Literature DB >> 2298552

Predicting femoral neck strength from bone mineral data. A structural approach.

T J Beck1, C B Ruff, K E Warden, W W Scott, G U Rao.   

Abstract

An interactive computer program was developed to derive femoral neck geometry from raw bone mineral image data for an estimate of hip strength using single plane engineering stress analysis. The program, which we call Hip Strength Analysis (HSA), was developed as an attempt to improve the predictive value of hip bone mineral data for osteoporosis fracture risk assessment. We report a series of experiments with an aluminum phantom and with cadaver femora, designed to test the accuracy of derived geometric measurements and strength estimates. Using data acquired with both Lunar DP3 (DPA) and Hologic QDR-1000 (x-ray) scanners, HSA computed femoral neck cross-sectional areas (CSA) and cross-sectional moments of inertia (CSMI) on an aluminum phantom were in excellent agreement with actual values (r greater than .99). Using Lunar DP3 data, CSA and CSMI measurements at mid-femoral necks of 22 cadaver specimens were in good general agreement with literature values. HSA computed cross-sectional properties of three of these specimens were compared with measurements derived from sequential CT cross-sectional images. Discrepancy between the two methods averaged less than 10% along the length of the femoral neck. Finally, breaking strengths of 20 of the femora were measured with a materials testing system, showing better agreement with HSA predicted strength (r = .89, percent standard of the estimate (%SEE) = 21%) than femoral neck bone mineral density (r = .79, %SEE = 28%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2298552     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199001000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  150 in total

1.  Sexual dimorphism of femoral neck cross-sectional bone geometry in athletes and non-athletes: a hip structural analysis study.

Authors:  Karen Hind; Lisa Gannon; Emma Whatley; Carlton Cooke
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Changes in proximal femur bone properties following ovariectomy and their association with resistance to fracture.

Authors:  Hélder Fonseca; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves; Mário Vaz; Maria Helena Fernandes; Rita Ferreira; Francisco Amado; Maria Paula Mota; José Alberto Duarte
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 3.  Is there a critical period for bone response to weight-bearing exercise in children and adolescents? a systematic review.

Authors:  K J MacKelvie; K M Khan; H A McKay
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 4.  Bone outcomes and technical measurement issues of bone health among children and adolescents: considerations for nutrition and physical activity intervention trials.

Authors:  Jayne A Fulkerson; John H Himes; Simone A French; Sally Jensen; Moira A Petit; Christy Stewart; Mary Story; Kristine Ensrud; Sandy Fillhouer; Kristine Jacobsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Femoral neck geometry in overweight and normal weight adolescent girls.

Authors:  Rawad El Hage; Elie Moussa; Christophe Jacob
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Bone geometry and strength adaptations to physical constraints inherent in different sports: comparison between elite female soccer players and swimmers.

Authors:  Beatrice Ferry; Martine Duclos; Lauren Burt; Perrine Therre; Franck Le Gall; Christelle Jaffré; Daniel Courteix
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Age-specific reference values of hip geometric indices from a representative sample of the Japanese female population: Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Study.

Authors:  M Iki; N DongMei; J Tamaki; Y Sato; S Kagamimori; Y Kagawa; H Yoneshima
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Hip geometry in diabetic women: implications for fracture risk.

Authors:  Rajesh Garg; Zhao Chen; Thomas Beck; Jane A Cauley; Guanglin Wu; Dorothy Nelson; Beth Lewis; Andrea LaCroix; Meryl S LeBoff
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 8.694

9.  Prediction of hip and other osteoporotic fractures from hip geometry in a large clinical cohort.

Authors:  W D Leslie; P S Pahlavan; J F Tsang; L M Lix
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Two new regions of interest to evaluate separately cortical and trabecular BMD in the proximal femur using DXA.

Authors:  Sven Prevrhal; Margarita Meta; Harry K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-11-04       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.