Literature DB >> 26282230

Evaluation of a simplified hip structure analysis method for the prediction of incident hip fracture events.

B C C Khoo1,2,3, J R Lewis4,5, K Brown6, R L Prince4,5.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Many attempts have been made to improve the predictive ability of areal bone mineral density (aBMD) which integrates bone mass and area. The addition of an extra variable derived from the hip dual-energy X-ray (DXA) image TR_σ, which describes distribution of mass within the scanned area of the trochanter, improved prediction of 15-year hip fracture probability in elderly women.
INTRODUCTION: Two-dimensional DXA imaging of the proximal femur to produce an aBMD is a clinically useful predictor of future fracture risk. Further analysis of the DXA image to produce an eight-variable hip structure analysis (Beck HSA) has been developed to improve understanding of structural factors determining hip bone strength at each of three proximal femur sites, the narrow femoral neck (NN), intertrochanter (TR) and shaft (S). Recently, data on four measurements derived from the currently used eight Beck HSA variables were used to capture population variation in bone structure at each site. These include two previously used variables, the localised aBMD and the sub-periosteal width (W) applying to 5-mm sections (at each sites), and two new variables, standard deviation of normalised mineral-mass projection profile distribution (σ), and displacement between centre-of-mineral mass and geometric centre-of-mineral mass of projection profile (δ).
METHODS: Using a cohort of 1159 women, mean baseline age 75, who sustained 139 hip fractures over 15 years, we determined whether these measures significantly improved 15-year hip fracture prediction compared to current approach utilising age and total hip aBMD. To describe the most parsimonious model for hip fracture risk prediction, the 12 base measures (4 from each site), total hip aBMD and age were evaluated in stepwise logistic regression models.
RESULTS: The final model included TR_σ, total hip aBMD and age and provided improved utility for hip fracture prediction compared to total hip aBMD and age alone (C-statistic 0.73 vs. 0.69, P = 0.009 and net reclassification improvement 0.164, P < 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Addition of TR_σ to total hip aBMD and age substantially improved prediction of 15-year hip fracture risk in this cohort of elderly women.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA); Hip fracture; Hip structure analysis; Intertrochanter; Structural geometry

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26282230     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-015-3282-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  19 in total

1.  Intertrochanteric versus femoral neck hip fractures: differential characteristics, treatment, and sequelae.

Authors:  K M Fox; J Magaziner; J R Hebel; J E Kenzora; T M Kashner
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.053

2.  Relation between age, femoral neck cortical stability, and hip fracture risk.

Authors:  Paul M Mayhew; C David Thomas; John G Clement; Nigel Loveridge; Thomas J Beck; William Bonfield; Chris J Burgoyne; Jonathan Reeve
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jul 9-15       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Intracapsular hip fracture and the region-specific loss of cortical bone: analysis by peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  N Crabtree; N Loveridge; M Parker; N Rushton; J Power; K L Bell; T J Beck; J Reeve
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Influence of the upper femur and pelvic geometry on the risk and type of hip fractures.

Authors:  J Partanen; T Jämsä; P Jalovaara
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Structural determinants of hip fracture in elderly women: re-analysis of the data from the EPIDOS study.

Authors:  P Szulc; F Duboeuf; A M Schott; P Dargent-Molina; P J Meunier; P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Predicting femoral neck strength from bone mineral data. A structural approach.

Authors:  T J Beck; C B Ruff; K E Warden; W W Scott; G U Rao
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Comparison of the effect of denosumab and alendronate on BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a randomized, blinded, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Jacques P Brown; Richard L Prince; Chad Deal; Robert R Recker; Douglas P Kiel; Luiz H de Gregorio; Peyman Hadji; Lorenz C Hofbauer; Jose M Alvaro-Gracia; Huei Wang; Matthew Austin; Rachel B Wagman; Richard Newmark; Cesar Libanati; Javier San Martin; Henry G Bone
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Effects of gender, anthropometric variables, and aging on the evolution of hip strength in men and women aged over 65.

Authors:  Stephen Kaptoge; Nichola Dalzell; Nigel Loveridge; Thomas J Beck; Kay-Tee Khaw; Jonathan Reeve
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Hip structural geometry and incidence of hip fracture in postmenopausal women: what does it add to conventional bone mineral density?

Authors:  A Z LaCroix; T J Beck; J A Cauley; C E Lewis; T Bassford; R Jackson; G Wu; Z Chen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Femoral neck BMD is a strong predictor of hip fracture susceptibility in elderly men and women because it detects cortical bone instability: the Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  Fernando Rivadeneira; M Carola Zillikens; Chris Edh De Laet; Albert Hofman; André G Uitterlinden; Thomas J Beck; Huibert Ap Pols
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  4 in total

1.  Quantitating Age-Related BMD Textural Variation from DXA Region-Free-Analysis: A Study of Hip Fracture Prediction in Three Cohorts.

Authors:  Mohsen Farzi; Jose M Pozo; Eugene McCloskey; Richard Eastell; Nicholas C Harvey; Alejandro F Frangi; Jeremy Mark Wilkinson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 6.390

2.  Osteoporosis in 10 years time: a glimpse into the future of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Giovanni Adami; Angelo Fassio; Davide Gatti; Ombretta Viapiana; Camilla Benini; Maria I Danila; Kenneth G Saag; Maurizio Rossini
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 5.346

3.  Triglyceride Glucose-Body Mass Index Is a Reliable Indicator of Bone Mineral Density and Risk of Osteoporotic Fracture in Middle-Aged and Elderly Nondiabetic Chinese Individuals.

Authors:  Zhangxin Wen; Yongfang Li; Lulu Xu; Chun Yue; Qinyi Wang; Rong Chen; Na Ding; Xiaoli Qu; Yangna Ou; Yanyi Yang; Zhifeng Sheng; Hong Liu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Effects of Hip Structure Analysis Variables on Hip Fracture: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

Authors:  Yong-Chan Ha; Jun-Il Yoo; Jeongkyun Yoo; Ki Soo Park
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.