Literature DB >> 11499877

Influence of the upper femur and pelvic geometry on the risk and type of hip fractures.

J Partanen1, T Jämsä, P Jalovaara.   

Abstract

The geometry of the upper femur has been reported to associate with the hip fracture risk in postmenopausal women. However, these associations seem to be partly conflicting, probably because of differences in measurement setup. Here, we compared the upper femur and pelvic geometries of 70 hip fracture patients (46 cervical and 24 trochanteric fractures) and 40 age-adjusted controls based on plain anteroposterior radiographs, eliminating the possible sources of inaccuracy as far as possible by using a standardized patient position and calibrated dimension measurements by digital image analysis. The femoral neck/shaft angle (NSA) was larger in the fracture patients compared with the controls (p < 0.001). The fracture group had thinner cortices in the upper femur than the controls (p < 0.001). The femoral shaft diameter (FSD; p < 0.001), trochanter width (TW; p < 0.01), and the pelvic dimensions, that is, the smallest outer pelvic diameter (SOPD; p < 0.01) and the largest inner pelvic diameter (LIPD; p < 0.05) were smaller in the fracture group. Comparing the fracture types, we found NSA larger in the cervical hip fracture patients than in the patients with a trochanteric fracture (p < 0.01). The femoral neck/shaft cortex ratio was lower and the FSD was smaller in the cervical hip fracture group (p < 0.05). Acetabular width (AW) was greater and the SOPD was wider in the cervical fracture patients (p < 0.01). We concluded that the upper femur and pelvic dimensions as defined from calibrated and position-standardized plain radiographs are useful in the evaluation of hip fracture risk and fracture type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11499877     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.8.1540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  30 in total

1.  Combination of bone mineral density and upper femur geometry improves the prediction of hip fracture.

Authors:  Pasi Pulkkinen; Juha Partanen; Pekka Jalovaara; Timo Jämsä
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Three-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry (3D-XA): a method for reconstruction of human bones using a dual X-ray absorptiometry device.

Authors:  S Kolta; A Le Bras; D Mitton; V Bousson; J A de Guise; J Fechtenbaum; J D Laredo; C Roux; W Skalli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Differences in femoral neck geometry associated with age and ethnicity.

Authors:  K M Kim; J K Brown; K J Kim; H S Choi; H N Kim; Y Rhee; S-K Lim
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Bone density, geometry, and fracture in elderly men.

Authors:  Pawel Szulc
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Is coxa valga a predictor for the severity of knee osteoarthritis? A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ilke Coskun Benlidayi; Rengin Guzel; Sibel Basaran; Erol H Aksungur; Gulsah Seydaoglu
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Influence of physical activity and skeleton geometry on bone mass at the proximal femur in 10- to 12-year-old children--a longitudinal study.

Authors:  G Cardadeiro; F Baptista; N Rosati; V Zymbal; K F Janz; L B Sardinha
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Evaluation of a simplified hip structure analysis method for the prediction of incident hip fracture events.

Authors:  B C C Khoo; J R Lewis; K Brown; R L Prince
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  BMD T-score discriminates trochanteric fractures from unfractured controls, whereas geometry discriminates cervical fracture cases from unfractured controls of similar BMD.

Authors:  P Pulkkinen; J Partanen; P Jalovaara; T Jämsä
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Use of DXA-based structural engineering models of the proximal femur to discriminate hip fracture.

Authors:  Lang Yang; Nicola Peel; Jackie A Clowes; Eugene V McCloskey; Richard Eastell
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Experimental hip fracture load can be predicted from plain radiography by combined analysis of trabecular bone structure and bone geometry.

Authors:  P Pulkkinen; T Jämsä; E-M Lochmüller; V Kuhn; M T Nieminen; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.