BACKGROUND: We report the development of a novel high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) assay, a modification of the Roche fourth-generation cTnT assay, and validation of the analytical performance of this assay. METHODS: Validation included testing of analytical sensitivity, specificity, interferences, and precision. We established the 99th percentile cutoff from healthy reference populations (n = 616). In addition, we studied differences in time to a positive result when using serial measurements of hs-cTnT vs cTnT in patients with a confirmed diagnosis of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI). RESULTS: The hs-cTnT assay had an analytical range from 3 to 10 000 ng/L. At the 99th percentile value of 13.5 ng/L, the CV was 9% using the Elecsys 2010 analyzer. The assay was specific for cTnT without interferences from human cTnI or cTnC, skeletal muscle TnT, or hemoglobin concentrations up to 1000 mg/L, above which falsely lower values would be expected. When the assay was evaluated clinically, a hs-cTnT higher than the 99th percentile concentration identified a significantly higher number of patients with non-STEMI on presentation (45 vs 20 patients, P = 0.0004) compared with cTnT, and a final diagnosis of non-STEMI was made in 9 additional patients (55 vs 46 patients, P = 0.23) after serial sampling. Time to diagnosis was significantly shorter using hs-cTnT compared with cTnT [mean 71.5 (SD 108.7) min vs 246.9 (82.0) min, respectively; P < 0.01]. CONCLUSIONS: The analytical performance of hs-cTnT complies with the ESC-ACCF-AHA-WHF Global Task Force recommendations for use in the diagnosis of MI.
BACKGROUND: We report the development of a novel high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) assay, a modification of the Roche fourth-generation cTnT assay, and validation of the analytical performance of this assay. METHODS: Validation included testing of analytical sensitivity, specificity, interferences, and precision. We established the 99th percentile cutoff from healthy reference populations (n = 616). In addition, we studied differences in time to a positive result when using serial measurements of hs-cTnT vs cTnT in patients with a confirmed diagnosis of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI). RESULTS: The hs-cTnT assay had an analytical range from 3 to 10 000 ng/L. At the 99th percentile value of 13.5 ng/L, the CV was 9% using the Elecsys 2010 analyzer. The assay was specific for cTnT without interferences from humancTnI or cTnC, skeletal muscle TnT, or hemoglobin concentrations up to 1000 mg/L, above which falsely lower values would be expected. When the assay was evaluated clinically, a hs-cTnT higher than the 99th percentile concentration identified a significantly higher number of patients with non-STEMI on presentation (45 vs 20 patients, P = 0.0004) compared with cTnT, and a final diagnosis of non-STEMI was made in 9 additional patients (55 vs 46 patients, P = 0.23) after serial sampling. Time to diagnosis was significantly shorter using hs-cTnT compared with cTnT [mean 71.5 (SD 108.7) min vs 246.9 (82.0) min, respectively; P < 0.01]. CONCLUSIONS: The analytical performance of hs-cTnT complies with the ESC-ACCF-AHA-WHF Global Task Force recommendations for use in the diagnosis of MI.
Authors: Brendan M Everett; Nancy R Cook; Maria C Magnone; Maria Bobadilla; Eunjung Kim; Nader Rifai; Paul M Ridker; Aruna D Pradhan Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-05-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Christopher R deFilippi; James A de Lemos; Robert H Christenson; John S Gottdiener; Willem J Kop; Min Zhan; Stephen L Seliger Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-11-15 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: John W McEvoy; Yuan Chen; Chiadi E Ndumele; Scott D Solomon; Vijay Nambi; Christie M Ballantyne; Roger S Blumenthal; Josef Coresh; Elizabeth Selvin Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Andrea L C Schneider; Andreea M Rawlings; A Richey Sharrett; Alvaro Alonso; Thomas H Mosley; Ron C Hoogeveen; Christie M Ballantyne; Rebecca F Gottesman; Elizabeth Selvin Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2014-03-30 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Waleed Ahmed; Christopher L Schlett; Shanmugam Uthamalingam; Quynh A Truong; Wolfgang Koenig; Ian S Rogers; Ron Blankstein; John T Nagurney; Ahmed Tawakol; James L Januzzi; Udo Hoffmann Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-01
Authors: Emmanuel Chorianopoulos; Ulrike Krumsdorf; Nicolas Geis; Sven T Pleger; Evangelos Giannitsis; Hugo A Katus; Raffi Bekeredjian Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2013-10-06 Impact factor: 5.460