PURPOSE: To evaluate potential changes in contrast sensitivity and color discrimination in diabetic patients who had cataract surgery and implantation of the blue-light filtering AcrySof Natural (SN60AT) intraocular lens (IOL) compared with an ultraviolet-only filtering (AcrySof SA60AT) IOL. SETTING: Refractive Surgery Unit, Hospital NISA Valencia al Mar, Valencia, Spain. METHODS: Forty-four eyes of 22 diabetic patients were enrolled in a blue-light filtering fellow-eye control study. Patients received yellow-tinted IOLs (AcrySof Natural) in 1 eye and non-yellow-tinted IOLs (AcrySof SA60AT) in the fellow eye. Three months after surgery, monocular contrast sensitivity function was measured with the CSV 1000-E contrast sensitivity chart at distance and color discrimination was tested with the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-hue test. RESULTS: Eyes implanted with the blue-light filtering IOLs showed better contrast sensitivity values than fellow eyes implanted with non-yellow-tinted IOLs (P<.05). The blue-light filtering IOL did not modify chromatic discrimination compared with the non-yellow-tinted IOL (P = .62). In the blue-yellow axis discrimination study, the eyes implanted with the AcrySof Natural IOL had statistically significant better color vision (P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: In diabetic patients, the AcrySof Natural IOL provides better contrast sensitivity than the AcrySof SA60AT. The blue-light filter of the AcrySof Natural IOL did not cause chromatic discrimination defects based on total error scores and improved color vision in the blue-yellow chromatic axis in diabetic patients.
PURPOSE: To evaluate potential changes in contrast sensitivity and color discrimination in diabeticpatients who had cataract surgery and implantation of the blue-light filtering AcrySof Natural (SN60AT) intraocular lens (IOL) compared with an ultraviolet-only filtering (AcrySof SA60AT) IOL. SETTING: Refractive Surgery Unit, Hospital NISA Valencia al Mar, Valencia, Spain. METHODS: Forty-four eyes of 22 diabeticpatients were enrolled in a blue-light filtering fellow-eye control study. Patients received yellow-tinted IOLs (AcrySof Natural) in 1 eye and non-yellow-tinted IOLs (AcrySof SA60AT) in the fellow eye. Three months after surgery, monocular contrast sensitivity function was measured with the CSV 1000-E contrast sensitivity chart at distance and color discrimination was tested with the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-hue test. RESULTS: Eyes implanted with the blue-light filtering IOLs showed better contrast sensitivity values than fellow eyes implanted with non-yellow-tinted IOLs (P<.05). The blue-light filtering IOL did not modify chromatic discrimination compared with the non-yellow-tinted IOL (P = .62). In the blue-yellow axis discrimination study, the eyes implanted with the AcrySof Natural IOL had statistically significant better color vision (P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: In diabeticpatients, the AcrySof Natural IOL provides better contrast sensitivity than the AcrySof SA60AT. The blue-light filter of the AcrySof Natural IOL did not cause chromatic discrimination defects based on total error scores and improved color vision in the blue-yellow chromatic axis in diabeticpatients.
Authors: James A Davison; Anil S Patel; Joao P Cunha; Jim Schwiegerling; Orkun Muftuoglu Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2011-05-17 Impact factor: 3.117