Literature DB >> 26311475

A Coalescent Model for a Sweep of a Unique Standing Variant.

Jeremy J Berg1, Graham Coop2.   

Abstract

The use of genetic polymorphism data to understand the dynamics of adaptation and identify the loci that are involved has become a major pursuit of modern evolutionary genetics. In addition to the classical "hard sweep" hitchhiking model, recent research has drawn attention to the fact that the dynamics of adaptation can play out in a variety of different ways and that the specific signatures left behind in population genetic data may depend somewhat strongly on these dynamics. One particular model for which a large number of empirical examples are already known is that in which a single derived mutation arises and drifts to some low frequency before an environmental change causes the allele to become beneficial and sweeps to fixation. Here, we pursue an analytical investigation of this model, bolstered and extended via simulation study. We use coalescent theory to develop an analytical approximation for the effect of a sweep from standing variation on the genealogy at the locus of the selected allele and sites tightly linked to it. We show that the distribution of haplotypes that the selected allele is present on at the time of the environmental change can be approximated by considering recombinant haplotypes as alleles in the infinite-alleles model. We show that this approximation can be leveraged to make accurate predictions regarding patterns of genetic polymorphism following such a sweep. We then use simulations to highlight which sources of haplotypic information are likely to be most useful in distinguishing this model from neutrality, as well as from other sweep models, such as the classic hard sweep and multiple-mutation soft sweeps. We find that in general, adaptation from a unique standing variant will likely be difficult to detect on the basis of genetic polymorphism data from a single population time point alone, and when it can be detected, it will be difficult to distinguish from other varieties of selective sweeps. Samples from multiple populations and/or time points have the potential to ease this difficulty.
Copyright © 2015 by the Genetics Society of America.

Keywords:  coalescent theory; genetic hitchhiking; natural selection; soft sweep; standing variation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26311475      PMCID: PMC4596678          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.178962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  59 in total

1.  Haldane's sieve and adaptation from the standing genetic variation.

Authors:  H A Orr; A J Betancourt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  On the genealogy of a sample of neutral rare alleles.

Authors:  C Wiuf
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection.

Authors:  J C Fay; C I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Detecting recent positive selection in the human genome from haplotype structure.

Authors:  Pardis C Sabeti; David E Reich; John M Higgins; Haninah Z P Levine; Daniel J Richter; Stephen F Schaffner; Stacey B Gabriel; Jill V Platko; Nick J Patterson; Gavin J McDonald; Hans C Ackerman; Sarah J Campbell; David Altshuler; Richard Cooper; Dominic Kwiatkowski; Ryk Ward; Eric S Lander
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-10-09       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The extent of linkage disequilibrium and haplotype sharing around a polymorphic site.

Authors:  Hideki Innan; Magnus Nordborg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The frequency spectrum of a mutation, and its age, in a general diffusion model.

Authors:  R C Griffiths
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  Genetic trade-offs and conditional neutrality contribute to local adaptation.

Authors:  Jill T Anderson; Cheng-Ruei Lee; Catherine A Rushworth; Robert I Colautti; Thomas Mitchell-Olds
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Recurrent gene amplification and soft selective sweeps during evolution of multidrug resistance in malaria parasites.

Authors:  Shalini Nair; Denae Nash; Daniel Sudimack; Anchalee Jaidee; Marion Barends; Anne-Catrin Uhlemann; Sanjeev Krishna; François Nosten; Tim J C Anderson
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2006-11-23       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Mutations of acetylcholinesterase which confer insecticide resistance in Drosophila melanogaster populations.

Authors:  Philippe Menozzi; Ming An Shi; Andrée Lougarre; Zhen Hua Tang; Didier Fournier
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Successive increases in the resistance of Drosophila to viral infection through a transposon insertion followed by a Duplication.

Authors:  Michael M Magwire; Florian Bayer; Claire L Webster; Chuan Cao; Francis M Jiggins
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Population genomics perspectives on convergent adaptation.

Authors:  Kristin M Lee; Graham Coop
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Going global by adapting local: A review of recent human adaptation.

Authors:  Shaohua Fan; Matthew E B Hansen; Yancy Lo; Sarah A Tishkoff
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Repeated Selection of Alternatively Adapted Haplotypes Creates Sweeping Genomic Remodeling in Stickleback.

Authors:  Susan Bassham; Julian Catchen; Emily Lescak; Frank A von Hippel; William A Cresko
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Detection and Classification of Hard and Soft Sweeps from Unphased Genotypes by Multilocus Genotype Identity.

Authors:  Alexandre M Harris; Nandita R Garud; Michael DeGiorgio
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Shared Molecular Targets Confer Resistance over Short and Long Evolutionary Timescales.

Authors:  Jing Li; Ignacio Vázquez-García; Karl Persson; Asier González; Jia-Xing Yue; Benjamin Barré; Michael N Hall; Anthony Long; Jonas Warringer; Ville Mustonen; Gianni Liti
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 6.  Factors influencing the effect size distribution of adaptive substitutions.

Authors:  Emily L Dittmar; Christopher G Oakley; Jeffrey K Conner; Billie A Gould; Douglas W Schemske
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  How Good Are Predictions of the Effects of Selective Sweeps on Levels of Neutral Diversity?

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genetic Signatures of Evolutionary Rescue by a Selective Sweep.

Authors:  Matthew M Osmond; Graham Coop
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Distinguishing Among Modes of Convergent Adaptation Using Population Genomic Data.

Authors:  Kristin M Lee; Graham Coop
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The genomic landscape of rapid repeated evolutionary adaptation to toxic pollution in wild fish.

Authors:  Noah M Reid; Dina A Proestou; Bryan W Clark; Wesley C Warren; John K Colbourne; Joseph R Shaw; Sibel I Karchner; Mark E Hahn; Diane Nacci; Marjorie F Oleksiak; Douglas L Crawford; Andrew Whitehead
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.