Literature DB >> 21617108

Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus.

David B Sacks1, Mark Arnold, George L Bakris, David E Bruns, Andrea Rita Horvath, M Sue Kirkman, Ake Lernmark, Boyd E Metzger, David M Nathan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multiple laboratory tests are used to diagnose and manage patients with diabetes mellitus. The quality of the scientific evidence supporting the use of these tests varies substantially. APPROACH: An expert committee compiled evidence-based recommendations for the use of laboratory testing for patients with diabetes. A new system was developed to grade the overall quality of the evidence and the strength of the recommendations. Draft guidelines were posted on the Internet and presented at the 2007 Arnold O. Beckman Conference. The document was modified in response to oral and written comments, and a revised draft was posted in 2010 and again modified in response to written comments. The National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry and the Evidence-Based Laboratory Medicine Committee of the American Association for Clinical Chemistry jointly reviewed the guidelines, which were accepted after revisions by the Professional Practice Committee and subsequently approved by the Executive Committee of the American Diabetes Association. CONTENT: In addition to long-standing criteria based on measurement of plasma glucose, diabetes can be diagnosed by demonstrating increased blood hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) concentrations. Monitoring of glycemic control is performed by self-monitoring of plasma or blood glucose with meters and by laboratory analysis of HbA(1c). The potential roles of noninvasive glucose monitoring, genetic testing, and measurement of autoantibodies, urine albumin, insulin, proinsulin, C-peptide, and other analytes are addressed.
SUMMARY: The guidelines provide specific recommendations that are based on published data or derived from expert consensus. Several analytes have minimal clinical value at present, and their measurement is not recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21617108      PMCID: PMC3114322          DOI: 10.2337/dc11-9998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  348 in total

1.  Estimate of biological variation of laboratory analytes based on the third national health and nutrition examination survey.

Authors:  David A Lacher; Jeffery P Hughes; Margaret D Carroll
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 2.  Assessing the quality of glucose monitor studies: a critical evaluation of published reports.

Authors:  John Mahoney; John Ellison
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Use of alternative thresholds defining insulin resistance to predict incident type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Martin K Rutter; Peter W F Wilson; Lisa M Sullivan; Caroline S Fox; Ralph B D'Agostino; James B Meigs
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Diabetes in Asia: epidemiology, risk factors, and pathophysiology.

Authors:  Juliana C N Chan; Vasanti Malik; Weiping Jia; Takashi Kadowaki; Chittaranjan S Yajnik; Kun-Ho Yoon; Frank B Hu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Effectiveness of sodium fluoride as a preservative of glucose in blood.

Authors:  A Y Chan; R Swaminathan; C S Cockram
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  Undiagnosed NIDDM: clinical and public health issues.

Authors:  M I Harris
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Two capillary blood-collection techniques for estimating glycohemoglobin compared.

Authors:  S K Baglin; A S Brown
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  Feasibility of centralized measurements of glycated hemoglobin in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial: a multicenter study. The DCCT Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Within- and between-subject variation in commonly measured anthropometric and biochemical variables.

Authors:  A Widjaja; R J Morris; J C Levy; K N Frayn; S E Manley; R C Turner
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  Contributions of weekly mean blood glucose values to hemoglobin A1c in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: the Diabetes Outcomes in Veterans Study (DOVES).

Authors:  Glen H Murata; Richard M Hoffman; William C Duckworth; Christopher S Wendel; Jayendra H Shah
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.378

View more
  130 in total

1.  Systematic Evaluation of Genes and Genetic Variants Associated with Type 1 Diabetes Susceptibility.

Authors:  Ramesh Ram; Munish Mehta; Quang T Nguyen; Irma Larma; Bernhard O Boehm; Flemming Pociot; Patrick Concannon; Grant Morahan
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  Noncommunicable diseases among HIV-infected persons in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pragna Patel; Charles E Rose; Pamela Y Collins; Bernardo Nuche-Berenguer; Vikrant V Sahasrabuddhe; Emmanuel Peprah; Susan Vorkoper; Sonak D Pastakia; Dianne Rausch; Naomi S Levitt
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 3.  Role of health information technologies in the Patient-centered Medical Home.

Authors:  Jennifer L Kraschnewski; Robert A Gabbay
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-01

Review 4.  Approach to hypoglycemia in infants and children.

Authors:  Kajal Gandhi
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2017-10

5.  Analysis: New point-of-care blood glucose monitoring system for the hospital demonstrates satisfactory analytical accuracy using blood from critically ill patients--an important step toward improved blood glucose control in the hospital.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Joseph
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-01

6.  Understanding Patient Information Needs About Their Clinical Laboratory Results: A Study of Social Q&A Site.

Authors:  Zhan Zhang; Yu Lu; Yubo Kou; Danny T Y Wu; Jina Huh-Yoo; Zhe He
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2019-08-21

7.  Evaluation of Nova StatStrip and FreeStyle Precision Pro blood ketone tests using 3-hydroxybutyrate doped samples.

Authors:  Johanna Helmersson-Karlqvist; Kristina Höög Hammarström; Kicki Palmberg; Carolina Backman-Johansson
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 2.352

8.  Analytical evaluation of the ADAMS A1c HA8180T analyzer for the measurement of HbA1c.

Authors:  Eloísa Urrechaga
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 2.352

9.  Application of a near-infrared laser tweezers Raman spectroscopy system for label-free analysis and differentiation of diabetic red blood cells.

Authors:  Jinyong Lin; Lingdong Shao; Sufang Qiu; Xingwu Huang; Mengmeng Liu; Zuci Zheng; Duo Lin; Yongliang Xu; Zhihua Li; Yao Lin; Rong Chen; Shangyuan Feng
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  Alarming increase in HbA1c and near misdiagnosis of diabetes mellitus resulting from a clinical laboratory instrument upgrade and haemoglobin variant.

Authors:  Steven D Chessler; Donald E Lee
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-06-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.