Literature DB >> 30315068

Detection and Classification of Hard and Soft Sweeps from Unphased Genotypes by Multilocus Genotype Identity.

Alexandre M Harris1,2, Nandita R Garud3, Michael DeGiorgio4,5,6.   

Abstract

Positive natural selection can lead to a decrease in genomic diversity at the selected site and at linked sites, producing a characteristic signature of elevated expected haplotype homozygosity. These selective sweeps can be hard or soft. In the case of a hard selective sweep, a single adaptive haplotype rises to high population frequency, whereas multiple adaptive haplotypes sweep through the population simultaneously in a soft sweep, producing distinct patterns of genetic variation in the vicinity of the selected site. Measures of expected haplotype homozygosity have previously been used to detect sweeps in multiple study systems. However, these methods are formulated for phased haplotype data, typically unavailable for nonmodel organisms, and some may have reduced power to detect soft sweeps due to their increased genetic diversity relative to hard sweeps. To address these limitations, we applied the H12 and H2/H1 statistics proposed in 2015 by Garud et al., which have power to detect both hard and soft sweeps, to unphased multilocus genotypes, denoting them as G12 and G2/G1. G12 (and the more direct expected homozygosity analog to H12, denoted G123) has comparable power to H12 for detecting both hard and soft sweeps. G2/G1 can be used to classify hard and soft sweeps analogously to H2/H1, conditional on a genomic region having high G12 or G123 values. The reason for this power is that, under random mating, the most frequent haplotypes will yield the most frequent multilocus genotypes. Simulations based on parameters compatible with our recent understanding of human demographic history suggest that expected homozygosity methods are best suited for detecting recent sweeps, and increase in power under recent population expansions. Finally, we find candidates for selective sweeps within the 1000 Genomes CEU, YRI, GIH, and CHB populations, which corroborate and complement existing studies.
Copyright © 2018 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  expected haplotype homozygosity; hard sweep; multilocus genotype; positive selection; soft sweep

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30315068      PMCID: PMC6283157          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.118.301502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  122 in total

1.  Detecting a local signature of genetic hitchhiking along a recombining chromosome.

Authors:  Yuseob Kim; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model of genetic variation.

Authors:  Richard R Hudson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  The signature of positive selection at randomly chosen loci.

Authors:  Molly Przeworski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Estimate of the mutation rate per nucleotide in humans.

Authors:  M W Nachman; S L Crowell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  Detecting recent positive selection in the human genome from haplotype structure.

Authors:  Pardis C Sabeti; David E Reich; John M Higgins; Haninah Z P Levine; Daniel J Richter; Stephen F Schaffner; Stacey B Gabriel; Jill V Platko; Nick J Patterson; Gavin J McDonald; Hans C Ackerman; Sarah J Campbell; David Altshuler; Richard Cooper; Dominic Kwiatkowski; Ryk Ward; Eric S Lander
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-10-09       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Genetic signatures of strong recent positive selection at the lactase gene.

Authors:  Todd Bersaglieri; Pardis C Sabeti; Nick Patterson; Trisha Vanderploeg; Steve F Schaffner; Jared A Drake; Matthew Rhodes; David E Reich; Joel N Hirschhorn
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-04-26       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Microsatellite variation and recombination rate in the human genome.

Authors:  B A Payseur; M W Nachman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Relationship of race to sudden cardiac death in competitive athletes with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Barry J Maron; Kevin P Carney; Harry M Lever; Jannet F Lewis; Ivan Barac; Susan A Casey; Mark V Sherrid
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-03-19       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  Untranslated regions of mRNAs.

Authors:  Flavio Mignone; Carmela Gissi; Sabino Liuni; Graziano Pesole
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  17 in total

1.  Identifying and Classifying Shared Selective Sweeps from Multilocus Data.

Authors:  Alexandre M Harris; Michael DeGiorgio
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genomic diversity and post-admixture adaptation in the Uyghurs.

Authors:  Yuwen Pan; Chao Zhang; Yan Lu; Zhilin Ning; Dongsheng Lu; Yang Gao; Xiaohan Zhao; Yajun Yang; Yaqun Guan; Dolikun Mamatyusupu; Shuhua Xu
Journal:  Natl Sci Rev       Date:  2021-09-11       Impact factor: 17.275

3.  Learning the properties of adaptive regions with functional data analysis.

Authors:  Mehreen R Mughal; Hillary Koch; Jinguo Huang; Francesca Chiaromonte; Michael DeGiorgio
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 5.917

4.  Localizing and Classifying Adaptive Targets with Trend Filtered Regression.

Authors:  Mehreen R Mughal; Michael DeGiorgio
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Comparative and population genomics approaches reveal the basis of adaptation to deserts in a small rodent.

Authors:  Anna Tigano; Jocelyn P Colella; Matthew D MacManes
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 6.  The population genomics of adaptive loss of function.

Authors:  J Grey Monroe; John K McKay; Detlef Weigel; Pádraic J Flood
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Detection of hard and soft selective sweeps from Drosophila melanogaster population genomic data.

Authors:  Nandita R Garud; Philipp W Messer; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 8.  Genetics and Genomics of African Rice (Oryza glaberrima Steud) Domestication.

Authors:  Peterson W Wambugu; Marie-Noelle Ndjiondjop; Robert Henry
Journal:  Rice (N Y)       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.783

9.  Selective Sweeps Under Dominance and Inbreeding.

Authors:  Matthew Hartfield; Thomas Bataillon
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  A Likelihood Approach for Uncovering Selective Sweep Signatures from Haplotype Data.

Authors:  Alexandre M Harris; Michael DeGiorgio
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.