Literature DB >> 26286756

Effect on contrast sensitivity after clear, yellow and orange intraocular lens implantation.

Sabyasachi Bandyopadhyay1,2, Mita Saha3, Asim Chakrabarti3, Abhik Sinha4.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate contrast sensitivity function (CSF) after clear, yellow- and orange-tinted intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. This was a prospective randomized study of 98 patients with senile cataract for a period of 6 months from day 1 of August 2014 to day 31 of January 2015. After phacoemulsification, 33 patients were implanted with clear IOLs (AcrySof UV-filtering IOL, SA60AT), 32 patients were implanted with yellow coloured IOLs (AcrySof Natural blue-light-attenuating and UV-filtering IOL, SN60AT with IMPRUV(®) filter) and 33 patients were implanted with orange-tinted blue-filtering IOLs (PC440Y Optech). After 1 month, monocular CSF was done under photopic (85 cd/m(2)) and mesopic (3 cd/m(2)) illumination condition with CSV-1000 test. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after 1 month was 0.021 ± 0.058 logMAR for clear lens, 0.022 ± 0.059 logMAR for yellow lens and 0.019 ± 0.065 logMAR for orange lens (p = 0.989). Uniocular average photopic contrast sensitivity was 1.36 ± 0.19, 1.43 ± 0.18 and 1.46 ± 0.15 log units for clear lens, yellow lens and orange lens, respectively (statistically not significant; p = 0.076). Average mesopic contrast sensitivity was 1.02 ± 0.21 log units for clear lens, 1.00 ± 0.17 log units for yellow lens and 0.99 ± 0.15 log units for orange lens (statistically not significant; p = 0.771). Yellow or orange coloured blue-filtering IOLs are comparable to clear IOLs in terms of photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contrast sensitivity; Filter; Orange; Ultraviolet ray; Yellow

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26286756     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-015-0120-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  21 in total

1.  Blue-light filtering intraocular lens in patients with diabetes: contrast sensitivity and chromatic discrimination.

Authors:  Antonio Rodríguez-Galietero; Robert Montés-Micó; Gonzalo Muñoz; Cesar Albarrán-Diego
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Effects of blue light-filtering intraocular lenses on the macula, contrast sensitivity, and color vision after a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Newton Kara-Junior; Rodrigo F Espindola; Beatriz A F Gomes; Bruna Ventura; David Smadja; Marcony R Santhiago
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Comparison of visual performance with blue light-filtering and ultraviolet light-filtering intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Beatrix Neumaier-Ammerer; Stefan Felke; Stefan Hagen; Paulina Haas; Florian Zeiler; Harald Mauler; Susanne Binder
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Comparison of photochromic, yellow, and clear intraocular lenses in human eyes under photopic and mesopic lighting conditions.

Authors:  Haiwei Wang; Jun Wang; Wenying Fan; Wenying Wang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  The lipofuscin fluorophore A2E mediates blue light-induced damage to retinal pigmented epithelial cells.

Authors:  J R Sparrow; K Nakanishi; C A Parish
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Violet and blue light blocking intraocular lenses: photoprotection versus photoreception.

Authors:  M A Mainster
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Sunlight exposure, antioxidants, and age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Astrid E Fletcher; Graham C Bentham; Maureen Agnew; Ian S Young; Cristina Augood; Usha Chakravarthy; Paulus T V M de Jong; Mati Rahu; Johan Seland; Gisele Soubrane; Laura Tomazzoli; Fotis Topouzis; Johannes R Vingerling; Jesus Vioque
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-10

8.  Intraindividual comparison of a blue-light filter on visual function: AF-1 (UY) versus AF-1 (UV) intraocular lens.

Authors:  Ulrich Mester; Frank Holz; Thomas Kohnen; Chris Lohmann; Manfred Tetz
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  AcrySof Natural SN60AT versus AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lens in patients with color vision defects.

Authors:  Shetal M Raj; Abhay R Vasavada; Mayank A Nanavaty
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  Effect of the color of the intraocular lens on optical and visual quality.

Authors:  M Amparo DIez-Ajenjo; M Carmen GarcIa-Domene; Cristina Peris-MartInez; Jos M Artigas; Adelina Felipe
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.848

View more
  5 in total

1.  Role of short-wavelength filtering lenses in delaying myopia progression and amelioration of asthenopia in juveniles.

Authors:  Hai-Lan Zhao; Jin Jiang; Jie Yu; Hai-Ming Xu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 2.  Ultraviolet or blue-filtering intraocular lenses: what is the evidence?

Authors:  S M Downes
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 3.  Blue-light filtering intraocular lenses (IOLs) for protecting macular health.

Authors:  Laura E Downie; Ljoudmila Busija; Peter R Keller
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-22

Review 4.  The evidence informing the surgeon's selection of intraocular lens on the basis of light transmittance properties.

Authors:  X Li; D Kelly; J M Nolan; J L Dennison; S Beatty
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Association of Blue Light-Filtering Intraocular Lenses With All-Cause and Traffic Accident-Related Injuries Among Patients Undergoing Bilateral Cataract Surgery in Finland.

Authors:  Piotr Kanclerz; Idan Hecht; Mariana Cunha; Boris Knyazer; Ilkka Laine; Raimo Tuuminen
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-08-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.