Literature DB >> 18767928

Comparison of the effect of denosumab and alendronate on BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a randomized, blinded, phase 3 trial.

Jacques P Brown1, Richard L Prince, Chad Deal, Robert R Recker, Douglas P Kiel, Luiz H de Gregorio, Peyman Hadji, Lorenz C Hofbauer, Jose M Alvaro-Gracia, Huei Wang, Matthew Austin, Rachel B Wagman, Richard Newmark, Cesar Libanati, Javier San Martin, Henry G Bone.   

Abstract

Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits bone resorption by neutralizing RANKL, a key mediator of osteoclast formation, function, and survival. This phase 3, multicenter, doubleblind study compared the efficacy and safety of denosumab with alendronate in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. One thousand one hundred eighty-nine postmenopausal women with a T-score <or= -2.0 at the lumbar spine or total hip were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous denosumab injections (60 mg every 6 mo [Q6M]) plus oral placebo weekly (n = 594) or oral alendronate weekly (70 mg) plus subcutaneous placebo injections Q6M (n = 595). Changes in BMD were assessed at the total hip, femoral neck, trochanter, lumbar spine, and one-third radius at 6 and 12 mo and in bone turnover markers at months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12. Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events and laboratory values. At the total hip, denosumab significantly increased BMD compared with alendronate at month 12 (3.5% versus 2.6%; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, significantly greater increases in BMD were observed with denosumab treatment at all measured skeletal sites (12-mo treatment difference: 0.6%, femoral neck; 1.0%, trochanter; 1.1%, lumbar spine; 0.6%, one-third radius; p <or= 0.0002 all sites). Denosumab treatment led to significantly greater reduction of bone turnover markers compared with alendronate therapy. Adverse events and laboratory values were similar for denosumab- and alendronate-treated subjects. Denosumab showed significantly larger gains in BMD and greater reduction in bone turnover markers compared with alendronate. The overall safety profile was similar for both treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18767928     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.0809010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  167 in total

1.  Adherence, preference, and satisfaction of postmenopausal women taking denosumab or alendronate.

Authors:  D L Kendler; M R McClung; N Freemantle; M Lillestol; A H Moffett; J Borenstein; S Satram-Hoang; Y-C Yang; P Kaur; D Macarios; S Siddhanti
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Safety and efficacy of denosumab in osteoporotic hemodialysed patients.

Authors:  Francescaromana Festuccia; Maryam Tayefeh Jafari; Alessandra Moioli; Claudia Fofi; Simona Barberi; Stefano Amendola; Salvatore Sciacchitano; Giorgio Punzo; Paolo Menè
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 3.  Emerging therapeutic opportunities for skeletal restoration.

Authors:  Masanobu Kawai; Ulrike I Mödder; Sundeep Khosla; Clifford J Rosen
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  Comparison of Denosumab and Bisphosphonates in Patients With Osteoporosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Houchen Lyu; Bakr Jundi; Chang Xu; Sara K Tedeschi; Kazuki Yoshida; Sizheng Zhao; Sagar U Nigwekar; Benjamin Z Leder; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Denosumab mid-term densitometric gain in postmenopausal osteoporosis women in clinical practice: comment on "Variability of denosumab densitometric response in postmenopausal osteoporosis".

Authors:  V Torrente-Segarra; D Roig-Vilaseca
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 6.  Denosumab: a review of its use in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Efficacy of Switching From Teriparatide to Bisphosphonate or Denosumab: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Trial.

Authors:  Rui Niimi; Toshibumi Kono; Atsushi Nishihara; Masahiro Hasegawa; Toshihiko Kono; Akihiro Sudo
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2018-06-02

Review 8.  Denosumab for joints and bones.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.592

9.  RANKL inhibition improves bone properties in a mouse model of osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Renee Bargman; Alice Huang; Adele L Boskey; Cathleen Raggio; Nancy Pleshko
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.417

10.  Evaluation of a simplified hip structure analysis method for the prediction of incident hip fracture events.

Authors:  B C C Khoo; J R Lewis; K Brown; R L Prince
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.