| Literature DB >> 26301504 |
Wenkai Xiao1, Ping Ye1, Ruihua Cao1, Xu Yang1, Yongyi Bai1, Hongmei Wu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Urine albumin excretion is an important predictor of adverse cardiovascular events. Minimally elevated levels of serum cardiac troponin T (cTnT), a marker of cardiomyocyte micronecrosis, can be detected with high sensitivity cTnT (hs-cTnT) assays. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between alterations in albuminuria and serum hs-cTnT levels in a community-based population.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26301504 PMCID: PMC4547701 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135747
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Relationship between UACR and the presence of elevated hs-cTnT.
| Elevated hs-cTnT | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Odds ratios | 95% CI | P-value | |
| Unadjusted | 1.67 | 1.44–1.94 | <0.001 |
| Model 1 | 1.55 | 1.31–1.84 | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.42 | 1.18–1.72 | <0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1.40 | 1.08–1.65 | 0.002 |
Data are presented as odds ratios (per SD increase in the natural logarithm of the urinary albumin to creatinine ratio level) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Hs-cTnT levels ≥14 pg/mL were considered as elevated hs-cTnT. Model 1 = adjusted for age and sex. Model 2 = model 1 plus hypertension; diabetes mellitus; current smoking; body mass index; systolic and diastolic blood pressures; and levels of plasma triglyceride, low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, fasting blood glucose, 2-h postprandial blood glucose, homocysteine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Model 3 = model 2 plus use of (used = 1; unused = 0) angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, β-blockers, antiplatelet drug, statins.
Relationship between UACR and elevated hs-cTnT risk across quartiles.
| UACR (mg/g) | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <7.24 | 7.24–11.68 | 11.69–22.40 | >22.40 | |
| Univariable model | ||||
| Odds ratio | 1.00 | 1.337 | 1.615 | 4.205 |
| 95% CI | Reference | 0.683–2.617 | 0.844–3.093 | 2.351–7.520 |
| P | 0.397 | 0.148 | <0.001 | |
| Multivariable model 1 | ||||
| Odds ratio | 1.00 | 1.364 | 1.547 | 3.279 |
| 95% CI | Reference | 0.667–2.788 | 0.773–3.096 | 1.743–6.169 |
| P | 0.395 | 0.218 | <0.001 | |
| Multivariable model 2 | ||||
| Odds ratio | 1.00 | 1.268 | 1.329 | 2.615 |
| 95% CI | Reference | 0.593–2.713 | 0.636–2.780 | 1.315–5.200 |
| P | 0.540 | 0.449 | <0.001 | |
| Multivariable model 3 | ||||
| Odds ratio | 1.00 | 1.114 | 1.205 | 2.432 |
| 95% CI | Reference | 0.571–2.534 | 0.615–2.577 | 1.254–5.083 |
| P | 0.612 | 0.480 | 0.006 |
The quartile 1 level of UACR was used as the reference. Regression models were adjusted for Models 1, 2 and 3 (the same as described in Table 1).