Literature DB >> 15983728

Structural determinants of hip fracture in elderly women: re-analysis of the data from the EPIDOS study.

P Szulc1, F Duboeuf, A M Schott, P Dargent-Molina, P J Meunier, P D Delmas.   

Abstract

Hip fracture is the most disastrous osteoporotic fracture, characterized by high mortality, morbidity and institutionalization for the patient and by high economic costs for the health care system. The morphology of the upper part of the femur can influence the risk of hip fracture, e.g., a longer femoral neck is associated with a higher risk of cervical fractures, but not trochanteric ones. In this study, we evaluated the prediction of hip fracture risk by morphological parameters estimated from DXA measurements, and we compared their predictive value for cervical and trochanteric fractures in elderly women by reanalyzing previously published data (Duboeuf et al. J Bone Miner Res 1997 12 1895). This nested case-control study was performed in 232 elderly community-dwelling women from the EPIDOS cohort, including 65 women who sustained a hip fracture. After adjustment for confounding variables, women who sustained a cervical fracture had lower areal bone mineral density (aBMD), lower cortical thickness and a higher average buckling ratio (P<0.005 for all) as well as longer femoral neck (P<0.01) than controls. Women who sustained a trochanteric fracture had lower aBMD, lower cortical thickness and higher buckling ratio than controls (P<0.0001) and than women who sustained a cervical fracture (P<0.05). Their bending resistance (cross-sectional moment of inertia-CSMI, section modulus) was significantly lower in comparison with controls (P<0.05-0.001). A decrease in aBMD, cortical thickness, CSMI and section modulus as well as an increase in buckling ratio were predictive of all hip fractures (OR -1.42-2.46 per 1 SD, P<0.05-0.0001), but the ORs for all structural parameters were markedly higher for trochanteric than for cervical fractures. CSMI and section modulus were predictive of trochanteric, but not cervical fractures. However, aBMD was strongly correlated with the CSA, cortical thickness and buckling ratio (r2>0.74), which suggests that they convey the same information. CSMI and section modulus correlated with aBMD more weakly, but their OR lost statistical significance after adjustment for aBMD. In conclusion, low femoral neck aBMD, CSA and cortical thickness as well as a high buckling ratio are associated with the higher risk of hip fracture, especially trochanteric ones. These indices are highly correlated with aBMD and convey the same message. The calculated CSMI and section modulus predict trochanteric fractures, but not cervical fractures, and their statistical significance is lost after adjustment for aBMD, indicating that they reflect mainly aBMD, not mechanical properties. Thus, the independent contribution of the external diameter of the femoral neck to the risk of hip fracture cannot be reliably estimated by this technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15983728     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-1980-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  46 in total

1.  Geometry of proximal femur in the prediction of hip fracture in osteoporotic women.

Authors:  S Gnudi; C Ripamonti; G Gualtieri; N Malavolta
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Discrimination between cases of hip fracture and controls is improved by hip structural analysis compared to areal bone mineral density. An ex vivo study of the femoral neck.

Authors:  P Mayhew; S Kaptoge; N Loveridge; J Power; H P J Kroger; M Parker; J Reeve
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  Are the etiologies of cervical and trochanteric hip fractures different?

Authors:  C A Mautalen; E M Vega; T A Einhorn
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Cervical and trochanteric hip fractures: bone mass and other parameters.

Authors:  A Stewart; R W Porter; W R Primrose; L G Walker; D M Reid
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study.

Authors:  J R Center; T V Nguyen; D Schneider; P N Sambrook; J A Eisman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-03-13       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Biochemical markers of bone formation reflect endosteal bone loss in elderly men--MINOS study.

Authors:  P Szulc; P Garnero; F Marchand; F Duboeuf; P D Delmas
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Bone mineral density, hip axis length and risk of hip fracture in men: results from the Cornwall Hip Fracture Study.

Authors:  I Pande; T W O'Neill; C Pritchard; D L Scott; A D Woolf
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  A prospective study on socioeconomic aspects of fracture of the proximal femur.

Authors:  M A Schürch; R Rizzoli; B Mermillod; H Vasey; J P Michel; J P Bonjour
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Femoral neck fragility in women has its structural and biomechanical basis established by periosteal modeling during growth and endocortical remodeling during aging.

Authors:  Silvana Filardi; Roger Martin Djoumessi Zebaze; Yunbo Duan; Jan Edmonds; Thomas Beck; Ego Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Fall direction, bone mineral density, and function: risk factors for hip fracture in frail nursing home elderly.

Authors:  S L Greenspan; E R Myers; D P Kiel; R A Parker; W C Hayes; N M Resnick
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  44 in total

1.  Risedronate improves proximal femur bone density and geometry in patients with osteoporosis or osteopenia and clinical risk factors of fractures: a practice-based observational study.

Authors:  Masayuki Takakuwa; Jun Iwamoto; Masahisa Konishi; Qi Zhou; Koichi Itabashi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Smaller, weaker, and less stiff bones evolve from changes in subsistence strategy.

Authors:  N C Nowlan; K J Jepsen; E F Morgan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Age-specific reference values of hip geometric indices from a representative sample of the Japanese female population: Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Study.

Authors:  M Iki; N DongMei; J Tamaki; Y Sato; S Kagamimori; Y Kagawa; H Yoneshima
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Bone geometry and skeletal fragility.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; David Karasik
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Proximal hip geometry is linked to several chromosomal regions: genome-wide linkage results from the Framingham Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  S Demissie; J Dupuis; L A Cupples; T J Beck; D P Kiel; D Karasik
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Differences in femoral neck geometry associated with age and ethnicity.

Authors:  K M Kim; J K Brown; K J Kim; H S Choi; H N Kim; Y Rhee; S-K Lim
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Prediction of hip and other osteoporotic fractures from hip geometry in a large clinical cohort.

Authors:  W D Leslie; P S Pahlavan; J F Tsang; L M Lix
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Evaluation of a simplified hip structure analysis method for the prediction of incident hip fracture events.

Authors:  B C C Khoo; J R Lewis; K Brown; R L Prince
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  BMD T-score discriminates trochanteric fractures from unfractured controls, whereas geometry discriminates cervical fracture cases from unfractured controls of similar BMD.

Authors:  P Pulkkinen; J Partanen; P Jalovaara; T Jämsä
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Proximal femoral structure and the prediction of hip fracture in men: a large prospective study using QCT.

Authors:  Dennis M Black; Mary L Bouxsein; Lynn M Marshall; Steven R Cummings; Thomas F Lang; Jane A Cauley; Kristine E Ensrud; Carrie M Nielson; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.