Literature DB >> 28338653

Breast ductal carcinoma in situ carry mutational driver events representative of invasive breast cancer.

Jia-Min B Pang1,2, Peter Savas3, Andrew P Fellowes1, Gisela Mir Arnau4, Tanjina Kader5,6, Ravikiran Vedururu1, Chelsee Hewitt1, Elena A Takano1, David J Byrne1, David Yh Choong1, Ewan Ka Millar7,8,9,10, C Soon Lee10,11,12, Sandra A O'Toole7,11,13, Sunil R Lakhani14,15, Margaret C Cummings14,15, G Bruce Mann16,17, Ian G Campbell5,6, Alexander Dobrovic18, Sherene Loi3,5, Kylie L Gorringe2,5,6, Stephen B Fox1,2,5.   

Abstract

The spectrum of genomic alterations in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is relatively unexplored, but is likely to provide useful insights into its biology, its progression to invasive carcinoma and the risk of recurrence. DCIS (n=20) with a range of phenotypes was assessed by massively parallel sequencing for mutations and copy number alterations and variants validated by Sanger sequencing. PIK3CA mutations were identified in 11/20 (55%), TP53 mutations in 6/20 (30%), and GATA3 mutations in 9/20 (45%). Screening an additional 91 cases for GATA3 mutations identified a final frequency of 27% (30/111), with a high proportion of missense variants (8/30). TP53 mutations were exclusive to high grade DCIS and more frequent in PR-negative tumors compared with PR-positive tumors (P=0.037). TP53 mutant tumors also had a significantly higher fraction of the genome altered by copy number than wild-type tumors (P=0.005), including a significant positive association with amplification or gain of ERBB2 (P<0.05). The association between TP53 mutation and ERBB2 amplification was confirmed in a wider DCIS cohort using p53 immunohistochemistry as a surrogate marker for TP53 mutations (P=0.03). RUNX1 mutations and MAP2K4 copy number loss were novel findings in DCIS. Frequent copy number alterations included gains on 1q, 8q, 17q, and 20q and losses on 8p, 11q, 16q, and 17p. Patterns of genomic alterations observed in DCIS were similar to those previously reported for invasive breast cancers, with all DCIS having at least one bona fide breast cancer driver event. However, an increase in GATA3 mutations and fewer copy number changes were noted in DCIS compared with invasive carcinomas. The role of such alterations as prognostic and predictive biomarkers in DCIS is an avenue for further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28338653     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  43 in total

1.  Enhancements and modifications of primer design program Primer3.

Authors:  Triinu Koressaar; Maido Remm
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Immunohistochemical staining patterns of p53 can serve as a surrogate marker for TP53 mutations in ovarian carcinoma: an immunohistochemical and nucleotide sequencing analysis.

Authors:  Anna Yemelyanova; Russell Vang; Malti Kshirsagar; Dan Lu; Morgan A Marks; Ie Ming Shih; Robert J Kurman
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  PIK3CA mutations in in situ and invasive breast carcinomas.

Authors:  Alexander Miron; Maria Varadi; Daniel Carrasco; Hailun Li; Lauren Luongo; Hee Jung Kim; So Yeon Park; Eun Yoon Cho; Gretchen Lewis; Sarah Kehoe; J Dirk Iglehart; Deborah Dillon; D Craig Allred; Laura Macconaill; Rebecca Gelman; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Genetic mutations and expression of p53 in non-invasive breast lesions.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Mao; Chuifeng Fan; Jing Wei; Fan Yao; Feng Jin
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.952

5.  Mutation of the TP53 gene and allelic imbalance at chromosome 17p13 in ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  K E Munn; R A Walker; L Menasce; J M Varley
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Copy number analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ with and without recurrence.

Authors:  Kylie L Gorringe; Sally M Hunter; Jia-Min Pang; Ken Opeskin; Prue Hill; Simone M Rowley; David Y H Choong; Ella R Thompson; Alexander Dobrovic; Stephen B Fox; G Bruce Mann; Ian G Campbell
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  PIK3CA mutation associates with improved outcome in breast cancer.

Authors:  Kevin Kalinsky; Lindsay M Jacks; Adriana Heguy; Sujata Patil; Marija Drobnjak; Umeshkumar K Bhanot; Cyrus V Hedvat; Tiffany A Traina; David Solit; William Gerald; Mary Ellen Moynahan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Mutation of GATA3 in human breast tumors.

Authors:  Jerry Usary; Victor Llaca; Gamze Karaca; Shafaq Presswala; Mehmet Karaca; Xiaping He; Anita Langerød; Rolf Kåresen; Daniel S Oh; Lynn G Dressler; Per E Lønning; Robert L Strausberg; Stephen Chanock; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase and AKT1 mutations occur early in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Jennifer Dunlap; Claudia Le; Arielle Shukla; Janice Patterson; Ajia Presnell; Michael C Heinrich; Christopher L Corless; Megan L Troxell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes.

Authors:  Goncalo R Abecasis; Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Mark A DePristo; Richard M Durbin; Robert E Handsaker; Hyun Min Kang; Gabor T Marth; Gil A McVean
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  24 in total

1.  The genetic architecture of breast papillary lesions as a predictor of progression to carcinoma.

Authors:  Ian G Campbell; Kylie L Gorringe; Tanjina Kader; Kenneth Elder; Magnus Zethoven; Timothy Semple; Prue Hill; David L Goode; Niko Thio; Dane Cheasley; Simone M Rowley; David J Byrne; Jia-Min Pang; Islam M Miligy; Andrew R Green; Emad A Rakha; Stephen B Fox; G Bruce Mann
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-03-12

Review 2.  Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Chaos and Consequence.

Authors:  Vidya C Sinha; Helen Piwnica-Worms
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 3.  Ductal carcinoma in situ of breast: update 2019.

Authors:  Sunil S Badve; Yesim Gökmen-Polar
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 5.306

Review 4.  Is loss of p53 a driver of ductal carcinoma in situ progression?

Authors:  Rhiannon L Morrissey; Alastair M Thompson; Guillermina Lozano
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 5.  Functional Role of miRNAs in the Progression of Breast Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.

Authors:  Bethany N Hannafon; Wei-Qun Ding
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 6.  Breaking through to the Other Side: Microenvironment Contributions to DCIS Initiation and Progression.

Authors:  Andrew C Nelson; Heather L Machado; Kathryn L Schwertfeger
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 2.673

7.  Long noncoding RNA BHLHE40-AS1 promotes early breast cancer progression through modulating IL-6/STAT3 signaling.

Authors:  Rebecca S DeVaux; Ali S Ropri; Sandra L Grimm; Peter A Hall; Emilio O Herrera; Sridar V Chittur; William P Smith; Cristian Coarfa; Fariba Behbod; Jason I Herschkowitz
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 4.429

Review 8.  Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Biomarkers in a Precision Medicine Era: Current and Future Molecular-Based Testing.

Authors:  Kevin Shee; Kristen E Muller; Jonathan Marotti; Todd W Miller; Wendy A Wells; Gregory J Tsongalis
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Everolimus Inhibits the Progression of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ to Invasive Breast Cancer Via Downregulation of MMP9 Expression.

Authors:  Guang Chen; Xiao-Fei Ding; Kyle Pressley; Hakim Bouamar; Bingzhi Wang; Guixi Zheng; Larry E Broome; Alia Nazarullah; Andrew J Brenner; Virginia Kaklamani; Ismail Jatoi; Lu-Zhe Sun
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Multi-Omics Marker Analysis Enables Early Prediction of Breast Tumor Progression.

Authors:  Haifeng Xu; Tonje Lien; Helga Bergholtz; Thomas Fleischer; Lounes Djerroudi; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Therese Sørlie; Tero Aittokallio
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.