BACKGROUND: Substantial controversy surrounds the use of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and albuminuria to define chronic kidney disease and assign its stages. We undertook a meta-analysis to assess the independent and combined associations of eGFR and albuminuria with mortality. METHODS: In this collaborative meta-analysis of general population cohorts, we pooled standardised data for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality from studies containing at least 1000 participants and baseline information about eGFR and urine albumin concentrations. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality associated with eGFR and albuminuria, adjusted for potential confounders. FINDINGS: The analysis included 105,872 participants (730,577 person-years) from 14 studies with urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) measurements and 1,128,310 participants (4,732,110 person-years) from seven studies with urine protein dipstick measurements. In studies with ACR measurements, risk of mortality was unrelated to eGFR between 75 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and 105 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and increased at lower eGFRs. Compared with eGFR 95 mL/min/1.73 m(2), adjusted HRs for all-cause mortality were 1.18 (95% CI 1.05-1.32) for eGFR 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), 1.57 (1.39-1.78) for 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2), and 3.14 (2.39-4.13) for 15 mL/min/1.73 m(2). ACR was associated with risk of mortality linearly on the log-log scale without threshold effects. Compared with ACR 0.6 mg/mmol, adjusted HRs for all-cause mortality were 1.20 (1.15-1.26) for ACR 1.1 mg/mmol, 1.63 (1.50-1.77) for 3.4 mg/mmol, and 2.22 (1.97-2.51) for 33.9 mg/mmol. eGFR and ACR were multiplicatively associated with risk of mortality without evidence of interaction. Similar findings were recorded for cardiovascular mortality and in studies with dipstick measurements. INTERPRETATION: eGFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and ACR 1.1 mg/mmol (10 mg/g) or more are independent predictors of mortality risk in the general population. This study provides quantitative data for use of both kidney measures for risk assessment and definition and staging of chronic kidney disease. FUNDING: Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO), US National Kidney Foundation, and Dutch Kidney Foundation. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Substantial controversy surrounds the use of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and albuminuria to define chronic kidney disease and assign its stages. We undertook a meta-analysis to assess the independent and combined associations of eGFR and albuminuria with mortality. METHODS: In this collaborative meta-analysis of general population cohorts, we pooled standardised data for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality from studies containing at least 1000 participants and baseline information about eGFR and urine albumin concentrations. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality associated with eGFR and albuminuria, adjusted for potential confounders. FINDINGS: The analysis included 105,872 participants (730,577 person-years) from 14 studies with urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) measurements and 1,128,310 participants (4,732,110 person-years) from seven studies with urine protein dipstick measurements. In studies with ACR measurements, risk of mortality was unrelated to eGFR between 75 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and 105 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and increased at lower eGFRs. Compared with eGFR 95 mL/min/1.73 m(2), adjusted HRs for all-cause mortality were 1.18 (95% CI 1.05-1.32) for eGFR 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), 1.57 (1.39-1.78) for 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2), and 3.14 (2.39-4.13) for 15 mL/min/1.73 m(2). ACR was associated with risk of mortality linearly on the log-log scale without threshold effects. Compared with ACR 0.6 mg/mmol, adjusted HRs for all-cause mortality were 1.20 (1.15-1.26) for ACR 1.1 mg/mmol, 1.63 (1.50-1.77) for 3.4 mg/mmol, and 2.22 (1.97-2.51) for 33.9 mg/mmol. eGFR and ACR were multiplicatively associated with risk of mortality without evidence of interaction. Similar findings were recorded for cardiovascular mortality and in studies with dipstick measurements. INTERPRETATION: eGFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and ACR 1.1 mg/mmol (10 mg/g) or more are independent predictors of mortality risk in the general population. This study provides quantitative data for use of both kidney measures for risk assessment and definition and staging of chronic kidney disease. FUNDING: Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO), US National Kidney Foundation, and Dutch Kidney Foundation. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Lesley A Stevens; Josef Coresh; Christopher H Schmid; Harold I Feldman; Marc Froissart; John Kusek; Jerome Rossert; Frederick Van Lente; Robert D Bruce; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Tom Greene; Andrew S Levey Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Chi Pang Wen; Ting Yuan David Cheng; Min Kuang Tsai; Yen Chen Chang; Hui Ting Chan; Shan Pou Tsai; Po Huang Chiang; Chih Cheng Hsu; Pei Kun Sung; Yi Hua Hsu; Sung Feng Wen Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-06-28 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Andrew S Levey; Lesley A Stevens; Christopher H Schmid; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Alejandro F Castro; Harold I Feldman; John W Kusek; Paul Eggers; Frederick Van Lente; Tom Greene; Josef Coresh Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: W Greg Miller; David E Bruns; Glen L Hortin; Sverre Sandberg; Kristin M Aakre; Matthew J McQueen; Yoshihisa Itoh; John C Lieske; David W Seccombe; Graham Jones; David M Bunk; Gary C Curhan; Andrew S Narva Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2008-11-21 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Adrienne S Allen; John P Forman; E John Orav; David W Bates; Bradley M Denker; Thomas D Sequist Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-10-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Lisandro D Colantonio; Usman Baber; Maciej Banach; Rikki M Tanner; David G Warnock; Orlando M Gutiérrez; Monika M Safford; Christoph Wanner; George Howard; Paul Muntner Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Shani Shastri; Hocine Tighiouart; Ronit Katz; Dena E Rifkin; Linda F Fried; Michael G Shlipak; Anne B Newman; Mark J Sarnak Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-04-21 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Daniel E Weiner; Meyeon Park; Hocine Tighiouart; Alin A Joseph; Myra A Carpenter; Nitender Goyal; Andrew A House; Chi-Yuan Hsu; Joachim H Ix; Paul F Jacques; Clifton E Kew; S Joseph Kim; John W Kusek; Todd E Pesavento; Marc A Pfeffer; Stephen R Smith; Matthew R Weir; Andrew S Levey; Andrew G Bostom Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Benjamin M Scirica; Ofri Mosenzon; Deepak L Bhatt; Jacob A Udell; Ph Gabriel Steg; Darren K McGuire; KyungAh Im; Estella Kanevsky; Christina Stahre; Mikaela Sjöstrand; Itamar Raz; Eugene Braunwald Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Dominik Steubl; Markus P Schneider; Heike Meiselbach; Jennifer Nadal; Matthias C Schmid; Turgay Saritas; Vera Krane; Claudia Sommerer; Seema Baid-Agrawal; Jakob Voelkl; Fruzsina Kotsis; Anna Köttgen; Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Jürgen E Scherberich Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2020-04-14 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Ankur Jindal; Mariana Garcia-Touza; Nidhi Jindal; Adam Whaley-Connell; James R Sowers Journal: Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 4.741