Literature DB >> 20427430

Biomarker expression and risk of subsequent tumors after initial ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis.

Karla Kerlikowske1, Annette M Molinaro, Mona L Gauthier, Hal K Berman, Fred Waldman, James Bennington, Henry Sanchez, Cynthia Jimenez, Kim Stewart, Karen Chew, Britt-Marie Ljung, Thea D Tlsty.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies have failed to identify characteristics of women who have been diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and have a high or low risk of subsequent invasive cancer.
METHODS: We conducted a nested case-control study in a population-based cohort of 1162 women who were diagnosed with DCIS and treated by lumpectomy alone from 1983 to 1994. We collected clinical characteristics and information on subsequent tumors, defined as invasive breast cancer or DCIS diagnosed in the ipsilateral breast containing the initial DCIS lesion or at a regional or distant site greater than 6 months after initial treatment of DCIS (N = 324). We also conducted standardized pathology reviews and immunohistochemical staining for the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor, Ki67 antigen, p53, p16, epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (ERBB2, HER2/neu oncoprotein), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) on the initial paraffin-embedded DCIS tissue. Competing risk models were used to determine factors associated with risk of subsequent invasive cancer vs DCIS, and cumulative incidence survival functions were used to estimate 8-year risk.
RESULTS: Factors associated with subsequent invasive cancer differed from those associated with subsequent DCIS. Eight-year risk of subsequent invasive cancer was statistically significantly (P = .018) higher for women with initial DCIS lesions that were detected by palpation or that were p16, COX-2, and Ki67 triple positive (p16(+)COX-2(+)Ki67(+)) (19.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 18.0% to 21.3%) than for women with initial lesions that were detected by mammography and were p16, COX-2, and Ki67 triple negative (p16(-)COX-2(-)Ki67(-)) (4.1%, 95% CI = 3.4% to 5.0%). In a multivariable model, DCIS lesions that were p16(+)COX-2(+)Ki67(+) or those detected by palpation were statistically significantly associated with subsequent invasive cancer, but nuclear grade was not. Eight-year risk of subsequent DCIS was highest for women with DCIS lesions that had disease-free margins of 1 mm or greater combined with either ER(-)ERBB2(+)Ki67(+) or p16(+)COX-2(-)Ki67(+) status (23.6%, 95% CI = 18.1% to 34.0%).
CONCLUSION: Biomarkers can identify which women who were initially diagnosed with DCIS are at high or low risk of subsequent invasive cancer, whereas histopathology information cannot.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20427430      PMCID: PMC2864293          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djq101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  43 in total

Review 1.  Consensus Conference on the Treatment of In Situ Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast, April 22-25, 1999.

Authors:  G F Schwartz; L J Solin; I A Olivotto; V L Ernster; P I Pressman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Predicting axillary nodal positivity in 2282 patients with breast carcinoma.

Authors:  M J Silverstein; K A Skinner; T J Lomis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-05-14       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Consistency in the observation of features used to classify duct carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast.

Authors:  A G Douglas-Jones; J M Morgan; M A Appleton; R L Attanoos; A Caslin; C S Champ; M Cotter; N S Dallimore; A Dawson; R W Fortt; A P Griffiths; M Hughes; P A Kitching; C O'Brien; A M Rashid; D Stock; A Verghese; D W Williams; N W Williams; S Williams
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Impact of young age on outcome in patients with ductal carcinoma-in-situ treated with breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  F A Vicini; L L Kestin; N S Goldstein; P Y Chen; J Pettinga; R C Frazier; A A Martinez
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Radiotherapy in breast-conserving treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: first results of the EORTC randomised phase III trial 10853. EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and EORTC Radiotherapy Group.

Authors:  J P Julien; N Bijker; I S Fentiman; J L Peterse; V Delledonne; P Rouanet; A Avril; R Sylvester; F Mignolet; H Bartelink; J A Van Dongen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-02-12       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Pathologists' agreement with experts and reproducibility of breast ductal carcinoma-in-situ classification schemes.

Authors:  W A Wells; P A Carney; M S Eliassen; M R Grove; A N Tosteson
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 7.  Epidemiology of contralateral breast cancer.

Authors:  Y Chen; W Thompson; R Semenciw; Y Mao
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Prevention of invasive breast cancer in women with ductal carcinoma in situ: an update of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project experience.

Authors:  B Fisher; S Land; E Mamounas; J Dignam; E R Fisher; N Wolmark
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.929

9.  Mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated with breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation: long-term outcome and prognostic significance of patient age and margin status.

Authors:  L J Solin; A Fourquet; F A Vicini; B Haffty; M Taylor; B McCormick; M McNeese; L J Pierce; C Landmann; I A Olivotto; J Borger; J Kim; A de la Rochefordiere; D J Schultz
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Mortality among women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the population-based surveillance, epidemiology and end results program.

Authors:  V L Ernster; J Barclay; K Kerlikowske; H Wilkie; R Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-04-10
View more
  124 in total

1.  Challenges in ductal carcinoma in situ risk communication and decision-making: report from an American Cancer Society and National Cancer Institute workshop.

Authors:  Ann H Partridge; Joann G Elmore; Debbie Saslow; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Stuart J Schnitt
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Perspectives on personalized cancer care.

Authors:  Garrett M Dancika; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.498

3.  Molecular biology: Marked progress.

Authors:  Hannah Hoag
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Inflammation-induced oxidative stress in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Aline Tengan Roque; Rafael Zuppardo Gambeloni; Simone Felitti; Marcelo Lima Ribeiro; Juliana Carvalho Santos
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Impact of cyclooxygenase-2 over-expression on the prognosis of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Sertaç Ata Güler; Mustafa Ümit Uğurlu; Handan Kaya; Semiha Şen; Yasemin Nazlı; Bahadır M Güllüoğlu
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2015-06-01

6.  Comparison of HER2 amplification status among breast cancer subgroups offers new insights in pathways of breast cancer progression.

Authors:  Kathleen Lambein; Mieke Van Bockstal; Lies Vandemaele; Rudy Van den Broecke; Veronique Cocquyt; Sofie Geenen; Hannelore Denys; Louis Libbrecht
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Variation in detection of ductal carcinoma in situ during screening mammography: a survey within the International Cancer Screening Network.

Authors:  Elsebeth Lynge; Antonio Ponti; Ted James; Ondřej Májek; My von Euler-Chelpin; Ahti Anttila; Patricia Fitzpatrick; Alfonso Frigerio; Masaaki Kawai; Astrid Scharpantgen; Mireille Broeders; Solveig Hofvind; Carmen Vidal; Maria Ederra; Dolores Salas; Jean-Luc Bulliard; Mariano Tomatis; Karla Kerlikowske; Stephen Taplin
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Incidence, characteristics, and management of recently diagnosed, microscopically invasive breast cancer by receptor status: Iowa SEER 2000 to 2013.

Authors:  Alexandra Thomas; Ronald J Weigel; Charles F Lynch; Philip M Spanheimer; Elizabeth K Breitbach; Mary C Schroeder
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Can dedicated breast PET help to reduce overdiagnosis and overtreatment by differentiating between indolent and potentially aggressive ductal carcinoma in situ?

Authors:  Lucía Graña-López; Michel Herranz; Inés Domínguez-Prado; Sonia Argibay; Ángeles Villares; Manuel Vázquez-Caruncho
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Molecular Markers as Prognostic Factors in DCIS and Small Invasive Breast Cancers.

Authors:  N Sänger; K Engels; A Graf; E Ruckhäberle; K E Effenberger; T Fehm; U Holtrich; S Becker; T Karn
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.