AIMS: It has been suggested that troponins and natriuretic peptides can be falsely elevated in subjects with impaired kidney function because of decreased renal clearance. The value of these biomarkers in subjects with impaired kidney function has therefore been debated. We tested in a population-based cohort study, first, whether high-sensitive troponin T (hsTnT) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) levels are cross-sectionally associated with the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and albuminuria, and secondly, whether these markers are associated with cardiovascular outcome, independent of eGFR, albuminuria and conventional cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 8121 subjects from the PREVEND study with both values of hsTnT and NT-pro-BNP available. High-sensitive troponin T >0.01 µg/L and NT-pro-BNP >125 ng/L were defined as elevated. We first performed linear regression analyses with hsTnT and NT-pro-BNP as dependent variables. Next, we performed Cox-regression analyses, studying the associations of hsTnT and NT-pro-BNP with incident cardiovascular events. Of our cohort, 6.7% had an elevated hsTnT and 12.2% an elevated NT-pro-BNP. Also, the estimated glomerular filtration rate, albuminuria, and ECG-assessed ischaemia and left ventricular hypertrophy were all significantly associated with hsTnT and NT-pro-BNP in the linear regression analyses. Both hsTnT and NT-pro-BNP appeared associated with cardiovascular events, and these associations remained significant after adjustment for eGFR, albuminuria, age, gender and conventional cardiovascular risk factors (P= 0.03 and P< 0.001, respectively). Only a few subjects with markedly reduced renal function were included. The results presented are therefore mainly valid for a population with mildly impaired renal function. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that a finding of an increased hsTnT or NT-pro-BNP in subjects with chronic kidney disease stages 1/3 should be taken seriously as a prognostic marker for a worse cardiovascular outcome and not be discarded as merely a reflection of decreased renal clearance.
AIMS: It has been suggested that troponins and natriuretic peptides can be falsely elevated in subjects with impaired kidney function because of decreased renal clearance. The value of these biomarkers in subjects with impaired kidney function has therefore been debated. We tested in a population-based cohort study, first, whether high-sensitive troponin T (hsTnT) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) levels are cross-sectionally associated with the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and albuminuria, and secondly, whether these markers are associated with cardiovascular outcome, independent of eGFR, albuminuria and conventional cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 8121 subjects from the PREVEND study with both values of hsTnT and NT-pro-BNP available. High-sensitive troponin T >0.01 µg/L and NT-pro-BNP >125 ng/L were defined as elevated. We first performed linear regression analyses with hsTnT and NT-pro-BNP as dependent variables. Next, we performed Cox-regression analyses, studying the associations of hsTnT and NT-pro-BNP with incident cardiovascular events. Of our cohort, 6.7% had an elevated hsTnT and 12.2% an elevated NT-pro-BNP. Also, the estimated glomerular filtration rate, albuminuria, and ECG-assessed ischaemia and left ventricular hypertrophy were all significantly associated with hsTnT and NT-pro-BNP in the linear regression analyses. Both hsTnT and NT-pro-BNP appeared associated with cardiovascular events, and these associations remained significant after adjustment for eGFR, albuminuria, age, gender and conventional cardiovascular risk factors (P= 0.03 and P< 0.001, respectively). Only a few subjects with markedly reduced renal function were included. The results presented are therefore mainly valid for a population with mildly impaired renal function. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that a finding of an increased hsTnT or NT-pro-BNP in subjects with chronic kidney disease stages 1/3 should be taken seriously as a prognostic marker for a worse cardiovascular outcome and not be discarded as merely a reflection of decreased renal clearance.
Authors: Mary Cushman; Suzanne E Judd; Virginia J Howard; Brett Kissela; Orlando M Gutiérrez; Nancy S Jenny; Ali Ahmed; Evan L Thacker; Neil A Zakai Journal: Stroke Date: 2014-04-22 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Sahera Dirajlal-Fargo; Bruce Kinley; Ying Jiang; Chris T Longenecker; Corrilynn O Hileman; Sara Debanne; Grace A McComsey Journal: AIDS Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Nisha Bansal; Amanda Hyre Anderson; Wei Yang; Robert H Christenson; Christopher R deFilippi; Rajat Deo; Daniel L Dries; Alan S Go; Jiang He; John W Kusek; James P Lash; Dominic Raj; Sylvia Rosas; Myles Wolf; Xiaoming Zhang; Michael G Shlipak; Harold I Feldman Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-10-02 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Ian J Neeland; Mark H Drazner; Jarett D Berry; Colby R Ayers; Christopher deFilippi; Stephen L Seliger; Vijay Nambi; Darren K McGuire; Torbjørn Omland; James A de Lemos Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-12-05 Impact factor: 24.094