instability signature predicts clinical outcomes in multiple cancer types.

Authors:  Rama K R Mettu; Ying-Wooi Wan; Jens K Habermann; Thomas Ried; Nancy Lan Guo
Journal:  Int J Biol Markers       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.659

3.  Copy number analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ with and without recurrence.

Authors:  Kylie L Gorringe; Sally M Hunter; Jia-Min Pang; Ken Opeskin; Prue Hill; Simone M Rowley; David Y H Choong; Ella R Thompson; Alexander Dobrovic; Stephen B Fox; G Bruce Mann; Ian G Campbell
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  The gene expression signature of genomic instability in breast cancer is an independent predictor of clinical outcome.

Authors:  Jens K Habermann; Jana Doering; Sampsa Hautaniemi; Uwe J Roblick; Nana K Bündgen; Daniel Nicorici; Ulrike Kronenwett; Shruti Rathnagiriswaran; Rama K R Mettu; Yan Ma; Stefan Krüger; Hans-Peter Bruch; Gert Auer; Nancy L Guo; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Axillary lymph node metastasis and survival in breast cancer patients with concurrent cardio-cerebral-vascular disease.

Authors:  Roland Sennerstam; Kai-Uwe Schässburger; Nils Stormby; Hans Wiksell; Gert Auer
Journal:  JRSM Short Rep       Date:  2011-02-18

6.  Impact of genomic stability on protein expression in endometrioid endometrial cancer.

Authors:  M I Lomnytska; S Becker; T Gemoll; C Lundgren; J Habermann; A Olsson; I Bodin; U Engström; U Hellman; K Hellman; A-C Hellström; S Andersson; M Mints; G Auer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Clinico-Pathological Correlation of β-Catenin and Telomere Dysfunction in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients.

Authors:  Swatishree Padhi; Arka Saha; Madhabananda Kar; Chinmoy Ghosh; Amit Adhya; Manas Baisakh; Nachiketa Mohapatra; Shriram Venkatesan; Manoor Prakash Hande; Birendranath Banerjee
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 4.207

8.  Genomic instability and proliferative activity as risk factors for distant metastases in breast cancer.

Authors:  L Li; K Mu; G Zhou; L Lan; G Auer; A Zetterberg
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Ki-67 expression predicts locoregional recurrence in stage I oral tongue carcinoma.

Authors:  D Wangsa; M Ryott; E Avall-Lundqvist; F Petersson; G Elmberger; J Luo; T Ried; G Auer; E Munck-Wikland
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Computational prognostic indicators for breast cancer.

Authors:  Xinan Yang; Xindi Ai; John M Cunningham
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 3.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.